Literature DB >> 25724401

Neonatal outcome of very preterm twins: policy of planned vaginal or cesarean delivery.

Loïc Sentilhes1, Anne Oppenheimer2, Anne-Charlotte Bouhours3, Estelle Normand2, Bassam Haddad4, Philippe Descamps3, Loïc Marpeau5, François Goffinet6, Gilles Kayem2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare neonatal mortality and morbidity in very preterm twins with the first twin in cephalic presentation in hospitals with a policy of planned vaginal delivery (PVD) and those with a policy of planned cesarean delivery (PCD). STUDY
DESIGN: Women with preterm cephalic first twins delivered after preterm labor and/or premature preterm rupture of membranes from 26(0/7) to 31(6/7) weeks of gestation were identified from the databases of 6 perinatal centers and classified as PVD or PCD according to the center's management policy from 1999 to 2010. Severe neonatal morbidity was defined as any of the following: intraventricular hemorrhage grades 3-4, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and hospital death. The independent effect of the planned mode of delivery, defined by the center's management policy, was tested and quantified with a 2-level multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: The PVD group included 248 women, and the PCD group 63. Maternal characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups. The rate of vaginal delivery was 85.9% (213 of 248) vs 20.6% (13 of 63) (P < .001), and the rate of cesarean delivery for the second twin was 1.6% (4 of 248) vs 4.8% (3 of 63) (P = .13) for PVD and PCD. PVD had no independent effect on either newborn hospital mortality or severe neonatal composite morbidity.
CONCLUSION: A policy of planned vaginal delivery of very preterm twins with the first twin in cephalic presentation does not increase either severe neonatal morbidity or mortality.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; neonatal death; neonatal morbidity; preterm birth; twins

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25724401     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Preterm birth in twin pregnancies: Clinical outcomes and predictive parameters.

Authors:  Zehra Nihal Dolgun; Cihan Inan; Ahmet Salih Altintas; Sabri Berkem Okten; Niyazi Cenk Sayin
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 2.  What is the safest mode of delivery for extremely preterm cephalic/non-cephalic twin pairs? A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Catherine Dagenais; Anne-Mary Lewis-Mikhael; Marinela Grabovac; Amit Mukerji; Sarah D McDonald
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Favipiravir exposure and pregnancy outcome of COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Zeynep Tırmıkçıoğlu
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Fetal Outcomes in Preterm Cesarean Sections.

Authors:  Sundus Rahman; Mohib Ullah; Asma Ali; Nighat Afridi; Humaira Bashir; Zahra Amjad; Aliya Jafri; Areeba Jawaid
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-02

5.  In which groups of pregnant women can the caesarean delivery rate likely be reduced safely in the USA? A multicentre cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jin-Wen Zhang; Ware Branch; Matthew Hoffman; Ank De Jonge; Sheng-Hui Li; James Troendle; Jun Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.