Literature DB >> 25714030

Comparison of the selective targeting efficacy of Salmonella typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009 on the Lewis lung carcinoma in nude mice.

Yong Zhang1, Nan Zhang1, Ming Zhao1, Robert M Hoffman1,2.   

Abstract

Salmonella typhimurium A1-R is auxotrophic for arg and leu, which attenuates growth in normal tissue but allows high tumor targeting and virulence. A1-R is effective against metastatic human prostate, breast, and pancreatic cancer as well as osteosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, and glioma in clinically-relevant mouse models. VNP20009 is also a genetically-modified strain of Salmonella typhimurium that has been tested in Phase I clinical trials, but is more attenuated than S. typhimurium A1-R and in addition of multiple amino-acid auxotrophs, is purine auxotropic with the purI mutation. In the present study, mouse Lewis lung carcinoma-bearing nude mouse models were treated with S. typhimurium A1-R or VNP20009. S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009 were both eliminated from the liver and spleen approximately 3-5 days after administration via the tail vein. However, A1-R showed higher tumor targeting and inhibited the Lewis lung carcinoma to a greater extent than VNP20009, with less body weight loss. The mice tolerated S. typhimurium A1-R to at a least 2-fold higher dose than VNP20009 when the bacteria were administered iv. The results of the present study suggest that S. typhimurium A1-R has greater clinical potential than VNP20009.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GFP; RFP; Salmonella typhimurium A1-R; VNP20009; lung cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25714030      PMCID: PMC4546492          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

For more than 200 years, cancers have been observed to regress following acute infections, mostly streptococcal [1]. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Coley infected cancer patients with Streptococcus pyrogenes and later treated the patients with extracts of the bacteria, which became known as Coley's toxins. Coley had remarkable results with both the bacteria and the toxins [2]. However bacterial therapy of cancer stopped after Coley's death in 1936 [2]. Recently, there has been intense renewed interest to develop bacterial therapy of cancer [2-4]. The barriers in tumors for standard therapy such as hypoxia, acidic pH, disorganized vascular architecture, are beneficial for bacteria to target cancer [3]. One approach to bacterial therapy of cancer is to use anaerobic bacteria such as Bifidobacterium [5] and Clostridium [6] which replicate in necrotic areas of tumors. These anaerobic bacteria cannot grow in viable tumor tissue, which restricts their efficacy. In addition, obligate anaerobic bacteria may be limited to intratumor injection which would preclude their use for metastatic cancer. Recently a human patient with metastatic leiomyosarcoma was treated by intratumoral injection of Clostridium novyi (C. novyi)-NT spores which reduced the tumor within and surrounding the bone [7]. However other tumor deposits in the patient were not affected. S. typhimurium is a facultative anaerobe and therefore unlike anaerobe bacteria can infect viable portions of tumors as well as necrotic areas. The VNP20009 strain of S. typhimurium, attenuated with purine and other auxotrophic mutations, has been previously used for cancer therapy [8]. When NP20009 were inoculated i.p. into C57B6 mice bearing the B16F10 melanoma, it suppressed tumor growth and prolonged average survival to as much as twice that of untreated mice [9]. VNP20009 is attenuated with a lipid A–mutation (msbB), purine auxotrophy (purI) and amino acid auxotrophs [8]. In a Phase I clinical trial on patients with metastatic melanoma and renal-cell carcinoma, VNP20009 was safely administered, but poorly colonized the patients' tumors, perhaps because it was overattenuated [10]. At the highest tolerated dose, some tumor colonization was observed [10]. Another strain of S. typhimurium, A1-R, has been developed by our laboratory, which has greatly increased antitumor efficacy. S. typhimurium A1-R is auxotrophic only for leu-arg which prevents it from mounting a continuous infection in normal tissues. S. typhimurium A1-R has no other attenuating mutations as does VNP20009. A1-R was able to eradicate primary and metastatic tumors in monotherapy in nude mouse models of prostate, breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer, as well as sarcoma and glioma [11-19]. S. typhimurium A1-R also greatly inhibited bone and brain metastasis of breast cancer in orthotopic mouse models [20, 21]. Tumors with a high degree of vascularity were more sensitive to S. typhimurium A1-R, and vascular destruction appears to play a role in S. typhimurium A1-R antitumor efficacy [22]. The present study compares S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009 for anti-tumor efficacy in a nude mouse model of highly aggressive lung cancer.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Comparison of toxicity of S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009

