Literature DB >> 25717085

Comparative study of DL-selenomethionine vs sodium selenite and seleno-yeast on antioxidant activity and selenium status in laying hens.

C L Jing1, X F Dong1, Z M Wang1, S Liu1, J M Tong2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of DL-selenomethionine (SM) with 2 routinely used Se sources, sodium selenite (SS) and seleno-yeast (SY), on relative bioavailability based on antioxidant activity and tissue Se content. Six hundred thirty 131-day-old brown laying hens were randomly assigned to 7 treatments for 168 d (24 wks) with 6 replicates of 15 hens per replicate. The SS and SY animals were supplemented a cornmeal and soybean diet that supplied a total Se 0.3 mg/kg whereas SM was added at 4 different levels to the total Se at 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 mg/kg. All hens fed the Se-supplemented diet showed higher glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity (P < 0.01), higher superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (P < 0.05), lower malondialdehyde (MDA) content (P < 0.05) in plasma, and greater Se contents in egg yolks, albumen, leg muscle, breast muscle, liver, and plasma compared with those fed the control diet (P < 0.01). The organic sources (SY and SM) exhibited a greater ability to increase the GSH-Px activity (P < 0.01) and Se content in albumen (P < 0.01), leg, and breast muscles (P = 0.0099 and P = 0.0014, respectively) than the SS that was added at 0.3 mg Se/kg. The higher SM added levels increased the GSH-Px activity until the dose of 0.5mg Se/kg (P < 0.01).The greater Se concentrations in albumen, muscle and liver appeared in the higher SM-added level, as well as above the dose of 0.1 mg Se/kg (P < 0.01). In addition, hens fed the diet with SM accumulated more Se in albumen, leg, and breast muscle than those fed diets with SY (P < 0.05). These results confirmed the higher ability of organic Se sources to increase the antioxidant activity and Se deposition in egg albumen, leg, and breast muscles compared with SS, and demonstrated a significantly better efficiency of SM compared with SY for albumen and muscle Se enrichment.
© 2015 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antioxidant; laying hen; selenium; selenium deposition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25717085     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  13 in total

1.  Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BLCC1-0238 Can Effectively Improve Laying Performance and Egg Quality Via Enhancing Immunity and Regulating Reproductive Hormones of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Yufa Zhou; Song Li; Quanhai Pang; Zengmin Miao
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Alterations in transcriptome and antioxidant activity of naturally aged mice exposed to selenium-rich rice.

Authors:  Rui Zeng; Yuanke Liang; Muhammad Umer Farooq; Yujie Zhang; Hla Hla Ei; Zhichen Tang; Tengda Zheng; Yang Su; Xiaoying Ye; Xiaomei Jia; Jianqing Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Effects of bacterial organic selenium, selenium yeast and sodium selenite on antioxidant enzymes activity, serum biochemical parameters, and selenium concentration in Lohman brown-classic hens.

Authors:  A I Muhammad; A M Dalia; T C Loh; H Akit; Anjas A Samsudin
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Comparing the Influences of Selenium Nanospheres, Sodium Selenite, and Biological Selenium on the Growth Performance, Blood Biochemistry, and Antioxidative Capacity of Growing Turkey Pullets.

Authors:  Samya E Ibrahim; Mohammed H Alzawqari; Yahya Z Eid; Mohsen Zommara; Aziza M Hassan; Mahmoud A O Dawood
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-08-22       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Effects of Nano-Selenium on Antioxidant Capacity in Se-Deprived Tibetan Gazelle (Procapra picticaudata) in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Shen; Bin Huo; Shangquan Gan
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Effects of selenium feed supplements on functional properties of eggs.

Authors:  Gabriela Borilova; Miroslava Fasiangova; Danka Harustiakova; Dana Kumprechtova; Josef Illek; Eric Auclair; Ruth Raspoet
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.701

7.  Dietary Selenized Glucose Increases Selenium Concentration and Antioxidant Capacity of the Liver, Oviduct, and Spleen in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Minmeng Zhao; Qingyun Sun; Mawahib Khedir Khogali; Long Liu; Tuoyu Geng; Lei Yu; Daoqing Gong
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  A 2018 European Thyroid Association Survey on the Use of Selenium Supplementation in Graves' Hyperthyroidism and Graves' Orbitopathy.

Authors:  Roberto Negro; Laszlo Hegedüs; Roberto Attanasio; Enrico Papini; Kristian H Winther
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2018-12-13

9.  Effect of Glycine Nano-Selenium Supplementation on Production Performance, Egg Quality, Serum Biochemistry, Oxidative Status, and the Intestinal Morphology and Absorption of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Wenting Zhou; Sasa Miao; Mingkun Zhu; Xinyang Dong; Xiaoting Zou
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Safety Assessment and Comparison of Sodium Selenite and Bioselenium Obtained from Yeast in Mice.

Authors:  Xinghua Wang; Yukun Yang; Hening Zhang; Ju Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.