Literature DB >> 25725793

Dynamic enhancement pattern of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the correlation with cirrhosis and tumor size.

Qing Lu1, Li-Yun Xue, Wen-Ping Wang, Bei-Jian Huang, Cui-Xian Li.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the dynamic enhancement pattern of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) of varying sizes and hepatic backgrounds.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CEUS was performed in 98 pathologically confirmed ICCs (n = 39 < 30 mm, n = 59 > 30 mm; n = 45 with cirrhosis and n = 53 with normal liver). The dynamic enhancement pattern of CEUS was retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: In the arterial phase, heterogeneous hyper-enhancement was more frequent in ICCs with cirrhosis (21/45, 46.7% vs. 11/53, 20.8% in ICCs with normal liver, p = 0.009), while peripheral hyper-enhancement and hypo-enhancement were more common in ICCs with normal liver (14/53, 26.4%; 11/53, 20.8% vs. 2/45, 4.4%; 2/45, 4.4% in ICCs with cirrhosis, p = 0.005 and 0.033, respectively). There were no significant differences between portal and delayed phases. In ICCs < 30 mm, homogeneous hyper-enhancement was more frequently identified (27/39, 69.2% vs. 10/59, 16.9% in ICCs > 30 mm, p < 0.001), whereas in ICCs > 30 mm, heterogeneous, and peripheral hyper-enhancement were more commonly observed (26/59, 44.1% vs. 6/39, 15.4% in ICCs < 30 mm, p = 0.004, and 14/59, 23.7% vs. 2/39, 5.1% in ICCs < 30 mm, p = 0.023, respectively). The washout pattern in portal and delayed phases were not significantly different in ICCs with different sizes. 60.7% (17/28) ICCs < 30 mm and 85.2% (23/27) ICCs > 30 mm with cirrhosis, together with 66.7% (14/21) ICCs < 30 mm with normal liver displayed intense contrast agent uptake (homogeneous or heterogeneous hyper-enhancement) in arterial phase followed by washout in portal and delayed phase, which was much higher than that in ICCs > 30 mm with normal liver (34.4%, 11/32, p < 0.001, <0.001 and =0.027, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The CEUS dynamic enhancement pattern of ICC varies with size and hepatic background. The enhancement pattern is indistinguishable from hepatocellular carcinoma on CEUS in most ICCs with cirrhosis and in most ICCs < 30 mm with normal liver.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25725793     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0379-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  8 in total

1.  Distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with and without risks: the evaluation of the LR-M criteria of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system version 2017.

Authors:  Fei Li; Qing Li; Yubo Liu; Jing Han; Wei Zheng; Yini Huang; Xueyi Zheng; Longhui Cao; Jian-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Advances of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography with SonoVue®.

Authors:  Veronica Salvatore; Alice Gianstefani; Giulia Negrini; Giulia Allegretti; Marzia Galassi; Fabio Piscaglia
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 11.740

3.  Differentiation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: A predictive model using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Li-Da Chen; Si-Min Ruan; Jin-Yu Liang; Zheng Yang; Shun-Li Shen; Yang Huang; Wei Li; Zhu Wang; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-De Lu; Ming Kuang; Wei Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS version 2018 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from other hepatic malignancies in patients with hepatitis B virus infection.

Authors:  Shuo Shao; Yingying Liang; Sichi Kuang; Jingbiao Chen; Qungang Shan; Hao Yang; Yao Zhang; Bin Wang; Kathryn J Fowler; Jin Wang; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.363

5.  Diagnosis of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Malignancies in Patients With Risks for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CEUS LI-RADS Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS.

Authors:  Yi-Xin Hu; Jing-Xian Shen; Jing Han; Si-Yue Mao; Ru-Shuang Mao; Qing Li; Fei Li; Zhi-Xing Guo; Jian-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Elaboration on Korean Liver Cancer Study Group-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines Compared with Other Guidelines and Remaining Issues.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Joong-Won Park; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Impact of tumor size and cirrhotic background for differentiating HCC and ICC with CEUS: does it matter for patients undergoing hepatectomy?

Authors:  Chen Jin; Xiao-Yun Zhang; Jia-Wu Li; Chuan Li; Wei Peng; Tian-Fu Wen; Yan Luo; Qiang Lu; Xiao-Fei Zhong; Jing-Yi Zhang; Lv-Nan Yan; Jia-Yin Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-27

8.  A nomogram incorporating six easily obtained parameters to discriminate intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Mengmeng Wang; Yuzhen Gao; Huijuan Feng; Elisa Warner; Mingrui An; Jian'an Jia; Shipeng Chen; Meng Fang; Jun Ji; Xing Gu; Chunfang Gao
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.