João Ferreira1, Ana Mirco2. 1. Farmacêutico, Lisboa, Portugal. Electronic address: joao.ferreira.pd@gmail.com. 2. Serviços Farmacêuticos, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Novel oral anticoagulants are emerging options for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. They are increasingly used in clinical practice due to their simplicity of use and clinical benefits, but an important step is to evaluate their cost-effectiveness. The aim of the AFFORD study (A Review of Cost EFFectiveness of Novel ORal Anticoagulant Drugs) was to perform a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane and Web of Knowledge databases to identify all cost-effectiveness studies of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in AF. RESULTS: The search identified 27 studies, 18 with dabigatran, three with apixaban, two with rivaroxaban and four with at least two of these drugs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 30 405 ± 16 101 euros per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for dabigatran 110 mg, 17 566 ± 16 902 euros/QALY for dabigatran 150 mg, 8102 ± 3252 euros/QALY for age-adjusted dabigatran, 11 897 ± 3341 euros/QALY for apixaban and 17 960 ± 12 005 euros/QALY for rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: The present systematic review demonstrates that novel oral anticoagulants are cost-effective for stroke prevention in AF.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Novel oral anticoagulants are emerging options for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. They are increasingly used in clinical practice due to their simplicity of use and clinical benefits, but an important step is to evaluate their cost-effectiveness. The aim of the AFFORD study (A Review of Cost EFFectiveness of Novel ORal Anticoagulant Drugs) was to perform a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane and Web of Knowledge databases to identify all cost-effectiveness studies of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in AF. RESULTS: The search identified 27 studies, 18 with dabigatran, three with apixaban, two with rivaroxaban and four with at least two of these drugs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 30 405 ± 16 101 euros per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for dabigatran 110 mg, 17 566 ± 16 902 euros/QALY for dabigatran 150 mg, 8102 ± 3252 euros/QALY for age-adjusted dabigatran, 11 897 ± 3341 euros/QALY for apixaban and 17 960 ± 12 005 euros/QALY for rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: The present systematic review demonstrates that novel oral anticoagulants are cost-effective for stroke prevention in AF.
Authors: Kevin Bowrin; Jean-Baptiste Briere; Pierre Levy; Aurélie Millier; Jean Tardu; Mondher Toumi Journal: J Mark Access Health Policy Date: 2020-06-25
Authors: Maria Mariana Barros Melo da Silveira; Leiliandry de Araújo Melo; Filipe Maia Ferreira Gomes; Leonardo José de Cupertino Barreto da Rocha Andrade; Isabela Paulino Serur; Isabelle Cecília de Vasconcellos Piscoya; Raposo Marina Gueiros; Kleyton Palmeira do Ó; Raul Emídio de Lima; Victor Arthur Eulálio Brasileiro; Luydson Richardson Silva Vasconcelos; Dário Celestino Sobral Filho Journal: Appl Clin Genet Date: 2019-08-02
Authors: Jeffrey D Miller; Xin Ye; Gregory M Lenhart; Amanda M Farr; Oth V Tran; W Jackie Kwong; Elizabeth A Magnuson; William S Weintraub Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2016-05-20