| Literature DB >> 25721146 |
Angela L Rollins1,2, John H McGrew3, Marina Kukla4,5, Alan B McGuire6,7, Mindy E Flanagan8, Marcia G Hunt9, Doug L Leslie10, Linda A Collins11, Jennifer L Wright-Berryman12, Lia J Hicks13, Michelle P Salyers14.
Abstract
Assertive community treatment is known for improving consumer outcomes, but is difficult to implement. On-site fidelity measurement can help ensure model adherence, but is costly in large systems. This study compared reliability and validity of three methods of fidelity assessment (on-site, phone-administered, and expert-scored self-report) using a stratified random sample of 32 mental health intensive case management teams from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Overall, phone, and to a lesser extent, expert-scored self-report fidelity assessments compared favorably to on-site methods in inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity. If used appropriately, these alternative protocols hold promise in monitoring large-scale program fidelity with limited resources.Keywords: Assertive community treatment; Fidelity; Implementation; Quality measurement
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 25721146 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-015-0641-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health ISSN: 0894-587X