Literature DB >> 25727558

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on locoregional surgical treatment of breast cancer.

Eleftherios P Mamounas1.   

Abstract

Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy (NC) has become the standard of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer and is being increasingly used in those with large operable disease. Its main clinical advantages from a surgical therapy standpoint include the potential for conversion of patients requiring mastectomy to breast-conservation candidates, the potential for improving the cosmetic outcome following lumpectomy by decreasing the size of the primary breast tumor even if the patient is a lumpectomy candidate at presentation, and the potential for converting patients who present with positive axillary nodes and who would initially require axillary lymph node dissection to candidates for sentinel lymph node biopsy alone. Important steps are required from the time of diagnosis until the time of surgical resection to ensure successful locoregional therapy outcomes in patients treated with NC. They include accurate assessment of the location and extent of the primary breast tumor and determination of axillary nodal status before and after NC. This information is critical for successful execution of the surgical plan and to optimize the use of adjuvant radiotherapy following NC. In the future, development of more active neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and novel molecular and imaging techniques will undoubtedly lead to further individualization of breast cancer surgical management following NC, including the possibility of avoiding surgical resection in cases with a high likelihood of achieving a pathological complete response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25727558     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4406-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

1.  Systematic analysis of parameters predicting pathological axillary status (ypN0 vs. ypN+) in patients with breast cancer converting from cN+ to ycN0 through primary systemic therapy (PST).

Authors:  C Liedtke; Hans-Christian Kolberg; L Kerschke; D Görlich; I Bauerfeind; T Fehm; B Fleige; G Helms; A Lebeau; A Stäbler; S Schmatloch; M Hausschild; L Schwentner; Gunter von Minckwitz; S Loibl; M Untch; T Kühn
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 2.  Sentinel lymph nodes for breast carcinoma: an update on current practice.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Dose variability in different lymph node levels during locoregional breast cancer irradiation: the impact of deep-inspiration breath hold.

Authors:  Montserrat Pazos; Alba Fiorentino; Aurélie Gaasch; Stephan Schönecker; Daniel Reitz; Christian Heinz; Maximilian Niyazi; Marciana-Nona Duma; Filippo Alongi; Claus Belka; Stefanie Corradini
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  Management of the Positive Axilla in 2017.

Authors:  Tolga Ozmen; Alicia Huff Vinyard; Eli Avisar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-05-03

5.  What is known about melatonin, chemotherapy and altered gene expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlos Martínez-Campa; Javier Menéndez-Menéndez; Carolina Alonso-González; Alicia González; Virginia Álvarez-García; Samuel Cos
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Predicting initial margin status in breast cancer patients during breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Zihao Pan; Liling Zhu; Qian Li; Jianguo Lai; Jingwen Peng; Fengxi Su; Shunrong Li; Kai Chen
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The role of IRAK1 in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Muwen Yang; Xingsong Qin; Guangyuan Qin; Xinyu Zheng
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Rising Bilateral Mastectomy Rates Among Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Recipients in California From 1998 to 2012.

Authors:  Irene L Wapnir; Allison W Kurian; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Christina A Clarke; Scarlett L Gomez
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 13.787

9.  Prognostic value of HMGB1 in early breast cancer patients under neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ruth Exner; Monika Sachet; Tobias Arnold; Mercedes Zinn-Zinnenburg; Anna Michlmayr; Peter Dubsky; Rupert Bartsch; Guenther Steger; Michael Gnant; Michael Bergmann; Thomas Bachleitner-Hofmann; Rudolf Oehler
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  A machine learning model that classifies breast cancer pathologic complete response on MRI post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Sutton; Natsuko Onishi; Duc A Fehr; Brittany Z Dashevsky; Meredith Sadinski; Katja Pinker; Danny F Martinez; Edi Brogi; Lior Braunstein; Pedram Razavi; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Virgilio Sacchini; Joseph O Deasy; Elizabeth A Morris; Harini Veeraraghavan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.