Literature DB >> 25727586

A randomized trial of adding a plano lens to atropine for amblyopia.

David K Wallace, Elizabeth L Lazar, Michael X Repka, Jonathan M Holmes, Raymond T Kraker, Darren L Hoover, Katherine K Weise, Amy L Waters, Melissa L Rice, Robert J Peters.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some children have residual amblyopia after treatment with atropine eyedrops for amblyopia due to strabismus and/or anisometropia. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of augmenting the effect of atropine by changing the lens over the fellow eye to plano in children with residual amblyopia.
METHODS: A total of 73 children 3 to <8 years of age (mean, 5.8 years) with stable residual amblyopia (range, 20/32 to 20/160, mean 20/63(+1)) were enrolled after at least 12 weeks of atropine treatment of the fellow eye. Participants were randomly assigned to continuing weekend atropine alone or wearing a plano lens over the fellow eye (while continuing atropine). The primary outcome was assessed at 10 weeks, and participants were followed until improvement ceased.
RESULTS: At the 10-week primary outcome visit, amblyopic-eye visual acuity had improved an average of 1.1 lines with the plano lens and 0.6 lines with atropine only (difference adjusted for baseline visual acuity = + 0.5 line; 95% CI, -0.1 to +1.2). At the primary outcome or later visit when the best-measured visual acuity was observed, the mean amblyopic-eye improvement from baseline was 1.9 lines with the plano lens and 0.8 lines with atropine only.
CONCLUSIONS: When amblyopic-eye visual acuity stops improving with atropine treatment, there may be a small benefit to augmenting atropine therapy with a plano lens over the fellow eye. However, the effect was not statistically significant, and the large confidence interval raises the possibility of no benefit or a benefit larger than we observed. A larger study would be necessary to get a more precise estimate of the treatment effect.
Copyright © 2015 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25727586      PMCID: PMC4354879          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  14 in total

1.  The amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

Authors:  J M Holmes; R W Beck; M X Repka; D A Leske; R T Kraker; R C Blair; P S Moke; E E Birch; R A Saunders; R W Hertle; G E Quinn; K A Simons; J M Miller
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09

2.  Age-specific prevalence and causes of bilateral and unilateral visual impairment in older Australians: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  J J Wang; S Foran; P Mitchell
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Combined optical and atropine penalization for the treatment of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Stephen B Kaye; Sean I Chen; Gary Price; Lesley C Kaye; Carmel Noonan; Ajay Tripathi; Pammal Ashwin; Nolan Cota; David Clark; Jeremy Butcher
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Full-time atropine, intermittent atropine, and optical penalization and binocular outcome in treatment of strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  K Simons; L Stein; E C Sener; S Vitale; D L Guyton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  The course of moderate amblyopia treated with atropine in children: experience of the amblyopia treatment study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Penalization in the treatment of amblyopia.

Authors:  G K von Noorden; J B Milam
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  The efficacy of optical and pharmacological penalization.

Authors:  M X Repka; J M Ray
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Preschool vision screening: rationale, methodology and outcome.

Authors:  K Simons
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  A randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at age 10 years.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; Raymond T Kraker; Roy W Beck; Jonathan M Holmes; Susan A Cotter; Eileen E Birch; William F Astle; Danielle L Chandler; Joost Felius; Robert W Arnold; D Robbins Tien; Stephen R Glaser
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08

10.  Pharmacological plus optical penalization treatment for amblyopia: results of a randomized trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The treatment of amblyopia: current practice and emerging trends.

Authors:  Eleni Papageorgiou; Ioannis Asproudis; Gail Maconachie; Evangelia E Tsironi; Irene Gottlob
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia.

Authors:  Tianjing Li; Riaz Qureshi; Kate Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-28

3.  The Amblyopia Treatment Studies: Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Angela M Chen; Susan A Cotter
Journal:  Adv Ophthalmol Optom       Date:  2016-08

4.  Efficacy of interventions for amblyopia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yonghong Li; Huan Sun; Xiaojuan Zhu; Yana Su; Tianqi Yu; Xinyu Wu; Xiaoqin Zhou; Li Jing
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  New advances in amblyopia therapy II: refractive therapies.

Authors:  Courtney L Kraus; Susan M Culican
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  Development of a core outcome set for amblyopia, strabismus and ocular motility disorders: a review to identify outcome measures.

Authors:  Samia Al Jabri; Jamie Kirkham; Fiona J Rowe
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 7.  Simplified updates on the pathophysiology and recent developments in the treatment of amblyopia: A review.

Authors:  Santhan K S Gopal; Jai Kelkar; Aditya Kelkar; Abhishek Pandit
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 8.  Management of amblyopia in pediatric patients: Current insights.

Authors:  Sagnik Sen; Pallavi Singh; Rohit Saxena
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.775

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.