Literature DB >> 25725198

A critical review of protocols for moss biomonitoring of atmospheric deposition: sampling and sample preparation.

J A Fernández1, M T Boquete2, A Carballeira2, J R Aboal2.   

Abstract

Currently, the most important guideline for the application of the moss technique to monitor the atmospheric deposition of heavy metals is the "Heavy metals, nitrogen and POPs in European mosses: 2015 survey" published by the UNECE ICP Vegetation. Two main problems have been identified with this guideline: i) some of the recommendations regarding the methodological aspects involved in the application of the moss technique are not based on scientific criteria; and, ii) some recommendations in the manual are very vague and some aspects are even left out (e.g., elevation, distance to the coast). As a result there exists a high variability in the application of the protocol and many scientists adapt it to the specific conditions in the studied areas without evaluating how changes affect the results obtained. Therefore, in this article a total of 369 studies were reviewed including both methodological and application studies of the passive biomonitoring of the atmospheric deposition of heavy metals with terrestrial mosses. The results of this review have shown on the one hand, that none of the articles completely accomplished the ICP-Vegetation protocol suggestions, either because the information regarding some aspects was lacking or simply because the authors did not follow the manual suggestions. On the other hand, it was found that the results of methodological studies sometimes contradicted the ICP Vegetation manual recommendations. Thus, a new protocol in which each suggestion has been carefully and rigorously contrasted with the available literature has been proposed in this paper. In addition, practical and economic issues have also been considered and much more concise suggestions have been proposed which would facilitate its fulfilment in a more objective way.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Methodology harmonization; Passive biomonitoring; Terrestrial mosses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25725198     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

Review 1.  The use of vegetation, bees, and snails as important tools for the biomonitoring of atmospheric pollution-a review.

Authors:  Josephine Al-Alam; Asma Chbani; Ziad Faljoun; Maurice Millet
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Multivariate extraction of dominant geochemical markers for deposition of 69 elements in the Bregalnica River basin, Republic of Macedonia (moss biomonitoring).

Authors:  Biljana Balabanova; Trajče Stafilov; Robert Šajn; Claudiu Tănăselia
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The effects of experimentally supplied lead nitrate on three common Mediterranean moss species.

Authors:  Jennifer Cogolludo; Belén Estébanez; Nagore G Medina
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Resuspension of settled atmospheric particulate matter on plant leaves determined by wind and leaf surface characteristics.

Authors:  Guiling Zheng; Peng Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Effects of tobacco smoke on indoor air quality: the use of mosses in biomonitoring.

Authors:  Paweł Świsłowski; Bogusław Śmiechowicz; Małgorzata Rajfur
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2022-02-28

6.  The bryophyte community as bioindicator of heavy metals in a waterfall outflow.

Authors:  Narin Printarakul; Weeradej Meeinkuirt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Metals in Pleurozium schreberi and Polytrichum commune from areas with various levels of pollution.

Authors:  Krzysztof Zawadzki; Aleksandra Samecka-Cymerman; Krzysztof Kolon; Bronisław Wojtuń; Lucyna Mróz; Alexander J Kempers
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Estimation of plant sampling uncertainty: an example based on chemical analysis of moss samples.

Authors:  Sabina Dołęgowska
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  (Persistent) Organic pollutants in Germany: results from a pilot study within the 2015 moss survey.

Authors:  Annekatrin Dreyer; Stefan Nickel; Winfried Schröder
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.893

10.  The influence of preparation methodology on the concentrations of heavy metals in Pleurozium schreberi moss samples prior to use in active biomonitoring studies.

Authors:  Paweł Świsłowski; Grzegorz Kosior; Małgorzata Rajfur
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 4.223

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.