There was lower toxicity of S. typhimurium A-1R in nude mice compared to S. typhimurium VNP20009. Treatment with S. typhimurium A1-R resulted in less body weight loss than with VNP20009 (p = <0.05) (Figure 1A). There was prolonged survival in mice treated with S. typhimurium A1-R as compared to the non-tumor-bearing mice treated with S. typhimurium VNP20009 (p = 0.005) (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

Comparison of body weight and survival of nude mice without tumors after S. typhimurium A1-R or VNP20009 i.v. administration

Female nude mice, aged 6 weeks, were injected iv with S. typhimurium A1-R or VNP20009 at different doses in 100 μl PBS. Body weight was monitored using an electronic scale. A: Body weight curve comparing S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009 at both doses (p<0.05). B: Kaplan Meir survival curve. n = 5 mice for each group comparing S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009 at both doses (p<0.05)

There were less hemorrhagic spots on the skin and liver in mice treated with S. typhimurium A1-R than VNP20009 (Figure 2). Bleeding foci were found in the liver on day 3 after bacteria injection. However, VNP20009 has more bleeding foci on the liver than in S. typhimurium A1-R-treated mice (p <0.05).
Figure 2

Comparison of overt toxicity of S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009

A: S. typhimurium A1-R treated mice had few hemorrhagic spots on the skin. B: VNP20009 treated mice had more hemorrhagic spots on the skin (white arrows). C: S. typhimurium A1-R treated mice had less bleeding foci on the liver on day 3 after bacteria infection. D: VNP20009 treated mice had more bleeding foci on the liver on the day 3 than S. typhimurium A1-R after bacteria infection (black arrows) (p<0.05)

Comparison of body weight and survival of nude mice without tumors after S. typhimurium A1-R or VNP20009 i.v. administration

Female nude mice, aged 6 weeks, were injected iv with S. typhimurium A1-R or VNP20009 at different doses in 100 μl PBS. Body weight was monitored using an electronic scale. A: Body weight curve comparing S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009 at both doses (p<0.05). B: Kaplan Meir survival curve. n = 5 mice for each group comparing S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009 at both doses (p<0.05)

Comparison of overt toxicity of S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009

A: S. typhimurium A1-R treated mice had few hemorrhagic spots on the skin. B: VNP20009 treated mice had more hemorrhagic spots on the skin (white arrows). C: S. typhimurium A1-R treated mice had less bleeding foci on the liver on day 3 after bacteria infection. D: VNP20009 treated mice had more bleeding foci on the liver on the day 3 than S. typhimurium A1-R after bacteria infection (black arrows) (p<0.05)

Comparison of distribution of S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009 in tumor, liver, spleen, and blood

When the average tumor volume reached approximately 70 mm3, S. typhimurium A1-R (1×107 CFU) or VNP-20009 (1×107 CFU) were injected into the tail vein one time. Tissues were removed 6 days after bacteria administration. Bacteria were isolated from the tumor and organs and cultured in LB agar. Both strains selectively targeted the tumor with greater targeting by S. typhimurium A1-R than VNP20009. VNP20009 had more bacteria in the liver and spleen and blood (p <0.05) (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Comparison of tissue distribution of S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009 in tumor and normal tissues

When the average tumor volume reached approximately 70 mm3, S. typhimurium A1-R (1×107 CFU) or VNP-20009 (1×107 CFU) were injected into the tail vein. Tissues were removed 6 days after bacteria administration. Bacteria were isolated from the tumor and organs and cultured in LB agar (*p<0.05)

Comparison of tissue distribution of S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009 in tumor and normal tissues

When the average tumor volume reached approximately 70 mm3, S. typhimurium A1-R (1×107 CFU) or VNP-20009 (1×107 CFU) were injected into the tail vein. Tissues were removed 6 days after bacteria administration. Bacteria were isolated from the tumor and organs and cultured in LB agar (*p<0.05)

