UNLABELLED: (86)Y (half-life = 14.74 h, 33% β(+)) is within an emerging class of positron-emitting isotopes with relatively long physical half-lives that enables extended imaging of biologic processes. We report the synthesis and evaluation of 3 low-molecular-weight compounds labeled with (86)Y for imaging the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) using PET. Impetus for the study derives from the need to perform dosimetry estimates for the corresponding (90)Y-labeled radiotherapeutics. METHODS: Multistep syntheses were used in preparing (86)Y- 4: - 6: PSMA inhibition constants were evaluated by competitive binding assay. In vivo characterization using tumor-bearing male mice was performed by PET/CT for (86)Y- 4: - 6: and by biodistribution studies of (86)Y- 4: and (86)Y- 6: out to 24 h after injection. Quantitative whole-body PET scans were recorded to measure the kinetics for 14 organs in a male baboon using (86)Y- 6 RESULTS: Compounds (86)Y- 4: - 6: were obtained in high radiochemical yield and purity, with specific radioactivities of more than 83.92 GBq/μmol. PET imaging and biodistribution studies using PSMA-positive PC-3 PIP and PSMA-negative PC-3 flu tumor-bearing mice revealed that (86)Y- 4-6: had high site-specific uptake in PSMA-positive PC-3 PIP tumor starting at 20 min after injection and remained high at 24 h. Compound (86)Y- 6: demonstrated the highest tumor uptake and retention, with 32.17 ± 7.99 and 15.79 ± 6.44 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) at 5 and 24 h, respectively. Low activity concentrations were associated with blood and normal organs, except for the kidneys, a PSMA-expressing tissue. PET imaging in baboons reveals that all organs have a 2-phase (rapid and slow) clearance, with the highest uptake (8 %ID/g) in the kidneys at 25 min. The individual absolute uptake kinetics were used to calculate radiation doses using the OLINDA/EXM software. The highest mean absorbed dose was received by the renal cortex, with 1.9 mGy per MBq of (86)Y- 6: CONCLUSION: Compound (86)Y- 6: is a promising candidate for quantitative PET imaging of PSMA-expressing tumors. Dosimetry calculations indicate promise for future (90)Y or other radiometals that could use a similar chelator/scaffold combination for radiopharmaceutical therapy based on the structure of 6.
UNLABELLED: (86)Y (half-life = 14.74 h, 33% β(+)) is within an emerging class of positron-emitting isotopes with relatively long physical half-lives that enables extended imaging of biologic processes. We report the synthesis and evaluation of 3 low-molecular-weight compounds labeled with (86)Y for imaging the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) using PET. Impetus for the study derives from the need to perform dosimetry estimates for the corresponding (90)Y-labeled radiotherapeutics. METHODS: Multistep syntheses were used in preparing (86)Y- 4: - 6: PSMA inhibition constants were evaluated by competitive binding assay. In vivo characterization using tumor-bearing male mice was performed by PET/CT for (86)Y- 4: - 6: and by biodistribution studies of (86)Y- 4: and (86)Y- 6: out to 24 h after injection. Quantitative whole-body PET scans were recorded to measure the kinetics for 14 organs in a male baboon using (86)Y- 6 RESULTS: Compounds (86)Y- 4: - 6: were obtained in high radiochemical yield and purity, with specific radioactivities of more than 83.92 GBq/μmol. PET imaging and biodistribution studies using PSMA-positive PC-3PIP and PSMA-negative PC-3flu tumor-bearing mice revealed that (86)Y- 4-6: had high site-specific uptake in PSMA-positive PC-3PIP tumor starting at 20 min after injection and remained high at 24 h. Compound (86)Y- 6: demonstrated the highest tumor uptake and retention, with 32.17 ± 7.99 and 15.79 ± 6.44 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) at 5 and 24 h, respectively. Low activity concentrations were associated with blood and normal organs, except for the kidneys, a PSMA-expressing tissue. PET imaging in baboons reveals that all organs have a 2-phase (rapid and slow) clearance, with the highest uptake (8 %ID/g) in the kidneys at 25 min. The individual absolute uptake kinetics were used to calculate radiation doses using the OLINDA/EXM software. The highest mean absorbed dose was received by the renal cortex, with 1.9 mGy per MBq of (86)Y- 6: CONCLUSION: Compound (86)Y- 6: is a promising candidate for quantitative PET imaging of PSMA-expressing tumors. Dosimetry calculations indicate promise for future (90)Y or other radiometals that could use a similar chelator/scaffold combination for radiopharmaceutical therapy based on the structure of 6.
