Yu-Hsiang Hsieh1, Gabor D Kelen2, Oliver Laeyendecker3, Chadd K Kraus4, Thomas C Quinn3, Richard E Rothman5. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: yhsieh1@jhmi.edu. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 4. Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Division of Infectious Diseases, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The recently released HIV Care Continuum Initiative is a cornerstone of the National AIDS Strategy and a model for improving care for those living with HIV. To our knowledge, there are no studies exploring the entirety of the HIV Care Continuum for patients in the emergency department (ED). We determine gaps in the HIV Care Continuum to identify potential opportunities for improved care for HIV-infected ED patients. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was used in 1 inner-city ED in 2007. Data elements were derived from an identity-unlinked HIV seroprevalence study, an ongoing nontargeted HIV screening program, and a structured survey of known HIV-positive ED patients. RESULTS: Identity-unlinked testing of 3,417 unique ED patients found that 265 (7.8%) were HIV positive. Of patients testing HIV positive, 73% had received a previous diagnosis (based on self-report, chart review, or presence of antiretrovirals in serum), but only 61% were recognized by the clinician as being HIV infected (based on self-report or chart review). Of patients testing positive, 43% were linked to care, 39% were retained in care, 27% were receiving antiretrovirals, 26% were aware of their receiving antiretroviral treatment, 22% were virally suppressed, and only 9% were self-aware of their viral suppression. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this study is the first to quantify gaps in HIV care for an ED patient population, with the HIV Care Continuum as a framework. Our findings identified distinct phases (ie, testing, provider awareness of HIV diagnosis, and linkage to care) in which the greatest opportunities for intervention exist, if appropriate resources were allocated. This schema could serve as a model for other indolent treatable diseases frequently observed in EDs, where continuity of care is critical.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The recently released HIV Care Continuum Initiative is a cornerstone of the National AIDS Strategy and a model for improving care for those living with HIV. To our knowledge, there are no studies exploring the entirety of the HIV Care Continuum for patients in the emergency department (ED). We determine gaps in the HIV Care Continuum to identify potential opportunities for improved care for HIV-infected EDpatients. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was used in 1 inner-city ED in 2007. Data elements were derived from an identity-unlinked HIV seroprevalence study, an ongoing nontargeted HIV screening program, and a structured survey of known HIV-positive ED patients. RESULTS: Identity-unlinked testing of 3,417 unique ED patients found that 265 (7.8%) were HIV positive. Of patients testing HIV positive, 73% had received a previous diagnosis (based on self-report, chart review, or presence of antiretrovirals in serum), but only 61% were recognized by the clinician as being HIV infected (based on self-report or chart review). Of patients testing positive, 43% were linked to care, 39% were retained in care, 27% were receiving antiretrovirals, 26% were aware of their receiving antiretroviral treatment, 22% were virally suppressed, and only 9% were self-aware of their viral suppression. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this study is the first to quantify gaps in HIV care for an ED patient population, with the HIV Care Continuum as a framework. Our findings identified distinct phases (ie, testing, provider awareness of HIV diagnosis, and linkage to care) in which the greatest opportunities for intervention exist, if appropriate resources were allocated. This schema could serve as a model for other indolent treatable diseases frequently observed in EDs, where continuity of care is critical.
Authors: Baruch S Fertel; Kimberly W Hart; Christopher J Lindsell; Richard J Ryan; Michael S Lyons Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: T Rinda Soong; Julianna J Jung; Gabor D Kelen; Richard E Rothman; Avanthi Burah; Judy B Shahan; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Myron S Cohen; Ying Q Chen; Marybeth McCauley; Theresa Gamble; Mina C Hosseinipour; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; James G Hakim; Johnstone Kumwenda; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Jose H S Pilotto; Sheela V Godbole; Sanjay Mehendale; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Breno R Santos; Kenneth H Mayer; Irving F Hoffman; Susan H Eshleman; Estelle Piwowar-Manning; Lei Wang; Joseph Makhema; Lisa A Mills; Guy de Bruyn; Ian Sanne; Joseph Eron; Joel Gallant; Diane Havlir; Susan Swindells; Heather Ribaudo; Vanessa Elharrar; David Burns; Taha E Taha; Karin Nielsen-Saines; David Celentano; Max Essex; Thomas R Fleming Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Melanie A Thompson; Judith A Aberg; Jennifer F Hoy; Amalio Telenti; Constance Benson; Pedro Cahn; Joseph J Eron; Huldrych F Günthard; Scott M Hammer; Peter Reiss; Douglas D Richman; Giuliano Rizzardini; David L Thomas; Donna M Jacobsen; Paul A Volberding Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Richard E Rothman; Oliver B Laeyendecker; Gabor D Kelen; Ama Avornu; Eshan U Patel; Jim Kim; Risha Irvin; David L Thomas; Thomas C Quinn Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-02-21 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jason Zucker; Benjamin Patterson; Tanya Ellman; Jacek Slowikowski; Susan Olender; Peter Gordon; Ellen A B Morrison; Magdalena E Sobieszczyk Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Eshan U Patel; Oliver Laeyendecker; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Richard E Rothman; Gabor D Kelen; Thomas C Quinn Journal: J Clin Virol Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 3.168
Authors: Jessica P Ridgway; Ellen A Almirol; Alvie Bender; Andrew Richardson; Jessica Schmitt; Eleanor Friedman; Nicola Lancki; Ivan Leroux; Nina Pieroni; Jessica Dehlin; John A Schneider Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Lucia V Torian; Uriel R Felsen; Qiang Xia; Fabienne Laraque; Eric J Rude; Herbert Rose; Adam Cole; Angelica Bocour; Gary J Williams; Robert F Bridgforth; Lisa A Forgione; Howard Doo; Sarah L Braunstein; Demetre C Daskalakis; Barry S Zingman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Kaylin J Beck; Richard E Rothman; Megan Gauvey-Kern; Alonzo Woodfield; Stephen Peterson; Danielle Signer; Charlotte A Gaydos Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Gabor D Kelen; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Richard E Rothman; Eshan U Patel; Oliver B Laeyendecker; Mark A Marzinke; William Clarke; Teresa Parsons; Jordyn L Manucci; Thomas C Quinn Journal: AIDS Date: 2016-01-02 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Evan Gerber; Lillian Gelberg; Ethan Cowan; Tod Mijanovich; Donna Shelley; Rajneesh Gulati; Ian Wittman; Kelly M Doran Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-01-01