Comparison of efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009

S. typhimurium A1-R reduced tumor growth to a greater extent than VNP20009 (p < 0.05) (Figure 4A). On day 10, a significantly lower tumor burden in mice treated with S. typhimurium A1-R than mice treated with VNP20009 was observed. S. typhimurium A1-R-treated mice had a tumor weight (0.594 g ± 0.23) which was lower than with VNP20009-treated mice (1.378 g ± 0.51) (p<0.05). Control mice had a tumor weight of (2.53 g ± 0.42) which was greater compared to VNP20009-treated mice (p <0.05) or S. typhimurium A1-R-treated mice (p<0.01) (Figure 4B).
Figure 4

Comparison of efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R or VNP20009 on the Lewis lung cancer

When the average tumor volume reached approximately 70 mm3, S. typhimurium A1-R (1×107 CFU) or VNP-20009 (1×107 CFU) were injected into the tail vein once a week. Primary tumor sizes were measured with a caliper. A: Tumor growth curve. B: Tumor weight in S. typhimurium A1-R- and VNP20009-treated mice, as compared to control mice (*p<0.05; **p<0.01) at day 10 after treatment. n = 5 mice for each group

Comparison of efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R or VNP20009 on the Lewis lung cancer

When the average tumor volume reached approximately 70 mm3, S. typhimurium A1-R (1×107 CFU) or VNP-20009 (1×107 CFU) were injected into the tail vein once a week. Primary tumor sizes were measured with a caliper. A: Tumor growth curve. B: Tumor weight in S. typhimurium A1-R- and VNP20009-treated mice, as compared to control mice (*p<0.05; **p<0.01) at day 10 after treatment. n = 5 mice for each group

CONCLUSIONS

S. typhimurium A1-R had lower toxicity in nude mice compared to S. typhimurium VNP20009. S. typhimurium A1-R and S. typhimurium VNP20009 both inhibited growth of the Lewis lung cancer in nude mouse subcutaneous models. However, S. typhimurium A1-R was more efficacious than S. typhimurium VNP20009 on tumor growth inhibition. The results of the present study indicate S. typhimurium A1-R should enter clinical trials as soon as possible. Better results with S. typhimurium A1-R than VNP20009 should be expected since S. typhimurium A1-R is more virulent against the tumor and less toxic against the host. Better results with S. typhimurium A1-R than C. novyi-NT should be expected since S. typhimurium A1-R can be effectively administered systemically and C. novyi-NT seems limited to intratumor administration, possibly precluding it from targeting metastatic disease. A promising application of S. typhimurium A1-R is to decoy cancer cells within tumor to divide and thereby become sensitive to chemotherapy [23]. The bacterial tumor targeting described in the present report can take advantage of previously developed tumor targeting strategies [24-31].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cells

Lewis lung carcinoma cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine (Gibco-BRL, Life Technologies, Inc., Carlsbad, CA). The cell line was cultured at 37°C in a 5% incubator. RFP vector production and transduction of the Lewis lung cancer cell line were performed as previously published [32-34]. The RFP (DsRed-2) gene (Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA) was inserted in the retroviral-based mammalian expression vector pLNCX (Clontech) to form the pLNCX-DsRed-2 vector as previously described [32-34]. For RFP gene transduction, 70% confluent Lewis lung carcinoma cells were incubated with a 1:1 precipitated mixture of pLNCX DsRed-2-retroviral-containing supernatants of PT67 packaging cells and RPMI 1640 or other culture medium (Life Technologies) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals, Norcross, GA) for 72 h and selected using G418 [35].

Mice

Nude mice were from AntiCancer Inc. (San Diego, CA). All mouse studies were conducted with an AntiCancer Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)-protocol specifically approved for this study and in accordance with the principals and procedures outlined in the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Animals under Assurance Number A3873-1. The animals were observed on a daily basis and humanely sacrificed by CO2 inhalation when they met the following humane endpoint criteria: prostration, skin lesions, significant body weight loss, difficulty breathing, epistaxis, rotational motion and body temperature drop. Animals were housed in a barrier facility on a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered rack under standard conditions of 12-hour light/ dark cycles. Animals were housed with no more than 5 per cage. The animals were fed an autoclaved laboratory rodent diet.

