Literature DB >> 25715351

Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of pediatric sellar defects: a radiographic feasibility study and case series.

Patricia L Purcell1, Justin R Shinn2, Randolph K Otto3, Greg E Davis2, Sanjay R Parikh4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we used computed tomography measurements to investigate the feasibility of nasoseptal flap reconstruction of sellar defects in children, and we reviewed our institutional experience with the procedure. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional and case series.
SETTING: Pediatric tertiary care facility.
METHODS: We obtained 10 normal maxillofacial scans for each year of age from birth to 18. Computer-assisted nasal and skull-base measurements were performed. Patients with incomplete pneumatization were excluded from analysis. Reconstruction was presumed feasible if the ratio of nasoseptal flap length to associated sellar defect length was greater than 1. Chart review identified surgical patients.
RESULTS: Of 190 scans, 125 had complete pneumatization. Of these, 120 (96%) displayed a ratio of nasoseptal flap length to sellar defect length greater than 1, suggesting that reconstruction would be feasible. Mean ratio of flap length to defect length for all subjects was 1.47 (SD 0.33; 95% CI, 1.41-1.53). Only 5 of 125 patients (4%) had a ratio less than 1; the median age for these patients was 15 years, which is older than the median age of 12 years for subjects with a ratio greater than 1 (P = .02). An inverse relationship was identified between age and ratio of flap length to defect length (r = -0.49, P < .001). Case series identified 6 children, ages 5 to 17; flap length was never described as a limitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Nasoseptal flap length is not a limiting factor for reconstruction of pediatric sellar defects. When compared with older patients, younger patients tend to have greater nasoseptal flap length relative to sellar defect length. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography; endoscopic surgical procedure; nasoseptal flap; pediatric surgery; skull base surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25715351     DOI: 10.1177/0194599815571284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  5 in total

Review 1.  Skull Base Reconstruction in the Pediatric Patient.

Authors:  Irit Duek; Alon Pener-Tessler; Ravit Yanko-Arzi; Arik Zaretski; Avraham Abergel; Ahmad Safadi; Dan M Fliss
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-01-05

2.  Endonasal endoscopic skullbase surgery in children.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar E Deopujari; Nishit J Shah; Salman T Shaikh; Vikram S Karmarkar; Chandan B Mohanty
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Pediatric Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches for Skull Base Lesions in the Very Young: Is It Safe and Effective?

Authors:  Javan Nation; Alexander J Schupper; Adam Deconde; Michael Levy
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-04-30

Review 4.  Pediatric sinonasal and skull base lesions.

Authors:  Charles A Riley; Christian P Soneru; Jonathan B Overdevest; Marc L Otten; David A Gudis
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-08

Review 5.  The expanded endonasal approach in pediatric skull base surgery: A review.

Authors:  Nyall R London; Gustavo G Rangel; Patrick C Walz
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.