Literature DB >> 25719468

Accuracy, precision, usability, and cost of free chlorine residual testing methods.

Anna Murray1, Daniele Lantagne1.   

Abstract

Chlorine is the most widely used disinfectant worldwide, partially because residual protection is maintained after treatment. This residual is measured using colorimetric test kits varying in accuracy, precision, training required, and cost. Seven commercially available colorimeters, color wheel and test tube comparator kits, pool test kits, and test strips were evaluated for use in low-resource settings by: (1) measuring in quintuplicate 11 samples from 0.0-4.0 mg/L free chlorine residual in laboratory and natural light settings to determine accuracy and precision; (2) conducting volunteer testing where participants used and evaluated each test kit; and (3) comparing costs. Laboratory accuracy ranged from 5.1-40.5% measurement error, with colorimeters the most accurate and test strip methods the least. Variation between laboratory and natural light readings occurred with one test strip method. Volunteer participants found test strip methods easiest and color wheel methods most difficult, and were most confident in the colorimeter and least confident in test strip methods. Costs range from 3.50-444 USD for 100 tests. Application of a decision matrix found colorimeters and test tube comparator kits were most appropriate for use in low-resource settings; it is recommended users apply the decision matrix themselves, as the appropriate kit might vary by context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25719468     DOI: 10.2166/wh.2014.195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Water Health        ISSN: 1477-8920            Impact factor:   1.744


  7 in total

1.  An Automated Toolchain for Camera-Enabled Sensing of Drinking Water Chlorine Residual.

Authors:  Alyssa Schubert; Leah Pifer; Jianzhong Cheng; Shawn P McElmurry; Branko Kerkez; Nancy G Love
Journal:  ACS ES T Eng       Date:  2022-06-03

2.  Stability of Free Available Chlorine Levels in Dilute Sodium Hypochlorite Solutions over a 6-Week Period.

Authors:  Christopher K Gow; Caren Weinhouse; Graham O'Brien Johnson; Kim E Saunders
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 1.706

3.  Differences in field effectiveness and adoption between a novel automated chlorination system and household manual chlorination of drinking water in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Amy J Pickering; Yoshika Crider; Nuhu Amin; Valerie Bauza; Leanne Unicomb; Jennifer Davis; Stephen P Luby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Accuracy, Precision, Ease-Of-Use, and Cost of Methods to Test Ebola-Relevant Chlorine Solutions.

Authors:  Emma Wells; Marlene K Wolfe; Anna Murray; Daniele Lantagne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Potentiometric Sensor Based on Carbon Paste Electrode for Monitoring Total Residual Chlorine in Electrolytically-Treated Ballast Water.

Authors:  Yaning Zhang; Zhihui Li; Xiaotong Guo; Guangzhou Liu; Shuyong Zhang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  The effectiveness of water treatment processes against schistosome cercariae: A systematic review.

Authors:  Laura Braun; Jack E T Grimes; Michael R Templeton
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-04-02

7.  Analysis of free chlorine in aqueous solution at very low concentration with lateral flow tests.

Authors:  K Uta Schwenke; Dieter Spiehl; Marcel Krauße; Laura Riedler; Anna Ruppenthal; Klaus Villforth; Tobias Meckel; Markus Biesalski; Daniel Rupprecht; Gerhard Schwall
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.