Allison M Baker1, Katherine C Smith2, Kisha I Coa2, Kathy J Helzlsouer3, Laura E Caulfield2, Kimberly S Peairs4, Lillie D Shockney4, Ann C Klassen5. 1. Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA ack57@drexel.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine clinical care providers' perspectives on cancer survivors' body size and weight management. STUDY DESIGN: In-depth, semi-structured, qualitative interviews. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 33 providers (eg. oncologists, surgeons, primary care providers, nurses, dietitians) across academic and community clinical settings. They were transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically using constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: Providers conceptualized weight in relation to acute treatment, cancer outcomes, or overall health/comorbidities. These patterns were reflected in their reported framing of weight discussions, although providers indicated that they counsel patients on weight to varying extents. Perspectives differed based on professional roles and patient populations. Providers reported that survivors are motivated to lose weight, particularly due to comorbidity concerns, but face numerous barriers to doing so. CONCLUSION: Providers described survivor-level and capacity-level factors influencing survivors' weight management. Differences by provider type highlighted the role of provider knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs in clinical encounters. Opportunities for research and intervention include developing and disseminating evidence-based clinical resources for weight management among cancer survivors, addressing capacity barriers, and exploring communication strategies at interpersonal and population levels.
OBJECTIVE: To examine clinical care providers' perspectives on cancer survivors' body size and weight management. STUDY DESIGN: In-depth, semi-structured, qualitative interviews. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 33 providers (eg. oncologists, surgeons, primary care providers, nurses, dietitians) across academic and community clinical settings. They were transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically using constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: Providers conceptualized weight in relation to acute treatment, cancer outcomes, or overall health/comorbidities. These patterns were reflected in their reported framing of weight discussions, although providers indicated that they counsel patients on weight to varying extents. Perspectives differed based on professional roles and patient populations. Providers reported that survivors are motivated to lose weight, particularly due to comorbidity concerns, but face numerous barriers to doing so. CONCLUSION: Providers described survivor-level and capacity-level factors influencing survivors' weight management. Differences by provider type highlighted the role of provider knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs in clinical encounters. Opportunities for research and intervention include developing and disseminating evidence-based clinical resources for weight management among cancer survivors, addressing capacity barriers, and exploring communication strategies at interpersonal and population levels.
Authors: Cheryl L Rock; Colleen Doyle; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Kerry S Courneya; Anna L Schwartz; Elisa V Bandera; Kathryn K Hamilton; Barbara Grant; Marji McCullough; Tim Byers; Ted Gansler Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Elizabeth A Platz; Jennifer A Ligibel; Cindy K Blair; Kerry S Courneya; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Patricia A Ganz; Cheryl L Rock; Kathryn H Schmitz; Thomas Wadden; Errol J Philip; Bruce Wolfe; Susan M Gapstur; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Anne McTiernan; Lori Minasian; Linda Nebeling; Pamela J Goodwin Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Krista Casazza; Kevin R Fontaine; Arne Astrup; Leann L Birch; Andrew W Brown; Michelle M Bohan Brown; Nefertiti Durant; Gareth Dutton; E Michael Foster; Steven B Heymsfield; Kerry McIver; Tapan Mehta; Nir Menachemi; P K Newby; Russell Pate; Barbara J Rolls; Bisakha Sen; Daniel L Smith; Diana M Thomas; David B Allison Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Suzanne C O'Neill; Jessica T DeFrank; Patti Vegella; Alice R Richman; Leonard R Henry; Lisa A Carey; Noel T Brewer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tammy K Stump; June K Robinson; Betina Yanez; Frank Penedo; Adaeze Ezeofor; Sheetal Kircher; Bonnie Spring Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Nataliya V Ivankova; Laura Q Rogers; Ivan I Herbey; Michelle Y Martin; Maria Pisu; Dorothy Pekmezi; Lieu Thompson; Yu-Mei M Schoenberger-Godwin; Robert A Oster; Kevin Fontaine; Jami L Anderson; Kelly Kenzik; David Farrell; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2021-10-06
Authors: Ria Joseph; Nicolas H Hart; Natalie Bradford; Oluwaseyifunmi Andi Agbejule; Bogda Koczwara; Alexandre Chan; Matthew P Wallen; Raymond J Chan Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Kathryn H Schmitz; Catherine M Alfano; Jennifer R Bail; Pamela J Goodwin; Cynthia A Thomson; Don W Bradley; Kerry S Courneya; Christie A Befort; Crystal S Denlinger; Jennifer A Ligibel; William H Dietz; Melinda R Stolley; Melinda L Irwin; Marcas M Bamman; Caroline M Apovian; Bernardine M Pinto; Kathleen Y Wolin; Rachel M Ballard; Andrew J Dannenberg; Elizabeth G Eakin; Matt M Longjohn; Susan D Raffa; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Joanne S Buzaglo; Sharyl J Nass; Greta M Massetti; Erin P Balogh; Elizabeth S Kraft; Anand K Parekh; Darshak M Sanghavi; G Stephen Morris; Karen Basen-Engquist Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Ann Carroll Klassen; Katherine Clegg Smith; Michelle Shuster; Kisha I Coa; Laura E Caulfield; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Kimberly S Peairs; Lillie D Shockney; Dara Stoney; Susan Hannum Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 3.279