Literature DB >> 25721150

Novel Oral Anticoagulants for DC Cardioversion Procedures: Utilization and Clinical Outcomes Compared with Warfarin.

Corey M Coleman1, Shaden Khalaf1, Steven Mould1, Oussama Wazni1, Mohamed Kanj1, Walid Saliba1, Daniel Cantillon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) agents dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban are increasingly utilized as thromboembolic prevention for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing direct current cardioversion (DCCV) with post hoc analyses of clinical trials suggesting satisfactory safety and efficacy. This study characterizes utilization, effectiveness, and complications of NOAC agents for stroke prophylaxis in the setting of DCCV.
METHODS: Comparison of warfarin and NOAC agents as periprocedural anticoagulation for DCCV procedures performed at Cleveland Clinic from January 2009 through December 2013. Variables of interest include utilization rates for each NOAC agent stratified by clinical parameters including CHADS2 score, and associated clinical outcomes including cerebrovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), peripheral arterial embolism (PAE), and bleeding events during 8 weeks of postprocedure follow-up.
RESULTS: Among 5,320 DCCV procedures, 673 (12.6%) cases were excluded due to inadequate follow-up. Warfarin was utilized in 3,721 (80.1%), dabigatran in 719 (15.5%), rivaroxaban in 159 (3.4%), and apixaban in 48 (1.0%) with a steady increase in NOAC utilization from 2011 to 2013. There were low rates of CVA/TIA (warfarin: 0.97% vs NOAC 1.62%, P = 0.162) and bleeding (warfarin: 1.02% vs NOAC: 0.5%, P = 0.247) and no significant differences detected between agents. Higher CHADS2 /CHA2 DS2 -VASC scores were associated with thromboembolic and bleeding risk. Increasing age, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, coronary disease, and deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism were associated with increased bleeding risk.
CONCLUSION: In a high-volume, single-center experience, NOAC utilization has grown to account for over a third of cardioversion procedures, and these agents appear safe and effective compared to warfarin with low rates of thromboembolic and bleeding complications. ©2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apixaban; atrial arrhythmias; atrial fibrillation; cardioversion; dabigatran; oral anticoagulation; rivaroxaban; stroke prophylaxis; warfarin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25721150     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  12 in total

Review 1.  A Comparison Between NOACs and Warfarin on Time to Elective Cardioversion.

Authors:  Siva Krothapalli; Prashant D Bhave
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-08-31

2.  A Comparison Between Dabigatran and Warfarin on Time to Elective Cardioversion.

Authors:  Amanda N Basto; Nathan P Fewel; Rajiv Gupta; Eileen M Stock; Mia Mia Ta
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-04-30

Review 3.  Management of Patients on Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in the Acute Care and Periprocedural Setting: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Amish N Raval; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Mina K Chung; Larry J Diaz-Sandoval; Deborah Diercks; Jonathan P Piccini; Hee Soo Jung; Jeffrey B Washam; Babu G Welch; Allyson R Zazulia; Sean P Collins
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  The Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Atrial Fibrillation: Challenges and Considerations.

Authors:  Anna Plitt; Sameer Bansilal
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-02-28

5.  Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model to Predict the Effects of Commonly Used Anticoagulants on the Human Coagulation Network.

Authors:  S Hartmann; K Biliouris; L J Lesko; U Nowak-Göttl; M N Trame
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-20

6.  Croatia needs a registry of patients undergoing direct current cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter.

Authors:  Mia Dubravčić; Petra Cukon; Siniša Car; Davor Puljević; Vladimir Trkulja
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.351

7.  Changes in oral anticoagulation for elective cardioversion: results from a European cardioversion registry.

Authors:  Judit Papp; Endre Zima; Ramon Bover; Rasa Karaliute; Andrea Rossi; Catherine Szymanski; Rossella Troccoli; Jonas Schneider; Morten Wang Fagerland; A John Camm; Dan Atar
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother       Date:  2017-07-01

8.  Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Naoki Shibata; Itsuro Morishima; Kenji Okumura; Yasuhiro Morita; Kensuke Takagi; Ruka Yoshida; Hiroaki Nagai; Toshiro Tomomatsu; Yoshihiro Ikai; Kazushi Terada; Kazuhito Tsuzuki; Hideyuki Tsuboi; Takahito Sone; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-06-01

9.  Are Three Weeks of Oral Anticoagulation Sufficient for Safe Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation?

Authors:  Stefan Naydenov; Nikolay Runev; Emil Manov
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 10.  Periprocedural anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation: Update on electrical cardioversion and ablation.

Authors:  S P G van Vugt; M A Brouwer
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.