Literature DB >> 25724706

Gender Differences in Fecal Immunochemical Test Performance for Early Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia.

Atija Kapidzic1, Miriam P van der Meulen2, Lieke Hol3, Aafke H C van Roon3, Caspar W N Looman2, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar2, Marjolein van Ballegooijen2, Anneke J van Vuuren3, Jacqueline C I Y Reijerink4, Monique E van Leerdam3, Ernst J Kuipers3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are used widely in colorectal cancer screening. Programs use the same fecal hemoglobin threshold for colonoscopy referral for men and women, but it is unclear whether FIT performs equally in both sexes. We therefore assessed FIT performance in men and women.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed, in which a total of 10,008 average-risk subjects (age, 50-74 y) were invited for first-round screening and 8316 average-risk subjects (age, 51-74 y) were invited for second-round screening with a single FIT. Subjects with a hemoglobin (Hb) level of 10 μg hemoglobin (Hb)/g (or ≥50 ng/mL) feces or higher were referred for colonoscopy. The test characteristics were assessed by sex for a range of FIT cut-off values.
RESULTS: In total, 59.8% of men and 64.6% of women participated in the first round (P < .001). At a cut-off level of 10 μg Hb/g feces, the positivity rate was significantly higher among men (10.7%) compared with women (6.3%; P < .001) in the first round. The detection rate of advanced neoplasia was 4.4% for men and 2.2% for women (P < .001) in the first round. The positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia in the first round was 42% for men and 37% for women (P = .265). A significantly higher false-positive rate in men (6.3%) than in women (4.1%; P < .001) was found. Similar differences in these test characteristics were seen in the second round.
CONCLUSIONS: At a cut-off level of 10 μg Hb/g feces the FIT positivity rate was higher in men, reflected by both a higher detection rate and a higher false-positive rate. The use of the same cut-off value in men and women in FIT screening is recommended based on equal test performance in terms of positive predictive value.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal Cancer Screening; Fecal Occult Blood Test; Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25724706     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  10 in total

1.  Fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: The gender dilemma.

Authors:  Esmée J Grobbee; Els Wieten; Bettina E Hansen; Esther M Stoop; Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Patrick M Bossuyt; Evelien Dekker; Ernst J Kuipers; Manon Cw Spaander
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Participant-Related Risk Factors for False-Positive and False-Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Clasine M de Klerk; Lisanne M Vendrig; Patrick M Bossuyt; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Yield of Colonoscopy After a Positive Result From a Fecal Immunochemical Test OC-Light.

Authors:  Muhammad Alsayid; Maneesh H Singh; Rachel Issaka; Victoria Laleau; Lukejohn Day; Jeffrey Lee; James Allison; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Microbiota-based model improves the sensitivity of fecal immunochemical test for detecting colonic lesions.

Authors:  Nielson T Baxter; Mack T Ruffin; Mary A M Rogers; Patrick D Schloss
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 11.117

5.  Correlating Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Results with Neoplastic Findings on Colonoscopy in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Neal Shahidi; Laura Gentile; Lovedeep Gondara; Jeremy Hamm; Colleen E McGahan; Robert Enns; Jennifer Telford
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-12-26

6.  Impact of Fecal Hb Levels on Advanced Neoplasia Detection and the Diagnostic Miss Rate For Colorectal Cancer Screening in High-Risk vs. Average-Risk Subjects: a Multi-Center Study.

Authors:  Satimai Aniwan; Thawee Ratanachu-Ek; Supot Pongprasobchai; Julajak Limsrivilai; Ong-Ard Praisontarangkul; Pises Pisespongsa; Pisaln Mairiang; Apichat Sangchan; Jaksin Sottisuporn; Naruemon Wisedopas; Pinit Kullavanijaya; Rungsun Rerknimitr
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  Variation of diagnostic performance of fecal immunochemical testing for hemoglobin by sex and age: results from a large screening cohort.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Jing Qian; Simone Werner
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  Advances in Fecal Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Eline H Schreuders; Esmée J Grobbee; Manon C W Spaander; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03

9.  Population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes using a faecal immunochemical test: should faecal haemoglobin cut-offs differ by age and sex?

Authors:  Eunate Arana-Arri; Isabel Idigoras; Begoña Uranga; Raquel Pérez; Ana Irurzun; Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea; Callum G Fraser; Isabel Portillo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Should colorectal cancer screening start at different ages for men and women? Cost-effectiveness analysis for a resource-constrained service.

Authors:  Chloe Thomas; Olena Mandrik; Sophie Whyte; Catherine L Saunders; Simon J Griffin; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-02-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.