Literature DB >> 25723097

Regulatory challenges and approaches to characterize nanomedicines and their follow-on similars.

Stefan Mühlebach1, Gerrit Borchard, Selcan Yildiz.   

Abstract

Nanomedicines are highly complex products and are the result of difficult to control manufacturing processes. Nonbiological complex drugs and their biological counterparts can comprise nanoparticles and therefore show nanomedicine characteristics. They consist of not fully known nonhomomolecular structures, and can therefore not be characterized by physicochemical means only. Also, intended copies of nanomedicines (follow-on similars) may have clinically meaningful differences, creating the regulatory challenge of how to grant a high degree of assurance for patients' benefit and safety. As an example, the current regulatory approach for marketing authorization of intended copies of nonbiological complex drugs appears inappropriate; also, a valid strategy incorporating the complexity of such systems is undefined. To demonstrate sufficient similarity and comparability, a stepwise quality, nonclinical and clinical approach is necessary to obtain market authorization for follow-on products as therapeutic alternatives, substitution and/or interchangeable products. To fill the regulatory gap, harmonized and science-based standards are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glatiramoids; liposomes; nanocolloidal iron carbohydrates; nanomedicines; nanosimilars; nonbiological complex drugs; stepwise regulatory approach for follow-on versions

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25723097     DOI: 10.2217/nnm.14.189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)        ISSN: 1743-5889            Impact factor:   5.307


  7 in total

1.  Reflections on FDA Draft Guidance for Products Containing Nanomaterials: Is the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) a Suitable Pathway for Nanomedicines?

Authors:  Marden Emily; Ntai Ioanna; Bass Scott; Flühmann Beat
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Nanoparticles in Daily Life: Applications, Toxicity and Regulations.

Authors:  Ritu Gupta; Huan Xie
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.567

3.  Intravenous Iron-Carbohydrate Nanoparticles and Their Similars. What Do We Choose?

Authors:  Ana Maria Mehedinti; Cristina Capusa; Iuliana Andreiana; Gabriel Mircescu
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-06

Review 4.  Nanomedicine: Principles, Properties, and Regulatory Issues.

Authors:  Sara Soares; João Sousa; Alberto Pais; Carla Vitorino
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 5.  Differences between intravenous iron products: focus on treatment of iron deficiency in chronic heart failure patients.

Authors:  Alejandro Martin-Malo; Gerrit Borchard; Beat Flühmann; Claudio Mori; Donald Silverberg; Ewa A Jankowska
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-01-29

6.  Future perspectives for advancing regulatory science of nanotechnology-enabled health products.

Authors:  Blanka Halamoda-Kenzaoui; Robert Geertsma; Joost Pouw; Adriele Prina-Mello; Moreno Carrer; Matthias Roesslein; Adrienne Sips; Klaus Michael Weltring; Kathleen Spring; Susanne Bremer-Hoffmann
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 5.671

7.  Assessment of Dextran Antigenicity of Intravenous Iron Preparations with Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA).

Authors:  Susann Neiser; Taija S Koskenkorva; Katrin Schwarz; Maria Wilhelm; Susanna Burckhardt
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.