| Literature DB >> 25716878 |
Gerald S Pullman1, Xiaoyan Zeng2, Brandi Copeland-Kamp2, Jonathan Crockett2, Jacob Lucrezi3, Sheldon W May3, Kylie Bucalo2.
Abstract
A major barrier to the commercialization of somatic embryogenesis technology in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) is recalcitrance of some high-value crosses to initiate embryogenic tissue (ET) and continue early-stage somatic embryo growth. Developing initiation and multiplication media that resemble the seed environment has been shown to decrease this recalcitrance. Glutathione (GSH), glutathione disulfide (GSSG), ascorbic acid and dehydroascorbate analyses were performed weekly throughout the sequence of seed development for female gametophyte and zygotic embryo tissues to determine physiological concentrations. Major differences in stage-specific oxidation-reduction (redox) agents were observed. A simple bioassay was used to evaluate potential growth-promotion of natural and inorganic redox agents added to early-stage somatic embryo growth medium. Compounds showing statistically significant increases in early-stage embryo growth were then tested for the ability to increase initiation of loblolly pine. Low-cost reducing agents sodium dithionite and sodium thiosulfate increased ET initiation for loblolly pine and Douglas fir (Mirb) Franco. Germination medium supplementation with GSSG increased somatic embryo germination. Early-stage somatic embryos grown on medium with or without sodium thiosulfate did not differ in GSH or GSSG content, suggesting that sodium thiosulfate-mediated growth stimulation does not involve GSH or GSSG. We have developed information demonstrating that alteration of the redox environment in vitro can improve ET initiation, early-stage embryo development and somatic embryo germination in loblolly pine.Entities:
Keywords: Douglas fir; Pinus taeda; Pseudotsuga menziesii; ascorbic acid; embryo development; female gametophyte; glutathione; glutathione disulfide; loblolly pine; redox agents; sodium dithionite; sodium thiosulfate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25716878 DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpu117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tree Physiol ISSN: 0829-318X Impact factor: 4.196