| Literature DB >> 25726039 |
A Alanio1, D Garcia-Hermoso2, S Mercier-Delarue3, F Lanternier4, M Gits-Muselli5, J Menotti6, B Denis7, A Bergeron8, M Legrand9, O Lortholary10, S Bretagne11.
Abstract
Molecular methods are crucial for mucormycosis diagnosis because cultures are frequently negative, even if microscopy suggests the presence of hyphae in tissues. We assessed PCR/electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) for Mucorales identification in 19 unfixed tissue samples from 13 patients with proven or probable mucormycosis and compared the results with culture, quantitative real-time PCR, 16S-23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer region (ITS PCR) and 18S PCR sequencing. Concordance with culture identification to both genus and species levels was higher for PCR/ESI-MS than for the other techniques. Thus, PCR/ESI-MS is suitable for Mucorales identification, within 6 hours, for tissue samples for which microscopy results suggest the presence of hyphae.Entities:
Keywords: Culture; Mucorales identification; PCR; electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry; mucormycosis; species level
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25726039 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.01.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect ISSN: 1198-743X Impact factor: 8.067