| Literature DB >> 25714356 |
Savannah Michaelsen1, Jacob Schaefer2, Mark S Peterson3.
Abstract
Assessing the impacts of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill with a dependable baseline comparison can provide reliable insight into environmental stressors on organisms that were potentially affected by the spill. Fluctuating asymmetry (small, non-random deviations from perfect bilateral symmetry) is an informative metric sensitive to contaminants that can be used to assess environmental stress levels. For this study, the well-studied and common Gulf of Mexico estuarine fish, Menidia beryllina, was used with pre and post-oil spill collections. Comparisons of fluctuating asymmetry in three traits (eye diameter, pectoral fin length, and pelvic fin length) were made pre and post-oil spill across two sites (Old Fort Bayou and the Pascagoula River), as well as between years of collection (2011, 2012)--one and two years, respectfully, after the spill in 2010. We hypothesized that fluctuating asymmetry would be higher in post-Deepwater Horizon samples, and that this will be replicated in both study areas along the Mississippi Gulf coast. We also predicted that fluctuating asymmetry would decrease through time after the oil spill as the oil decomposed and/or was removed. Analyses performed on 1135 fish (220 pre and 915 post Deepwater Horizon) showed significantly higher post spill fluctuating asymmetry in the eye but no difference for the pectoral or pelvic fins. There was also higher fluctuating asymmetry in one of the two sites both pre and post-spill, indicating observed asymmetry may be the product of multiple stressors. Fluctuating asymmetry decreased in 2012 compared to 2011. Fluctuating asymmetry is a sensitive measure of sub lethal stress, and the observed variability in this study (pre vs. post-spill or between sites) could be due to a combination of oil, dispersants, or other unknown stressors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25714356 PMCID: PMC4340943 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118742
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Map of the study are with the seven sites shown.
Numbers indicate the total sample size (pre/post DWH) for Old Fort Bayou (OFB) and Pascagoula (PAS).
Descriptive statistics of FA for each of the three measured traits.
| Trait | FA | ME | ICC (%) | DA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.043 | 0.00287 | 93.7 | t = −0.214, P = 0.831 |
|
| 0.111 | 0.00692 | 94.1 | t = 0.125, P = 0.900 |
|
| 0.060 | 0.00529 | 91.9 | t = −0.171, P = 0.865 |
FA and ME (measurement error, see text for details) were calculated from linear mixed model analysis. ICC (interclass correlation coefficient [FA/(FA+ME)]) is an estimate of the repeatability of FA measures. DA are tests for directional asymmetry (null of mean signed FA = 0).
Mixed model ANOVA results comparing FA pre/post DWH and by location with site as a random effect.
| Trait | MS | F | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 5.07 | 20.49 | <0.001 |
|
| 0.70 | 2.84 | 0.029 | |
|
| 0.08 | 0.34 | 0.667 | |
|
|
| 0.26 | 4.22 | 0.142 |
|
| 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.558 | |
|
| 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.982 | |
|
|
| 0.20 | 1.33 | 0.163 |
|
| 0.18 | 1.18 | 0.135 | |
|
| 0.21 | 1.40 | 0.308 |
Significance of F values assessed by maximum likelihood ratio test of nested models (see text for details).
* = significantly different (P<0.05).
Fig 2Mean unsigned FA (95% confidence intervals) for each trait in pre (open symbols) and post (closed symbols) DWH samples by location.
Mixed model ANOVA results comparing FA in 2011 and 2012 samples.
| Trait | MS | F | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 2.04 | 7.57 | 0.007 |
|
|
| 0.45 | 6.76 | 0.010 |
|
|
| 1.01 | 6.04 | 0.016 |
Significance of F values assessed by maximum likelihood ratio test of nested models (see text for details).
* = significantly different (P<0.05).
Fig 3Mean unsigned FA (95% confidence intervals) for each trait by year in post DWH samples, pooling location.