Background/Aims: The distribution of infusate into the brain by convection-enhanced delivery can be affected by backflow along the catheter shaft. This work assesses the following: (1) whether tissue coring and occlusion of the catheter lumen occurs when an open end-port catheter is inserted, (2) whether there is a relationship between intracatheter pressure and backflow, and (3) whether catheter occlusion increases backflow. Methods: Freshly excised monkey brains were used to assess tissue coring and its correlation with the behavior of the line pressure. In vivo infusions of gadolinium solution into monkey putamen at 1 μl/min were conducted with and without a stylet during insertion. The effect of flow during insertion was evaluated in vivo in the pig thalamus. MRI and line pressure were continuously monitored during in vivo infusions. Results: Ex vivo testing showed that open end-port insertions always cored tissue (which temporarily plugs the catheter tip) and increased pressure followed by a rapid fall after its expulsion. Catheter insertion with a stylet in place prevented coring but not flow insertion; neither affected backflow. Conclusion: Open end-port catheters occlude during insertion, which can be prevented by temporarily closing the port with a stylet but not by infusing while inserting. Backflow was not completely prevented by any insertion method.
Background/Aims: The distribution of infusate into the brain by convection-enhanced delivery can be affected by backflow along the catheter shaft. This work assesses the following: (1) whether tissue coring and occlusion of the catheter lumen occurs when an open end-port catheter is inserted, (2) whether there is a relationship between intracatheter pressure and backflow, and (3) whether catheter occlusion increases backflow. Methods: Freshly excised monkey brains were used to assess tissue coring and its correlation with the behavior of the line pressure. In vivo infusions of gadolinium solution into monkey putamen at 1 μl/min were conducted with and without a stylet during insertion. The effect of flow during insertion was evaluated in vivo in the pig thalamus. MRI and line pressure were continuously monitored during in vivo infusions. Results: Ex vivo testing showed that open end-port insertions always cored tissue (which temporarily plugs the catheter tip) and increased pressure followed by a rapid fall after its expulsion. Catheter insertion with a stylet in place prevented coring but not flow insertion; neither affected backflow. Conclusion: Open end-port catheters occlude during insertion, which can be prevented by temporarily closing the port with a stylet but not by infusing while inserting. Backflow was not completely prevented by any insertion method.
Authors: R Mark Richardson; Adrian P Kells; Alastair J Martin; Paul S Larson; Philip A Starr; Peter G Piferi; Geoffrey Bates; Lisa Tansey; Kathryn H Rosenbluth; John R Bringas; Mitchel S Berger; Krystof S Bankiewicz Journal: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: R H Bobo; D W Laske; A Akbasak; P F Morrison; R L Dedrick; E H Oldfield Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1994-03-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Marina E Emborg; Valerie Joers; Ronald Fisher; Kevin Brunner; Victoria Carter; Chris Ross; Raghu Raghavan; Martin Brady; James Raschke; Ken Kubota; Andrew Alexander Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Karl A Sillay; L M Kumbier; C Ross; M Brady; A Alexander; A Gupta; N Adluru; G S Miranpuri; J C Williams Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Martin L Brady; Raghu Raghavan; Andrew Alexander; Ken Kubota; Karl Sillay; Marina E Emborg Journal: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: Seunguk Oh; Rick Odland; Scott R Wilson; Kurt M Kroeger; Chunyan Liu; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro; Walter A Hall; John R Ohlfest Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Michael G Kaplitt; Andrew Feigin; Chengke Tang; Helen L Fitzsimons; Paul Mattis; Patricia A Lawlor; Ross J Bland; Deborah Young; Kristin Strybing; David Eidelberg; Matthew J During Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-06-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J G Nutt; K J Burchiel; C L Comella; J Jankovic; A E Lang; E R Laws; A M Lozano; R D Penn; R K Simpson; M Stacy; G F Wooten Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-01-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ankit I Mehta; Bryan D Choi; Raghu Raghavan; Martin Brady; Allan H Friedman; Darell D Bigner; Ira Pastan; John H Sampson Journal: Toxins (Basel) Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 4.546
Authors: Scott C Vermilyea; Jianfeng Lu; Miles Olsen; Scott Guthrie; Yunlong Tao; Eva M Fekete; Marissa K Riedel; Kevin Brunner; Carissa Boettcher; Viktorya Bondarenko; Ethan Brodsky; Walter F Block; Andrew Alexander; Su-Chun Zhang; Marina E Emborg Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Martin L Brady; Raghu Raghavan; Jaime Mata; Mike Wilson; Scott Wilson; Rick M Odland; William C Broaddus Journal: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: Ned H Kalin; Andrew S Fox; Rothem Kovner; Marissa K Riedel; Eva M Fekete; Patrick H Roseboom; Do P M Tromp; Benjamin P Grabow; Miles E Olsen; Ethan K Brodsky; Daniel R McFarlin; Andrew L Alexander; Marina E Emborg; Walter F Block; Julie L Fudge; Jonathan A Oler Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2016-01-30 Impact factor: 13.382