Literature DB >> 25716659

Associations among pain, disability and psychosocial factors and the predictive value of expectations on returning to work in patients who undergo lumbar disc surgery.

Ann-Christin Johansson1, John Öhrvik2, Anne Söderlund3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the associations among pain, disability and psychosocial factors preoperatively as well as 3 and 24 months later for patients who undergo first time discectomy and to analyse the predictive value of psychosocial factors on the outcome 24 months after surgery.
METHODS: Fifty-nine patients, 41 % women, with a mean age of 40 years and without comorbidities were included, of whom 56 responded to the 24-month follow-up; at that point, they were divided into patients with complaints (C, n = 36) and patients without complaints (NC, n = 20). Correlations among the pain intensity, disability and psychosocial factors were analysed preoperatively, 3 and 24 months after discectomy, and regression analyses of psychosocial factors on the outcome at 24 months were performed.
RESULTS: Psychosocial variables were weakly correlated with the pain intensity and disability preoperatively. High expectations on the return to work were predictive of both pain intensity (β = 8.0, p = 0.03) and disability (β = 9.1, p < 0.001) at 24 months. Associations between psychosocial variables and outcome variables were strengthened at the 3-month follow-up in the C group, and this association remained 24 months after surgery. Fear of movement was most strongly correlated with leg pain intensity (r (s) 0.64, p < 0.001) and the ability to decrease pain was the most correlated with disability (r (s) 0.78, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Having high expectations on the return to work after surgery was the strongest predictor for a favourable outcome. Therefore, low preoperative expectations on return to work convey an important prognostic signal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coping strategies; Lumbar discectomy; Pain disability; Patients’ expectations; Psychosocial factors

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25716659     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3820-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

Review 1.  Work-related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biopsychosocial predictors of prognosis in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature (corrected and republished) *.

Authors:  François Laisné; Conrad Lecomte; Marc Corbière
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Continued disability and pain after lumbar disc surgery: the role of cognitive-behavioral factors.

Authors:  Jasper J den Boer; Rob A B Oostendorp; Tjemme Beems; Marten Munneke; Andrea W M Evers
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Predictors of multidimensional outcome after spinal surgery.

Authors:  A F Mannion; A Elfering; R Staerkle; A Junge; D Grob; J Dvorak; N Jacobshagen; N K Semmer; N Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Patients' experience of health three years after structured physiotherapy or surgery for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Gunilla Limbäck Svensson; Gunilla Kjellby Wendt; Roland Thomeé; Ella Danielson
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Richard A Deyo; Tor D Tosteson; James N Weinstein; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Catastrophizing, pain, and disability in patients with soft-tissue injuries.

Authors:  Michael J L Sullivan; William Stanish; Heather Waite; Maureen Sullivan; Dean A Tripp
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment.

Authors:  Anne K Rosenstiel; Francis J Keefe
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Pain coping strategies in a Dutch population of chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Philip Spinhoven; Moniek M Ter Kuile; Corry G A Linssen; Bert Gazendam
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 10.  The Swedish Spine Register: development, design and utility.

Authors:  Björn Strömqvist; Peter Fritzell; Olle Hägg; Bo Jönsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Exploring the expectation-actuality discrepancy: a systematic review of the impact of preoperative expectations on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Christopher D Witiw; Alireza Mansouri; Francois Mathieu; Farshad Nassiri; Jetan H Badhiwala; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Multidimensional long-term outcome analysis after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy: a retrospective single-centre study.

Authors:  Sebastian A Ahmadi; Ilja-Paul Burkert; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Sven Oliver Eicker
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-03

Review 3.  Can pain catastrophizing be changed in surgical patients? A scoping review

Authors:  Eric Gibson; Marlis T. Sabo
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Can patient-reported profiles avoid unnecessary referral to a spine surgeon? An observational study to further develop the Nijmegen Decision Tool for Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Johanna M van Dongen; Veerle M Coupé; Maarten Spruit; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.