Literature DB >> 25720704

Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography vs hysteroscopy in benign uterine endocavitary findings.

M Zinna1, M Gentile, F Torcia, P Bianchi, G Cozza, R Marziani, G N Milazzo, A Catalano, M Di Properzio, F Manzara, M Schimberni, D Caserta, A Frega.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography vs hysteroscopy in patients with benign uterine endocavitary findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 202 patients submitted to sonohysterography after transvaginal ultrasound examination suspicious for uterine endocavitary findings. Cytological sample was taken and analyzed from the fluid used to distend the uterine cavity. Of 202 patients enrolled for this study, 86 patients underwent gynaecological surgery, of whom 77 were treated with operative hysteroscopy and 9 with other gynaecological surgical techniques. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate diagnostic agreement between sonohysterography vs hysteroscopy and cytology vs histology.
RESULTS: Diagnostic concordance between sonohysterography and hysteroscopy was significant (k value 0.87). The correlation between cytological and histological findings had a moderate level of concordance (k value 0.49).
CONCLUSIONS: Sonohysterography provides a diagnostic accuracy as well as hysteroscopy, therefore, it could be considered an alternative procedure in the diagnosis of benign uterine endocavitary findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25720704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci        ISSN: 1128-3602            Impact factor:   3.507


  1 in total

1.  Hysteroscopy as an investigation tool in recurrent implantation failure in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Haifa A Al-Turki
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.484

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.