Authors: D Ma; M R McDevitt; E Barendswaard; L Lai; M J Curcio; V Pellegrini; M W Brechbiel; D A Scheinberg Journal: Leukemia Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Neil H Bander; Matthew I Milowsky; David M Nanus; Lale Kostakoglu; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Stanley J Goldsmith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-04-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas E Witzig; Christine A White; Leo I Gordon; Gregory A Wiseman; Christos Emmanouilides; James L Murray; John Lister; Pratik S Multani Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stig Palm; Richard M Enmon; Cornelia Matei; Katherine S Kolbert; Su Xu; Pat B Zanzonico; Ronald L Finn; Jason A Koutcher; Steven M Larson; George Sgouros Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Steve Y Cho; Kenneth L Gage; Ronnie C Mease; Srinivasan Senthamizhchelvan; Daniel P Holt; Akimosa Jeffrey-Kwanisai; Christopher J Endres; Robert F Dannals; George Sgouros; Martin Lodge; Mario A Eisenberger; Ronald Rodriguez; Michael A Carducci; Camilo Rojas; Barbara S Slusher; Alan P Kozikowski; Martin G Pomper Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Andreas Helisch; Gregor J Förster; Helmut Reber; Hans-Georg Buchholz; Rudolf Arnold; Burkhard Göke; Matthias M Weber; Bertram Wiedenmann; Stanislas Pauwels; Ulrike Haus; Hakim Bouterfa; Peter Bartenstein Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sangeeta R Banerjee; Catherine A Foss; Mark Castanares; Ronnie C Mease; Youngjoo Byun; James J Fox; John Hilton; Shawn E Lupold; Alan P Kozikowski; Martin G Pomper Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2008-07-19 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: B L R Kam; J J M Teunissen; E P Krenning; W W de Herder; S Khan; E I van Vliet; D J Kwekkeboom Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Xing Yang; Ronnie C Mease; Mrudula Pullambhatla; Ala Lisok; Ying Chen; Catherine A Foss; Yuchuan Wang; Hassan Shallal; Hannah Edelman; Adam T Hoye; Giorgio Attardo; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Martin G Pomper Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Sangeeta Ray Banerjee; Vivek Kumar; Ala Lisok; Donika Plyku; Zora Nováková; Mary Brummet; Bryan Wharram; Cyril Barinka; Robert Hobbs; Martin G Pomper Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Eric W Price; Kimberly J Edwards; Kathryn E Carnazza; Sean D Carlin; Brian M Zeglis; Michael J Adam; Chris Orvig; Jason S Lewis Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Sangeeta Ray Banerjee; Zhengping Chen; Mrudula Pullambhatla; Ala Lisok; Jian Chen; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Lily Li; María de Guadalupe Jaraquemada-Peláez; Eduardo Aluicio-Sarduy; Xiaozhu Wang; Todd E Barnhart; Weibo Cai; Valery Radchenko; Paul Schaffer; Jonathan W Engle; Chris Orvig Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Sangeeta Ray Banerjee; Vivek Kumar; Ala Lisok; Jian Chen; Il Minn; Mary Brummet; Srikanth Boinapally; Michael Cole; Ethel Ngen; Bryan Wharram; Cory Brayton; Robert F Hobbs; Martin G Pomper Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sangeeta Ray Banerjee; Ethel J Ngen; Matthew W Rotz; Samata Kakkad; Ala Lisok; Richard Pracitto; Mrudula Pullambhatla; Zhengping Chen; Tariq Shah; Dmitri Artemov; Thomas J Meade; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Martin G Pomper Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-07-23 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: A P Kiess; S R Banerjee; R C Mease; S P Rowe; A Rao; C A Foss; Y Chen; X Yang; S Y Cho; S Nimmagadda; M G Pomper Journal: Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 2.346