Mouse model of aggressive lung cancer

Mouse tumor models were made by subcutaneously injecting Lewis lung carcinoma cells expressing RFP (LLC-RFP) cells (3 × 106 cells/100 μl PBS) in the flank of nude mice [32].

Preparation of S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009

Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing Salmonella typhimurium A1-R bacteria and RFP-labeled VNP20009 were grown overnight in LB medium and then diluted 1:10 in LB medium, respectively. Bacteria were harvested at late-log phase, washed with PBS, and then diluted in PBS. Twenty nude mice, 6 weeks old, were used to compare toxicity of S. typhimurium A1-R and VNP20009. The nude mice were randomized into 4 groups of 5 mice. Group 1 mice were treated with S. typhimurium A1-R (2.5 × 107cfu/100 μl i.v.), once a week for 5 weeks. Group 2 mice were treated with S. typhimurium A1-R (5 × 107cfu/100 μl i.v.), once a week for 5 weeks. Group 3 mice were treated with S. typhimurium VNP20009 (2.5 × 107cfu/100 μL i.v.), once a week for 5 weeks. Group 4 mice were treated VNP20009 (5 × 107cfu/100 μL i.v.), once a week for 5 weeks. All mice were used for survival determination for 35 days post initial treatment.

Efficacy experiments

Group 1 mice served as untreated controls. Ten mice in group 2 were treated with S. typhimurium A1-R (1 × 107cfu/100 μl i.v.), once a week for 2 weeks. Ten mice in group 3 were treated iv with VNP20009 (1 × 107cfu/100 μl i.v.), once a week for 2 weeks. On the 3rd day after treatment, five mice in each group were sacrificed. Bacteria were isolated from tumors, the liver, spleen and blood and cultured in LB agar. For the remaining five mice in each group, the tumors were removed by surgery to compare with the control group on day 10 after treatment. Tumor weight was determined on day 10.

Imaging

Bacteria from the organs were imaged with the Maestro fluorescence imaging system (Perkin-Elmer Inc.). The Maestro multispectral imaging systems contains a liquid crystal tunable filter (LCTF) optically coupled to a CCD camera. Multispectral images are acquired with images typically spaced every 10 nm throughout the desired spectral rang [36-38].
  37 in total

1.  Matching targets for selective cancer therapy.

Authors:  Mikhail V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Bifidobacterium longum as a delivery system for gene therapy of chemically induced rat mammary tumors.

Authors:  K Yazawa; M Fujimori; T Nakamura; T Sasaki; J Amano; Y Kano; S Taniguchi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Treatment with inhibitors of caspases, that are substrates of drug transporters, selectively permits chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in multidrug-resistant cells but protects normal cells.

Authors:  M V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  How cancer could be cured by 2015.

Authors:  Mikhail V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Tumor-targeted Salmonella as a novel anticancer vector.

Authors:  J M Pawelek; K B Low; D Bermudes
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Combination bacteriolytic therapy for the treatment of experimental tumors.

Authors:  L H Dang; C Bettegowda; D L Huso; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phase I study of the intravenous administration of attenuated Salmonella typhimurium to patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  John F Toso; Vee J Gill; Patrick Hwu; Francesco M Marincola; Nicholas P Restifo; Douglas J Schwartzentruber; Richard M Sherry; Suzanne L Topalian; James C Yang; Frida Stock; Linda J Freezer; Kathleen E Morton; Claudia Seipp; Leah Haworth; Sharon Mavroukakis; Donald White; Susan MacDonald; John Mao; Mario Sznol; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Tumor-targeting bacterial therapy with amino acid auxotrophs of GFP-expressing Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  Ming Zhao; Meng Yang; Xiao-Ming Li; Ping Jiang; Eugene Baranov; Shukuan Li; Mingxu Xu; Sheldon Penman; Robert M Hoffman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Bacteria as tumour-targeting vectors.

Authors:  John M Pawelek; K Brooks Low; David Bermudes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 10.  Tissue-selective therapy of cancer.

Authors:  M V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  19 in total

1.  Phenotypic characterization of auxotrophic mutant of nontyphoidal Salmonella and determination of its cytotoxicity, tumor inhibiting cytokine gene expression in cell line models.

