Literature DB >> 25722192

Isocline analysis of competition predicts stable coexistence of two amphibians.

Andrea Gazzola1, Josh Van Buskirk.   

Abstract

We investigated the interaction between larvae of two anuran amphibian species (Rana temporaria and Bufo bufo) to test models of two-species competition. The study had a response surface experimental design with four replicates, each consisting of 24 density combinations. Larval performance-and, by assumption, change in population size-was defined by a linear combination of survival, growth, and development. We fit six competition models from the literature and discovered that density dependence was strongly non-linear, with the highest support for the Hassel-Comins model. Rana temporaria was competitively superior to B. bufo; the impacts of both species on growth and development were about five- to tenfold greater than those on survival. Isocline analysis predicted a stable configuration, which agrees with the observation that these two species are syntopic in nature. The results of this study confirm competition theory by identifying a model structure that agrees with data and making predictions that are broadly supportive of the observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25722192     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3273-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

1.  Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs.

Authors:  Res Altwegg; Heinz-Ulrich Reyer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Multilevel statistical models and the analysis of experimental data.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Behm; Devin A Edmonds; Jason P Harmon; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Competition and coexistence with multiple life-history stages.

Authors:  Jason D Moll; Joel S Brown
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Local and landscape determinants of amphibian communities in urban ponds.

Authors:  Andrew J Hamer; Kirsten M Parris
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Insect herbivores change the outcome of plant competition through both inter- and intraspecific processes.

Authors:  Tania N Kim; Nora Underwood; Brian D Inouye
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Environmental stress, facilitation, competition, and coexistence.

Authors:  Simon P Hart; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Multistage density dependence in an amphibian.

Authors:  Res Altwegg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle.

Authors:  Michael E Hibbing; Clay Fuqua; Matthew R Parsek; S Brook Peterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 60.633

9.  Evolutionary trade-off between defence against grazing and competitive ability in a simple unicellular alga, Chlorella vulgaris.

Authors:  Takehito Yoshida; Nelson G Hairston; Stephen P Ellner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Competitive exclusion of a worldwide invasive pest by a native. Quantifying competition between two phytophagous insects on two host plant species.

Authors:  Dean R Paini; Joe E Funderburk; Stuart R Reitz
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  1 in total

1.  A matter of proportion? Associational effects in larval anuran communities under fish predation.

Authors:  Jan M Kaczmarek; Mikołaj Kaczmarski; Jan Mazurkiewicz; Janusz Kloskowski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.225

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.