Literature DB >> 25722074

Differences in contraceptive use between family planning providers and the U.S. population: results of a nationwide survey.

Lisa F Stern1, Hannah R Simons2, Julia E Kohn2, Elie J Debevec2, Johanna M Morfesis2, Ashlesha A Patel3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe contraceptive use among U.S. female family planning providers and to compare their contraceptive choices to the general population. STUDY
DESIGN: We surveyed a convenience sample of female family planning providers ages 25-44 years, including physicians and advanced practice clinicians, via an internet-based survey from April to May 2013. Family planning providers were compared to female respondents ages 25-44 years from the 2011-2013 National Survey of Family Growth.
RESULTS: A total of 488 responses were eligible for analysis; 331 respondents (67.8%) were using a contraceptive method. Providers' contraceptive use differed markedly from that of the general population, with providers significantly more likely to use intrauterine contraception, an implant, and the vaginal ring. Providers were significantly less likely to use female sterilization and condoms. There were no significant differences between providers and the general population in use of partner vasectomy or the pill. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) use was significantly higher among providers than in the general population (41.7% vs. 12.1%, p<.001). These results were consistent when stratifying by variables including self-identified race/ethnicity and educational level.
CONCLUSIONS: The contraceptive choices of this sample of female family planning providers differed significantly from the general population. These findings have implications for clinical practice, patient education, and health policy. IMPLICATIONS: Family planning providers report higher use of LARC than the general population. This may reflect differences in preferences and access. Providers might consider sharing these findings with patients, while maintaining patient choice and autonomy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth control; Contraception; Family planning providers; IUD; Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC); NSFG

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25722074     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  4 in total

1.  Results of the National Contraception Survey Conducted by Sociedad Española de Contracepción (2020).

Authors:  Fatima Leon-Larios; José Gutiérrez Ales; María José Puente Martínez; Marta Correa Rancel; Isabel Lahoz Pascual; Isabel Silva Reus; José Cruz Quílez Conde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Health Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Around Fertility Awareness-Based Methods in Title X Clinics in the United States.

Authors:  Shelby Webb; An-Lin Cheng; Rebecca Simmons; Rachel Peragallo Urrutia; Victoria Jennings; Jacki Witt
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-09-15

3.  Long-acting reversible contraception use among residents in obstetrics/gynecology training programs.

Authors:  Rachel E Zigler; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Ragini Maddipati; Colleen McNicholas
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2017-01-10

4.  Pregnant or recently pregnant opioid users: contraception decisions, perceptions and preferences.

Authors:  Rebecca L Fischbein; Bethany G Lanese; Lynn Falletta; Kelsey Hamilton; Jennifer A King; Deric R Kenne
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2018-03-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.