OBJECTIVES: Intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD) contributes to significant morbidity in pediatric patients with intestinal failure (IF); however, the use of parenteral nutrition (PN) with a fish oil-based intravenous (IV) emulsion (FO) has been associated with biochemical reversal of cholestasis and improved outcomes. Unfortunately, FO increases the complexity of care: because it can be administered only under Food and Drug Administration compassionate use protocols requiring special monitoring, it is not available as a 3-in-1 solution and is more expensive than comparable soy-based IV lipid emulsion (SO). Because of these pragmatic constraints, a series of patient families were switched to low-dose (1 g kg(-1) day(-1)) SO following biochemical resolution of cholestasis. The present study examines whether reversal of cholestasis and somatic growth are maintained following this transition. METHODS: The present study is a chart review of all children with IFALD who switched from FO to SO following resolution of cholestasis. Variables are presented as medians (interquartile ranges). Comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Seven patients ages 25.9 (16.2-43.2) months were transitioned to SO following reversal of cholestasis using FO. At a median follow-up of 13.9 (4.3-50.1) months, there were no significant differences between pretransition and post-transition serum alanine and aspartate aminotransferases, direct bilirubin, and weight-for-age z scores. Because of recurrence of cholestasis, 1 patient was restarted on FO after 4 months on SO. CONCLUSIONS: Biochemical reversal of IFALD and growth were preserved after transition from FO to SO in 6 of 7 (86%) patients. Given the challenges associated with the use of FO, SO may be a viable alternative in select patients with home PN.
OBJECTIVES:Intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD) contributes to significant morbidity in pediatric patients with intestinal failure (IF); however, the use of parenteral nutrition (PN) with a fish oil-based intravenous (IV) emulsion (FO) has been associated with biochemical reversal of cholestasis and improved outcomes. Unfortunately, FO increases the complexity of care: because it can be administered only under Food and Drug Administration compassionate use protocols requiring special monitoring, it is not available as a 3-in-1 solution and is more expensive than comparable soy-based IV lipid emulsion (SO). Because of these pragmatic constraints, a series of patient families were switched to low-dose (1 g kg(-1) day(-1)) SO following biochemical resolution of cholestasis. The present study examines whether reversal of cholestasis and somatic growth are maintained following this transition. METHODS: The present study is a chart review of all children with IFALD who switched from FO to SO following resolution of cholestasis. Variables are presented as medians (interquartile ranges). Comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Seven patients ages 25.9 (16.2-43.2) months were transitioned to SO following reversal of cholestasis using FO. At a median follow-up of 13.9 (4.3-50.1) months, there were no significant differences between pretransition and post-transition serum alanine and aspartate aminotransferases, direct bilirubin, and weight-for-age z scores. Because of recurrence of cholestasis, 1 patient was restarted on FO after 4 months on SO. CONCLUSIONS: Biochemical reversal of IFALD and growth were preserved after transition from FO to SO in 6 of 7 (86%) patients. Given the challenges associated with the use of FO, SO may be a viable alternative in select patients with home PN.
Authors: Mark Puder; Clarissa Valim; Jonathan A Meisel; Hau D Le; Vincent E de Meijer; Elizabeth M Robinson; Jing Zhou; Christopher Duggan; Kathleen M Gura Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Deepika Nehra; Erica M Fallon; Sarah J Carlson; Alexis K Potemkin; Nathanael D Hevelone; Paul D Mitchell; Kathleen M Gura; Mark Puder Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Kara L Calkins; James C Y Dunn; Stephen B Shew; Laurie Reyen; Douglas G Farmer; Sherin U Devaskar; Robert S Venick Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Karim C El Kasmi; Aimee L Anderson; Michael W Devereaux; Padade M Vue; Wujuan Zhang; Kenneth D R Setchell; Saul J Karpen; Ronald J Sokol Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Juan J Díaz; Kathleen M Gura; Juliamna Roda; Antonio R Perez-Atayde; Christopher Duggan; Tom Jaksic; Clifford W Lo Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Vincent E de Meijer; Hau D Le; Jonathan A Meisel; Kathleen M Gura; Mark Puder Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Mark E Samuels; Jacek Majewski; Najmeh Alirezaie; Isabel Fernandez; Ferran Casals; Natalie Patey; Hélène Decaluwe; Isabelle Gosselin; Elie Haddad; Alan Hodgkinson; Youssef Idaghdour; Valerie Marchand; Jacques L Michaud; Marc-André Rodrigue; Sylvie Desjardins; Stéphane Dubois; Francoise Le Deist; Philip Awadalla; Vincent Raymond; Bruno Maranda Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Caroline Wang; Robert S Venick; Stephen B Shew; James C Y Dunn; Laurie Reyen; Rong Gou; Kara L Calkins Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Mikołaj Danko; Aleksandra Żyła-Pawlak; Janusz Książyk; Katarzyna Olszewska-Durkacz; Marta Sibilska; Joanna Żydak; Katarzyna Popińska Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 5.717