Literature DB >> 25719812

Getting Clearer About Surgical Innovation: A New Definition and a New Tool to Support Responsible Practice.

Katrina Hutchison1, Wendy Rogers, Anthony Eyers, Mianna Lotz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This article presents an original definition of surgical innovation and a practical tool for identifying planned innovations. These will support the responsible introduction of surgical innovations.
BACKGROUND: Frameworks developed for the safer introduction of surgical innovations rely upon identifying cases of innovation; oversight cannot occur unless innovations are identified. However, there is no consensus among surgeons about which interventions they consider innovative; existing definitions are vague and impractical.
METHODS: Using conceptual analysis, this article synthesizes findings from relevant literature, and from qualitative research with surgeons, to develop an original definition of surgical innovation and a tool for prospectively identifying planned surgical innovations. The tool has been developed in light of feedback from health care professionals, surgeons, and policy makers.
RESULTS: This definition of innovation distinguishes between variations, introduction of established interventions, and innovations in surgical techniques or use of devices. It can be applied easily and consistently, is sensitive to the key features of innovation (newness and degree of change), is prospective, and focuses on features relevant to safety and evaluation. The accompanying tool is deliberately broad so that appropriate supports may, if necessary, be provided each time that a surgeon does something "new."
CONCLUSIONS: The definition presented in this article overcomes a number of practical challenges. The definition and tool will be of value in supporting responsible surgical innovation, in particular, through the prospective identification of planned innovations.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25719812     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  13 in total

1.  Macquarie Surgical Innovation Identification Tool (MSIIT): a study protocol for a usability and pilot test.

Authors:  Brette Blakely; Amanda Selwood; Wendy A Rogers; Robyn Clay-Williams
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  Introduction of new techniques and technologies in surgery: Where is transanal total mesorectal excision today?

Authors:  Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Sunil Patel; Shaila Merchant; Carl Brown
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-05-27

3.  Conceptualising Surgical Innovation: An Eliminativist Proposal.

Authors:  Giles Birchley; Jonathan Ives; Richard Huxtable; Jane Blazeby
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2020-03

Review 4.  Ethics in Surgical Innovations from the Patient Perspective.

Authors:  Tony Eyers; Yordanka Krastev
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2020-08-21

Review 5.  Reflection on the enactment and impact of safety laws for regenerative medicine in Japan.

Authors:  Kayo Takashima; Michael Morrison; Jusaku Minari
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 7.765

6.  Current Status and Issues of Ethical Review for Surgical Research in Japanese University Hospitals.

Authors:  Mariko Doi; Keiko Yukawa; Hajime Sato
Journal:  JMA J       Date:  2021-12-21

7.  Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol.

Authors:  Christin Hoffmann; Sina Hossaini; Sian Cousins; Natalie Blencowe; Angus G K McNair; Jane M Blazeby; Kerry N L Avery; Shelley Potter; Rhiannon Macefield
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2021-11-12

8.  Understanding stage of innovation of invasive procedures and devices: protocol for a systematic review and thematic analysis.

Authors:  Darren L Scroggie; Daisy Elliott; Sian Cousins; Kerry Nl Avery; Jane M Blazeby; Natalie S Blencowe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Discussing surgical innovation with patients: a qualitative study of surgeons' and governance representatives' views.

Authors:  Jesmond Zahra; Sangeetha Paramasivan; Natalie S Blencowe; Sian Cousins; Kerry Avery; Johnny Mathews; Barry G Main; Angus G K McNair; Robert Hinchliffe; Jane M Blazeby; Daisy Elliott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  'Overnight, things changed. Suddenly, we were in it': a qualitative study exploring how surgical teams mitigated risks of COVID-19.

Authors:  Daisy Elliott; Cynthia Ochieng; Marcus Jepson; Natalie S Blencowe; Kerry Nl Avery; Sangeetha Paramasivan; Sian Cousins; Anni Skilton; Peter Hutchinson; David Jayne; Martin Birchall; Jane M Blazeby; Jenny L Donovan; Leila Rooshenas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.