Marie-Claude Boily1, Michael Pickles, Michel Alary, Stefan Baral, James Blanchard, Stephen Moses, Peter Vickerman, Sharmistha Mishra. 1. *Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom; †Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Laval, Quebec, Canada; ‡Center for Public Health and Human Rights, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; §Centre for Global Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; ‖School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; and ¶Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HIV epidemics have traditionally been classified as "concentrated" among key populations if overall HIV prevalence was below 1% and as "generalized" otherwise. We aimed to objectively determine the utility of this classification by determining how high overall HIV prevalence can reach in epidemics driven by unprotected sex work (SW) and how estimates of the contribution of SW to HIV transmission changes over time in these epidemics. METHODS: We developed a deterministic model of HIV transmission specific to West and Central Africa to simulate 1000 synthetic HIV epidemics, where SW is the sole behavioral driver that sustains HIV in the population (ie, truly concentrated epidemics), and it is based on a systematic extraction of model parameters specific to West and Central Africa. We determined the range of plausible HIV prevalence in the total population over time and calculated the population attributable fraction (PAF) of SW over different time periods. RESULTS: In 1988 and 2008, HIV prevalence across the 1000 synthetic concentrated HIV epidemics ranged (5th-95th percentile) between 0.1%-4.2% and 0.1%-2.8%, respectively. The maximum HIV prevalence peaked at 12%. The PAF of SW measured from 2008 over 1 year was <5%-18% compared with 16%-59% over 20 years in these SW-driven epidemics. CONCLUSIONS: Even high HIV-prevalence epidemics can be driven by unprotected SW and therefore concentrated. Overall, HIV prevalence and the short-term PAF are poor makers of underlying transmission dynamics and underestimate the role of SW in HIV epidemics and thus should not be used alone to inform HIV programs.
BACKGROUND: HIV epidemics have traditionally been classified as "concentrated" among key populations if overall HIV prevalence was below 1% and as "generalized" otherwise. We aimed to objectively determine the utility of this classification by determining how high overall HIV prevalence can reach in epidemics driven by unprotected sex work (SW) and how estimates of the contribution of SW to HIV transmission changes over time in these epidemics. METHODS: We developed a deterministic model of HIV transmission specific to West and Central Africa to simulate 1000 synthetic HIV epidemics, where SW is the sole behavioral driver that sustains HIV in the population (ie, truly concentrated epidemics), and it is based on a systematic extraction of model parameters specific to West and Central Africa. We determined the range of plausible HIV prevalence in the total population over time and calculated the population attributable fraction (PAF) of SW over different time periods. RESULTS: In 1988 and 2008, HIV prevalence across the 1000 synthetic concentrated HIV epidemics ranged (5th-95th percentile) between 0.1%-4.2% and 0.1%-2.8%, respectively. The maximum HIV prevalence peaked at 12%. The PAF of SW measured from 2008 over 1 year was <5%-18% compared with 16%-59% over 20 years in these SW-driven epidemics. CONCLUSIONS: Even high HIV-prevalence epidemics can be driven by unprotected SW and therefore concentrated. Overall, HIV prevalence and the short-term PAF are poor makers of underlying transmission dynamics and underestimate the role of SW in HIV epidemics and thus should not be used alone to inform HIV programs.
Authors: Katrina F Ortblad; Jared M Baeten; Peter Cherutich; Joyce Njeri Wamicwe; Judith N Wasserheit Journal: Curr Opin HIV AIDS Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 4.283
Authors: Lina M Nerlander; Kristen L Hess; Catlainn Sionean; Charles E Rose; Anna Thorson; Dita Broz; Gabriela Paz-Bailey Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-08
Authors: Xiaoyue Maggie Niu; Amrita Rao; David Chen; Ben Sheng; Sharon Weir; Eric Umar; Gift Trapence; Vincent Jumbe; Dunker Kamba; Katherine Rucinski; Nikita Viswasam; Stefan Baral; Le Bao Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Kate M Mitchell; Holly J Prudden; Reynold Washington; Shajy Isac; Subramanian P Rajaram; Anna M Foss; Fern Terris-Prestholt; Marie-Claude Boily; Peter Vickerman Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Jerry O Jacobson; Carmen Cueto; Jennifer L Smith; Jimee Hwang; Roly Gosling; Adam Bennett Journal: Malar J Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Erik M Volz; Nicaise Ndembi; Rebecca Nowak; Gustavo H Kijak; John Idoko; Patrick Dakum; Walter Royal; Stefan Baral; Mark Dybul; William A Blattner; Man Charurat Journal: Virus Evol Date: 2017-07-28