Literature DB >> 25715349

State of otolaryngology match: has competition increased since the "early" match?

Cristina Cabrera-Muffly1, Jeanelle Sheeder2, Mona Abaza3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine fluctuations in supply and demand of otolaryngology residency positions after the shift from an "early match" coordinated by the San Francisco match to a "conventional" matching process through the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP). To determine whether competition among otolaryngology residency positions have changed during this time frame.
DESIGN: Database analysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Matching statistics from 1998 to 2013 were obtained for all first-year residency positions through the NRMP. Matching statistics from 1998 to 2005 were obtained for otolaryngology residency positions through the San Francisco match. Univariate analysis was performed, with a P value less than .05 determined as significant.
RESULTS: The number of otolaryngology positions and applicants remained proportional to the overall number of positions and applicants in the NRMP match. Otolaryngology applicants per position and the matching rate of all applicants did not change between the 2 time periods studied. The overall match rate of US seniors applying to otolaryngology did not change, while the match rate of non-US seniors decreased significantly following initiation of the conventional match. There was no significant change in United States Medical Licensing Exam step 1 scores or percentage of unfilled otolaryngology residency positions between the 2 time periods.
CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the early versus conventional otolaryngology match time periods, the only major change was the decreased percentage of matching among non-US senior applicants. Despite a significant shift in match timing after 2006, the supply, demand, and competitiveness of otolaryngology residency positions have not changed significantly. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.

Keywords:  education; match; residency

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25715349     DOI: 10.1177/0194599815571318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  7 in total

1.  Association of Otolaryngology Resident Duty Hour Restrictions With Procedure-Specific Outcomes in Head and Neck Endocrine Surgery.

Authors:  Aaron Smith; Lauren Braden; Jim Wan; Merry Sebelik
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  I dream of Gini: Quantifying inequality in otolaryngology residency interviews.

Authors:  Andrew H Lee; Patrick Young; Ross Liao; Paul H Yi; Douglas Reh; Simon R Best
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Applicant characteristics associated with successful matching into otolaryngology.

Authors:  Leah J Hauser; Grant M Gebhard; Rachel Blumhagen; Nichole E Carlson; Cristina Cabrera-Muffly
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database.

Authors:  Nicholas R Lenze; Angela P Mihalic; Christine E DeMason; Rupali N Shah; Robert A Buckmire; Brian D Thorp; Charles S Ebert; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-10

5.  Practice Patterns and Career Satisfaction in Recent Head and Neck Oncology Fellowship Graduates.

Authors:  Scott A Hong; Jonathan A Bergman; Ronald J Walker; Sean T Massa
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2022-08-21

6.  Geographic Trends in the Otolaryngology Match (2016-2020).

Authors:  Jeffrey D Bernstein; Shane Shahrestani; Bita Shahrvini; Deborah Watson
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-06-16

Review 7.  Strategies to Encourage Medical Student Interest in Urology.

Authors:  Jubin E Matloubieh; Manizheh Eghbali; Nitya Abraham
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.092

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.