Literature DB >> 25726436

Development of a teicoplanin loading regimen that rapidly achieves target serum concentrations in critically ill patients with severe infections.

Atsuo Nakamura1, Osamu Takasu2, Yoshiro Sakai3, Teruo Sakamoto2, Norio Yamashita2, Shinjiro Mori2, Toshio Morita2, Masakazu Nabeta2, Nobuhisa Hirayu2, Naomasa Yoshiyama2, Mariko Moroki2, Keita Tashiro2, Mikinori Kannae2.   

Abstract

We performed high-dose loading (12 mg/kg every 12 h for 48 h; 4 doses total) of teicoplanin (TEIC) in patients with severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, with the goal of achieving target serum concentration (TEICc) ≥ 15 mg/l within 48 h of starting administration. The safety and effectiveness of the fixed, early-stage administration method were evaluated across a range of kidney dysfunction severity levels. TEIC high-dose loading was administered to 106 patients with MRSA infection from February 2010 to February 2013. After high-dose loading, maintenance doses based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of TEICc were administered via 30-min intravenous drips, every 24 h. Subjects were divided into 4 groups based on kidney function and renal replacement therapy (RRT) status for safety and effectiveness evaluation: group 1 (G1) did not undergo RRT and exhibited creatinine clearance (Ccr; ml/min/m(2)) >50, group 2 (G2) exhibited Ccr ≤ 50, group 3 (G3) underwent continuous RRT (CRRT), and group 4 (G4) underwent intermittent RRT (IRRT). TEICc was measured after 24, 48, 72, and 144 h, immediately before TEIC administration. Target TEICc was reached in all groups, and bacteriological effectiveness and utility were high in G1, G2, and G3. The maximum TEICc (≥ 28.0 mg/l) and serum albumin (≤ 1.84 g/dl) were associated with organ toxicity. Fixed high-dose loading of TEIC achieved the target therapeutic range (≥ 15 mg/l) within 48 h of the start of administration regardless of kidney dysfunction, and exhibited sufficient utility.
Copyright © 2015 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-dose loading; Hypoalbuminemia; MRSA; Teicoplanin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25726436     DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.211


  9 in total

1.  Change of teicoplanin loading dose requirement for incremental increases of systemic inflammatory response syndrome score in the setting of sepsis.

Authors:  Takafumi Nakano; Yoshihiko Nakamura; Tohru Takata; Keiichi Irie; Kazunori Sano; Osamu Imakyure; Kenichi Mishima; Koujiro Futagami
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-04-28

2.  Enhanced loading regimen of teicoplanin is necessary to achieve therapeutic pharmacokinetics levels for the improvement of clinical outcomes in patients with renal dysfunction.

Authors:  T Ueda; Y Takesue; K Nakajima; K Ichiki; A Doita; Y Wada; T Tsuchida; Y Takahashi; M Ishihara; H Ikeuchi; M Uchino; T Kimura
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Are Antibiotics Appropriately Dosed in Critically Ill Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance? A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Sistanizad; Rezvan Hassanpour; Elham Pourheidar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.149

4.  Evaluating the optimal dose of teicoplanin with therapeutic drug monitoring: not too high for adverse event, not too low for treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Si-Ho Kim; Cheol-In Kang; Kyungmin Huh; Sun Young Cho; Doo Ryeon Chung; Soo-Youn Lee; Yae-Jean Kim; Kyong Ran Peck
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin: a consensus review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Authors:  Yuki Hanai; Yoshiko Takahashi; Takashi Niwa; Toshihiko Mayumi; Yukihiro Hamada; Toshimi Kimura; Kazuaki Matsumoto; Satoshi Fujii; Yoshio Takesue
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosage Optimization of Teicoplanin in Children With Different Renal Functions.

Authors:  Liuliu Gao; Hua Xu; Qi Ye; Sichan Li; Jun Wang; Yan Mei; Changhe Niu; Ting Kang; Chen Chen; Yang Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Construction and Interpretation of Prediction Model of Teicoplanin Trough Concentration via Machine Learning.

Authors:  Pan Ma; Ruixiang Liu; Wenrui Gu; Qing Dai; Yu Gan; Jing Cen; Shenglan Shang; Fang Liu; Yongchuan Chen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-08

8.  Dose Optimization of Teicoplanin for Critically Ill Patients With Renal Dysfunction and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Experience From a Prospective Interventional Study.

Authors:  Lu Shi; Zhiwei Zhuang; Lufen Duan; Chenqi Zhu; Hongzhi Xue; Xiao Wang; Xiaowen Xu; Yunlong Yuan; Ling Shi; Jiahui Li; Jiantong Sun; Xin Liu; Qin Zhou; Jian Lu; Lian Tang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Retrospective analysis of relationships among the dose regimen, trough concentration, efficacy, and safety of teicoplanin in Chinese patients with moderate-severe Gram-positive infections.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhou; Long Cheng; Yanqiu Gao; Wei Cao; Jia Liu; Hongya Guan; Hua Zhang; Yun Shi; Wenying Lv
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.