Literature DB >> 25724398

Prognostic factors, morbidity and mortality in pancreatic trauma: a critical appraisal of 432 consecutive patients treated at a Level 1 Trauma Centre.

J E J Krige1, U K Kotze2, M Setshedi3, A J Nicol4, P H Navsaria4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This large retrospective observational cohort study evaluated prognostic factors, 30-day morbidity and mortality and complications related to the pancreas in patients who had sustained pancreatic injuries.
METHODS: The records of 432 consecutive patients treated for pancreatic injuries at an urban Level 1 Trauma Centre in Cape Town between January 1982 and December 2012 were reviewed. Primary endpoints were postoperative morbidity and death. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess significant predictors of morbidity and mortality.
RESULTS: Overall mortality in 432 patients [394 men, median age 26, median RTS 7.8] was 15.7% and morbidity 66%. Bivariate logistic regression analysis showed that nine factors, age, RTS, presence of shock, need for a transfusion, volume of blood transfused, damage control surgery, AAST grade of pancreatic injury, an associated vascular injury and a repeat laparotomy were significant predictors of morbidity. In the final multivariate logistic regression analysis model however only two variables, AAST grade of pancreatic injury and a repeat laparotomy were significant predictors of morbidity. When factors associated with mortality were considered, logistic regression analysis found that 11 variables, age, RTS, the presence of shock, patients who required a major blood transfusion, the median number of units transfused, the need for a damage control laparotomy, AAST grade 3, 4, 5 pancreatic injuries, associated vascular injuries, the number of associated injuries, postoperative complications and days in ICU were significant. However in the final stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis model only five variables, age, shock, median number of units transfused and the presence of associated complications were significant factors associated with mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity was 64% and AAST grade of pancreatic injury and a repeat laparotomy were significant predictors of morbidity. Overall mortality was 15.7%. Most deaths were due to associated injuries and were unrelated to the pancreatic injury. Five variables, age, shock, median number of units transfused and the presence of associated complications were significant factors associated with mortality. These data indicate that the magnitude of blood loss and haemorrhagic shock are primary determinants for survival and that urgent reversal of shock and control of bleeding are essential to reduce mortality in this cohort of patients.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Injury; Morbidity; Mortality; Pancreas; Prognostic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25724398     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  8 in total

1.  Predicting pseudocyst formation following pancreatic trauma in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Bahattin Aydogdu; Serkan Arslan; Hikmet Zeytun; Mehmet Serif Arslan; Erol Basuguy; Mustafa İçer; Cemil Goya; Mehmet Hanifi Okur; Ibrahim Uygun; Murat Kemal Cıgdem; Abdurrahman Onen; Selcuk Otcu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  A Pragmatic Approach to Pancreatic Trauma: A Single-Center Experience From a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Rdr Somasekar; Pothugunta S Krishna; B Kesavan; A Siva Sankar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Management of pancreatic injuries during damage control surgery: an observational outcomes analysis of 79 patients treated at an academic Level 1 trauma centre.

Authors:  J E J Krige; U K Kotze; M Setshedi; A J Nicol; P H Navsaria
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Blame it on the injury: Trauma is a risk factor for pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy compared with elective resection.

Authors:  Noah S Rozich; Katherine T Morris; Tabitha Garwe; Zoona Sarwar; Alessandra Landmann; Chesney B Siems; Alexandra Jones; Casey S Butler; Paul K McGaha; Benjamin C Axtman; Barish H Edil; Jason S Lees
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.697

5.  Resection of complex pancreatic injuries: Benchmarking postoperative complications using the Accordion classification.

Authors:  Jake E Krige; Eduard Jonas; Sandie R Thomson; Urda K Kotze; Mashiko Setshedi; Pradeep H Navsaria; Andrew J Nicol
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-03-27

6.  Management of a complex pancreaticoduodenal lesion following a suicidal attempt with a crossbow.

Authors:  Nadja Benmohamed; Ziad Abbassi; Surennaidoo P Naiken; Philippe Morel; Alexandra Platon; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Christian Toso
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-31

7.  Traumatic Pancreatic Injury Presentation, Management, and Outcome: An Observational Retrospective Study From a Level 1 Trauma Center.

Authors:  Hassan Al-Thani; Ahmed Faidh Ramzee; Ammar Al-Hassani; Gustav Strandvik; Ayman El-Menyar
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-28

Review 8.  Duodeno-pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary tree trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Leslie Kobayashi; Yoram Kluger; Ernest E Moore; Luca Ansaloni; Walt Biffl; Ari Leppaniemi; Goran Augustin; Viktor Reva; Imitiaz Wani; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Enrico Cicuttin; Gustavo Pereira Fraga; Carlos Ordonez; Emmanuil Pikoulis; Maria Grazia Sibilla; Ron Maier; Yosuke Matsumura; Peter T Masiakos; Vladimir Khokha; Alain Chichom Mefire; Rao Ivatury; Francesco Favi; Vassil Manchev; Massimo Sartelli; Fernando Machado; Junichi Matsumoto; Massimo Chiarugi; Catherine Arvieux; Fausto Catena; Raul Coimbra
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.469

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.