Literature DB >> 25724257

Comparison of four chondral repair techniques in the hip joint: a biomechanical study using a physiological human cadaveric model.

A J Cassar-Gheiti1, D P Byrne2, E Kavanagh3, K J Mulhall4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the biomechanical stability of three types of chondral flap repair techniques as well as a hydrogel scaffold implantation on the acetabular articular surface using a physiological human cadaveric model.
METHODS: Chondral flaps were created in the antero-superior zone of the acetabulum in a series of human cadaveric hip joints. The chondral flap was repaired by fibrin glue, cyanoacrylate, suture technique and an agarose hydrogel scaffold sealed with fibrin glue using six hips in each case. After each repair, the specimens were mounted in a validated jig and tested for 1500 gait cycles. In order to determine the stability of the repair, specimens were evaluated arthroscopically at specific intervals.
RESULTS: The fibrin glue and cyanoacrylate techniques were technically the easiest to perform arthroscopically, all flaps repaired with fibrin were detached at 50 cycles while those repaired with cyanoacrylate lasted for an average of 635 cycles. On the other hand, both the suture repair and scaffold implantation techniques were more technically challenging but were both stable till the endpoint of 1500 cycles.
CONCLUSION: Fibrin glue on its own does not provide sufficient fixation to repair chondral flaps on the acetabular surface. Cyanoacrylate repairs universally failed midway through the testing protocol employed here, raising doubts as to the effectiveness of that technique. The suture and hydrogel scaffold technique were the most reliable for chondral repair at any given cycle. The results of this biomechanical study demonstrate the relative effectiveness of chondral repair and fixation techniques.
Copyright © 2015 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage; Chondral repair; Hip joint; Osteoarthritis; Sport injuries

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25724257     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  7 in total

1.  Implant strategy affects scaffold stability and integrity in cartilage treatment.

Authors:  M Drobnic; Francesco Perdisa; E Kon; F Cefalì; M Marcacci; G Filardo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Is There a Scientific Rationale for the Refixation of Delaminated Chondral Flaps in Femoroacetabular Impingement? A Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Clara Levinson; Florian D Naal; Gian M Salzmann; Marcy Zenobi-Wong; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Cartilage status in FAI patients - results from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR).

Authors:  Bent Lund; Torsten Grønbech Nielsen; Martin Lind
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-06-14

Review 4.  Chondral lesions in the hip: a review of relevant anatomy, imaging and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Alison A Dallich; Ehud Rath; Ran Atzmon; Joshua R Radparvar; Andrea Fontana; Zachary Sharfman; Eyal Amar
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2019-04-16

Review 5.  Current surgical options and innovation for repairing articular cartilage defects in the femoral head.

Authors:  Dajiang Du; Peichun Hsu; Zhenzhong Zhu; Changqing Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Unusual apical femoral head deformity treated by hip arthroscopy and tunnel drilling through femoral head: a case report.

Authors:  Boris Morattel; Nicolas Bonin
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2021-06-23

Review 7.  Hydrogels as a Replacement Material for Damaged Articular Hyaline Cartilage.

Authors:  Charlotte M Beddoes; Michael R Whitehouse; Wuge H Briscoe; Bo Su
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.