Niraj Mistry1, Arun Keepanasseril2, Nancy L Wilczynski3, Robby Nieuwlaat4, Manthan Ravall3, R Brian Haynes2. 1. Pediatric Outcomes Research Team (PORT), Division of Paediatric Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Department of Pediatrics, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada niraj.mistry@mail.utoronto.ca. 2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton Canada Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. 3. Health Information Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. 4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite effective therapies for many conditions, patients find it difficult to adhere to prescribed treatments. Technology-mediated interventions (TMIs) are increasingly being used with the hope of improving adherence. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of TMI, intended to enhance patient adherence to prescribed medications, on both medication adherence and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A secondary in-depth analysis was conducted of the subset of studies that utilized technology in at least one component of the intervention from an updated Cochrane review on all interventions for enhancing medication adherence. We included studies that clearly described an information and communication technology or medical device as the sole or major component of the adherence intervention. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies were eligible for in-depth review. Only seven had a low risk of bias for study design features, primary adherence, and clinical outcomes. Eighteen studies used a TMI for education and/or counseling, 11 studies used a TMI for self-monitoring and/or feedback, and nine studies used electronic reminders. Studies used a variety of TMIs, with telephone the most common technology in use. Studies targeted a wide distribution of diseases and used a variety of adherence and clinical outcome measures. A minority targeted children and adolescents. Fourteen studies reported significant effects in both adherence and clinical outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides evidence for the inconsistent effectiveness of TMI for medication adherence and clinical outcomes. These results must be interpreted with caution due to a lack of high-quality studies.
BACKGROUND: Despite effective therapies for many conditions, patients find it difficult to adhere to prescribed treatments. Technology-mediated interventions (TMIs) are increasingly being used with the hope of improving adherence. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of TMI, intended to enhance patient adherence to prescribed medications, on both medication adherence and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A secondary in-depth analysis was conducted of the subset of studies that utilized technology in at least one component of the intervention from an updated Cochrane review on all interventions for enhancing medication adherence. We included studies that clearly described an information and communication technology or medical device as the sole or major component of the adherence intervention. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies were eligible for in-depth review. Only seven had a low risk of bias for study design features, primary adherence, and clinical outcomes. Eighteen studies used a TMI for education and/or counseling, 11 studies used a TMI for self-monitoring and/or feedback, and nine studies used electronic reminders. Studies used a variety of TMIs, with telephone the most common technology in use. Studies targeted a wide distribution of diseases and used a variety of adherence and clinical outcome measures. A minority targeted children and adolescents. Fourteen studies reported significant effects in both adherence and clinical outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides evidence for the inconsistent effectiveness of TMI for medication adherence and clinical outcomes. These results must be interpreted with caution due to a lack of high-quality studies.
Authors: David J Meyers; Megan B Cole; Momotazur Rahman; Yoojin Lee; William Rogers; Roee Gutman; Ira B Wilson Journal: AIDS Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: David J Meyers; Megan B Cole; Momotazur Rahman; Yoojin Lee; William Rogers; Roee Gutman; Ira B Wilson Journal: AIDS Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Cecilia N Hollenhorst; Vanessa Elliott; Michele Heisler; Kevin Schneider; Ken Resnicow; Paula Anne Newman-Casey Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Date: 2020-05-07
Authors: Laura J Anderson; Teryl K Nuckols; Courtney Coles; Michael M Le; Jeff L Schnipper; Rita Shane; Cynthia Jackevicius; Joshua Lee; Joshua M Pevnick Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Bettina Habib; David Buckeridge; Melissa Bustillo; Santiago Nicolas Marquez; Manish Thakur; Thai Tran; Daniala L Weir; Robyn Tamblyn Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2021-07-31