Literature DB >> 25715238

Selection of patients for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) versus subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT).

Farnaz Tabatabaian1, Thomas B Casale.   

Abstract

Allergy immunotherapy has been used to help alleviate symptoms of allergic diseases for over 100 years. In the setting of the recently approved sublingual immunotherapy, allergists are now faced with which therapeutic regimen to use in clinical practice, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) or subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Both SLIT and SCIT have been shown to be beneficial for the therapy of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Each therapeutic measure has its associated benefits. SLIT has a better safety profile with less systemic reactions and to date, no reported fatal reactions. SCIT, the primary method of allergen immunotherapy in the United States, has a slightly better efficacy profile and readily allows for treatment of polyallergic patients. This review focuses on how to incorporate SLIT into daily clinical practice and on how to choose SLIT versus SCIT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25715238     DOI: 10.2500/aap.2015.36.3830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc        ISSN: 1088-5412            Impact factor:   2.587


  3 in total

1.  Wheels within wheals: the burden of urticaria and angioedema.

Authors:  Joseph A Bellanti; Russell A Settipane
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.587

2.  Relievers, controllers, and inhaler technique: A physician-patient challenge.

Authors:  Joseph A Bellanti; Russell A Settipane
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.587

Review 3.  Allergic conjunctivitis in Asia.

Authors:  Bernard Yu-Hor Thong
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2017-04-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.