Literature DB >> 25725329

A European survey on current practices in epilepsy monitoring units and implications for patients' safety.

Guido Rubboli1, Sandor Beniczky2, Steven Claus3, Maria Paola Canevini4, Philippe Kahane5, Hermann Stefan6, Walter van Emde Boas7, Demetrios Velis8, Elise Reus9, Antonio Gil-Nagel10, Bernhard J Steinhoff11, Eugen Trinka12, Philippe Ryvlin13.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to survey current practices in European epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) with emphasis on safety issues.
METHODS: A 37-item questionnaire investigating characteristics and organization of EMUs, including measures for prevention and management of seizure-related serious adverse events (SAEs), was distributed to all identified European EMUs plus one located in Israel (N=150).
RESULTS: Forty-eight (32%) EMUs, located in 18 countries, completed the questionnaire. Epilepsy monitoring unit beds are 1-2 in 43%, 3-4 in 34%, and 5-6 in 19% of EMUs; staff physicians are 1-2 in 32%, 3-4 in 34%, and 5-6 in 19% of EMUs. Personnel operating in EMUs include epileptologists (in 69% of EMUs), clinical neurophysiologists trained in epilepsy (in 46% of EMUs), child neurologists (in 35% of EMUs), neurology and clinical neurophysiology residents (in 46% and in 8% of EMUs, respectively), and neurologists not trained in epilepsy (in 27% of EMUs). In 20% of EMUs, patients' observation is only intermittent or during the daytime and primarily carried out by neurophysiology technicians and/or nurses (in 71% of EMUs) or by patients' relatives (in 40% of EMUs). Automatic detection systems for seizures are used in 15%, for body movements in 8%, for oxygen desaturation in 33%, and for ECG abnormalities in 17% of EMUs. Protocols for management of acute seizures are lacking in 27%, of status epilepticus in 21%, and of postictal psychoses in 87% of EMUs. Injury prevention consists of bed protections in 96% of EMUs, whereas antisuffocation pillows are employed in 21%, and environmental protections in monitoring rooms and in bathrooms are implemented in 38% and in 25% of EMUs, respectively. The most common SAEs were status epilepticus reported by 79%, injuries by 73%, and postictal psychoses by 67% of EMUs.
CONCLUSIONS: All EMUs have faced different types of SAEs. Wide variation in practice patterns and lack of protocols and of precautions to ensure patients' safety might promote the occurrence and severity of SAEs. Our findings highlight the need for standardized and shared protocols for an effective and safe management of patients in EMUs.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Cardiac monitoring; Complications; Epilepsy monitoring unit; Long-term monitoring; Safety; Seizure detection; Video-EEG

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25725329     DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Behav        ISSN: 1525-5050            Impact factor:   2.937


  4 in total

1.  Machine Learning Characterization of Ictal and Interictal States in EEG Aimed at Automated Seizure Detection.

Authors:  Gaetano Zazzaro; Luigi Pavone
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  A Standardized Protocol to Improve Acute Seizure Management in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Sara Pavitt; Alison Carley; Brenda Porter; Juliet K Knowles
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-08

3.  Personalized safety measures reduce the adverse event rate of long-term video EEG.

Authors:  Judith Dobesberger; Julia Höfler; Markus Leitinger; Giorgi Kuchukhidze; Georg Zimmermann; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Iris Unterberger; Gerald Walser; Gudrun Kalss; Alexandra Rohracher; Caroline Neuray; Teia Kobulashvili; Yvonne Höller; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2017-09-18

Review 4.  Automatic Computer-Based Detection of Epileptic Seizures.

Authors:  Christoph Baumgartner; Johannes P Koren; Michaela Rothmayer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.