Authors:  Kadeeja Jazeela; Anirban Chakraborty; Akshatha Kotian; Vankadari Aditya; Ballamoole Krishna Kumar; Praveen Rai; Indrani Karunasagar; Vijaya Kumar Deekshit
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  Salmonella typhimurium A1-R targeting of a chemotherapy-resistant BRAF-V600E melanoma in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model is enhanced in combination with either vemurafenib or temozolomide.

Authors:  Kei Kawaguchi; Kentaro Igarashi; Takashi Murakami; Tasuku Kiyuna; Ming Zhao; Yong Zhang; Scott D Nelson; Tara A Russell; Sarah M Dry; Arun S Singh; Bartosz Chmielowski; Yunfeng Li; Michiaki Unno; Fritz C Eilber; Robert M Hoffman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Tumor-specific cell-cycle decoy by Salmonella typhimurium A1-R combined with tumor-selective cell-cycle trap by methioninase overcome tumor intrinsic chemoresistance as visualized by FUCCI imaging.

Authors:  Shuya Yano; Kiyoto Takehara; Ming Zhao; Yuying Tan; Qinghong Han; Shukuan Li; Michael Bouvet; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara; Robert M Hoffman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  The irony of highly-effective bacterial therapy of a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model of Ewing's sarcoma, which was blocked by Ewing himself 80 years ago.

Authors:  Takashi Murakami; Tasuku Kiyuna; Kei Kawaguchi; Kentaro Igarashi; Arun S Singh; Yukihiko Hiroshima; Yong Zhang; Ming Zhao; Kentaro Miyake; Scott D Nelson; Sarah M Dry; Yunfeng Li; Jonathan C DeLong; Thinzar M Lwin; Takashi Chishima; Kuniya Tanaka; Michael Bouvet; Itaru Endo; Fritz C Eilber; Robert M Hoffman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Comparison of Anticancer Activities and Biosafety Between Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium ΔppGpp and VNP20009 in a Murine Cancer Model.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Liu; Yanxia Guo; Yujie Sun; Yu Chen; Wenzhi Tan; Jung-Joon Min; Jin Hai Zheng
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.064

6.  Monocytes mediate Salmonella Typhimurium-induced tumor growth inhibition in a mouse melanoma model.

Authors:  Síle A Johnson; Michael J Ormsby; Hannah M Wessel; Heather E Hulme; Alberto Bravo-Blas; Anne McIntosh; Susan Mason; Seth B Coffelt; Stephen W G Tait; Allan McI Mowat; Simon W F Milling; Karen Blyth; Daniel M Wall
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 6.688

7.  Intraperitoneal administration of tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R inhibits disseminated human ovarian cancer and extends survival in nude mice.

Authors:  Yasunori Matsumoto; Shinji Miwa; Yong Zhang; Ming Zhao; Shuya Yano; Fuminari Uehara; Mako Yamamoto; Yukihiko Hiroshima; Makoto Toneri; Michael Bouvet; Hisahiro Matsubara; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya; Robert M Hoffman
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-05-10

8.  Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R in combination with doxorubicin eradicate soft tissue sarcoma in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model.

Authors:  Takashi Murakami; Jonathan DeLong; Fritz C Eilber; Ming Zhao; Yong Zhang; Nan Zhang; Arun Singh; Tara Russell; Samantha Deng; Jose Reynoso; Cuong Quan; Yukihiko Hiroshima; Ryusei Matsuyama; Takashi Chishima; Kuniya Tanaka; Michael Bouvet; Sant Chawla; Itaru Endo; Robert M Hoffman
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-15

9.  Suppression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma growth by intratumoral delivery of attenuated Salmonella typhimurium using a dual fluorescent live tracking system.

Authors:  Sujin Zhou; Zhenggang Zhao; Yan Lin; Sijia Gong; Fanghong Li; Jinshun Pan; Xiaoxi Li; Zhuo Gao; Allan Z Zhao
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 10.  Bacteria-Mediated Synergistic Cancer Therapy: Small Microbiome Has a Big Hope.

Authors:  Xinyu Lou; Zhichao Chen; Zhonggui He; Mengchi Sun; Jin Sun
Journal:  Nanomicro Lett       Date:  2021-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.