Literature DB >> 25724174

Genes specifically modulated in sensitized skins allow the detection of sensitizers in a reconstructed human skin model. Development of the SENS-IS assay.

Françoise Cottrez1, Elodie Boitel1, Claude Auriault1, Pierre Aeby1, Hervé Groux2.   

Abstract

Analysis of genes modulated during the sensitization process either on mice (LLNA) or human (blisters) combined with data mining has allowed the definition of a comprehensive panel of sensitization biomarkers. This set of genes includes already identified markers such as the ARE family and others not yet associated with the sensitization process (the so-called SENS-IS gene subset). The expression of this set of genes has been measured on reconstituted human epidermis models (Episkin) exposed to various sensitizers and non-sensitizers. Fine analysis of their expression pattern indicates that it is the number of modulated genes rather than the intensity of up-regulation that correlates best with the sensitization potential of a chemical. Moreover, sensitizers that are weak inductors of ARE genes tend to be relevant modulators of the SENS-IS subset. By combining the expression data obtained with both gene subsets, it is now possible to identify a wide variety of sensitizers on a test system (in vitro reconstructed human epidermis) that is very similar to the in vivo situation and compatible with a large variety of test substance characteristics.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternatives to animal tests; Reconstituted epidermis; SENS-IS; Skin sensitization; Toxicogenomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25724174     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  12 in total

Review 1.  Biology-inspired microphysiological system approaches to solve the prediction dilemma of substance testing.

Authors:  Uwe Marx; Tommy B Andersson; Anthony Bahinski; Mario Beilmann; Sonja Beken; Flemming R Cassee; Murat Cirit; Mardas Daneshian; Susan Fitzpatrick; Olivier Frey; Claudia Gaertner; Christoph Giese; Linda Griffith; Thomas Hartung; Minne B Heringa; Julia Hoeng; Wim H de Jong; Hajime Kojima; Jochen Kuehnl; Marcel Leist; Andreas Luch; Ilka Maschmeyer; Dmitry Sakharov; Adrienne J A M Sips; Thomas Steger-Hartmann; Danilo A Tagle; Alexander Tonevitsky; Tewes Tralau; Sergej Tsyb; Anja van de Stolpe; Rob Vandebriel; Paul Vulto; Jufeng Wang; Joachim Wiest; Marleen Rodenburg; Adrian Roth
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 6.043

2.  Progress on Reconstructed Human Skin Models for Allergy Research and Identifying Contact Sensitizers.

Authors:  Charlotte Rodrigues Neves; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  Perspectives on In Vitro to In Vivo Extrapolations.

Authors:  Thomas Hartung
Journal:  Appl In Vitro Toxicol       Date:  2018-12-08

Review 4.  Testing Human Skin and Respiratory Sensitizers-What Is Good Enough?

Authors:  Anki Malmborg; Carl A K Borrebaeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Validation of the GARD™skin Assay for Assessment of Chemical Skin Sensitizers: Ring Trial Results of Predictive Performance and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Henrik Johansson; Robin Gradin; Angelica Johansson; Els Adriaens; Amber Edwards; Veronika Zuckerstätter; Anders Jerre; Florence Burleson; Helge Gehrke; Erwin L Roggen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Contact Allergy-Emerging Allergens and Public Health Impact.

Authors:  Wolfgang Uter; Thomas Werfel; Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin; Ian R White
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Determination of Chemical Irritation Potential Using a Defined Gene Signature Set on Tissue-Engineered Human Skin Equivalents.

Authors:  Amy L Harding; Craig Murdoch; Simon Danby; Md Zobaer Hasan; Hirofumi Nakanishi; Tetsuo Furuno; Sirwan Hadad; Robert Turner; Helen E Colley
Journal:  JID Innov       Date:  2021-03-15

8.  Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients.

Authors:  Mihwa Na; Devin O'Brien; Maura Lavelle; Isabelle Lee; G Frank Gerberick; Anne Marie Api
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 4.867

9.  Anti-Irritant Strategy against Retinol Based on the Genetic Analysis of Korean Population: A Genetically Guided Top-Down Approach.

Authors:  Seongsu Kang; Kyunghoe Kim; Seung-Hyun Jun; Seonju Lee; Juhyun Kim; Joong-Gon Shin; Yunkwan Kim; Mina Kim; Sun-Gyoo Park; Nae-Gyu Kang
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.321

10.  The Inflammatory Response in Human Keratinocytes Exposed to Cinnamaldehyde Is Regulated by Nrf2.

Authors:  Romain Vallion; Kévin Hardonnière; Abderrahmane Bouredji; Marie-Hélène Damiens; Claudine Deloménie; Marc Pallardy; Pierre-Jacques Ferret; Saadia Kerdine-Römer
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.