Literature DB >> 25721818

Italian multicentre study on type A acute aortic dissection: a 33-year follow-up†.

Claudio F Russo1, Giovanni Mariscalco2, Andrea Colli3, Pasquale Santè4, Francesco Nicolini5, Antonio Miceli6, Benedetta De Chiara7, Cesare Beghi2, Gino Gerosa3, Mattia Glauber6, Tiziano Gherli5, Gianantonio Nappi4, Michele Murzi6, Alberto Molardi5, Bruno Merlanti7, Enrico Vizzardi8, Ivano Bonadei8, Giuseppe Coletti9, Massimiliano Carrozzini3, Sandro Gelsomino10, Antonio Caiazzo4, Roberto Lorusso9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite substantial progress in surgical techniques and perioperative management, the treatment and long-term follow-up of type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) still remain a major challenge. The objective of this retrospective, multicentre study was to assess in a large series of patients the early and long-term results after surgery for type A AAD.
METHODS: We analysed the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative conditions of 1.148 consecutive patients surgically treated in seven large referral centres from 1981 to 2013. We applied to each patient three different multi-parameter risk profiles (preadmission risk, admission risk and post-surgery risk) in order to compare risk factors and outcome. Long-term Kaplan-Meier survival was evaluated.
RESULTS: The median age was 64 years and the male population was predominant (66%). Identified diagnosis of collagen disease was present in 9%, and Marfan syndrome in 5%. Bicuspid aortic valve was present in 69 patients (6%). Previous cardiac surgery was identified in 10% of the patients. During surgery, the native aortic valve was preserved in 72% of the cases, including leaflet resuspension in 23% and David operation in 1.2%. Considering aortic valve replacement (AVR: 28%), bioprosthesis implantation was performed in 14.7% of the subjects. Neurological impairment at discharge was shown in 23% of the cases among which 21% of patients had new neurological impairment versus preoperative conditions. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 25.7%. All risk profiles remained independently associated with in-hospital mortality. During the available follow-up of hospital survivors (median: 70 months, interquartile range: 34-113, maximum: 396), cardiac-related death occurred in 7.9% of the subjects. The cumulative survival rate for cardiac death was 95.3% at 5 years, 92.8% at 10 years and 52.8% at 20 years. Severe aortic regurgitation (AR) (grade 3-4) at the time of surgery showed to be a significant risk factor for reintervention during the follow-up (P < 0.001). Among risk profiles, only the preadmission risk was independently associated with late mortality after multivariate analysis. Unexpectedly, there was no difference in freedom from cardiac death between patients with and without AVR.
CONCLUSIONS: Although surgery for type A has remained challenging over more than three decades, there is a positive trend in terms of hospital mortality and long-term follow-up. About 90% of patients were free from reoperation in the long term, although late AR remains a critical issue, suggesting that a thorough debate on surgical options, assessment and results of a conservative approach should be considered.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute aortic dissection; Aortic prosthesis; Aortic surgery; Aortic valve; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25721818     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of early and long-term outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection according to the new international aortic arch surgery study group recommendations.

Authors:  Andrea Colli; Massimiliano Carrozzini; Marco Galuppo; Marina Comisso; Francesca Toto; Dario Gregori; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Descending endografts for type A dissections: con.

Authors:  Akiko Tanaka; Harleen K Sandhu; Anthony L Estrera
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-05

3.  Preliminary evaluation of the Chinese version of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system 29-item profile in patients with aortic dissection.

Authors:  Wanbing Huang; Qiansheng Wu; Yufen Zhang; Chong Tian; Haishan Huang; Sufang Huang; Yanrong Zhou; Jing He; Hui Wang
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Impact of ascending aortic, hemiarch and arch repair on early and long-term outcomes in patients with Stanford A acute aortic dissection.

Authors:  Julia Merkle; Anton Sabashnikov; Antje-Christin Deppe; Mohamed Zeriouh; Johanna Maier; Carolyn Weber; Kaveh Eghbalzadeh; Georg Schlachtenberger; Olga Shostak; Ilija Djordjevic; Elmar Kuhn; Parwis B Rahmanian; Navid Madershahian; Christian Rustenbach; Oliver Liakopoulos; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Ferdinand Kuhn-Régnier; Thorsten Wahlers
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-10-08

5.  Late Echocardiographic Study of Aortic Valve and Aortic Root after Surgery for Type A Acute Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Martina Molteni; Benedetta De Chiara; Francesca Casadei; Luca Botta; Bruno Merlanti; Claudio Francesco Russo; Cristina Giannattasio; Antonella Moreo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

Review 6.  Unwarranted Variation in the Quality of Care for Patients With Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta.

Authors:  Alex Bottle; Giovanni Mariscalco; Matthew A Shaw; Umberto Benedetto; Athanasios Saratzis; Silvia Mariani; Mohamad Bashir; Paul Aylin; David Jenkins; Aung Y Oo; Gavin J Murphy
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.