| Literature DB >> 25713660 |
Anna Zwierzchowska1, Marta Głowacz1, Agnieszka Batko-Szwaczka2, Joanna Dudzińska-Griszek2, Aleksandra Mostowik3, Miłosz Drozd3, Jan Szewieczek2.
Abstract
The enforced sedentary lifestyle and muscle paresis below the level of injury are associated with adipose tissue accumulation in the trunk. The value of anthropometric indicators of obesity in patients with spinal cord injuries has also been called into question. We hypothesized that the Body Mass Index recommended by the WHO to diagnose obesity in general population has too low sensitivity in case of wheelchair rugby players. The study group comprised 14 wheelchair rugby players, aged 32.6 ± 5.1 years, who had sustained CSCI (paralysis of lower limbs and upper extremities). The research tool was the Tanita Viscan visceral and trunk fat analyzer AB140 using the abdominal bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) to estimate the visceral fat level (Vfat) and trunk fat percentage (Tfat). The AB140 analyzer also allowed the measurement of body composition of those individuals who could not assume an upright position. Our analyses revealed high and very high correlation coefficients between Vfat and WC (r=0.9), WHtR (r=0.7) and Tfat (r=0.9) whereas the correlation between Vfat and the BMI was weak, especially in the subgroup with Vfat < 13.5% (r=0.2). The subgroup with Vfat>13.5 exhibited a moderate-level relationship between the BMI and visceral fat increase. It was concluded that the BMI had a low sensitivity for predicting obesity risk in wheelchair rugby players after CSCI. The sensitivity of WC measurement was higher and thus, it may be stated that it constitutes an objective tool for predicting obesity risk in post-CSCI wheelchair rugby players.Entities:
Keywords: obesity; spinal cord injury; visceral fat; wheelchair rugby players
Year: 2014 PMID: 25713660 PMCID: PMC4332180 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Characteristics of subjects after CSCI
| Age (years) | 25–40 | 32.6 ± 5.1 |
| Time after injury (years) | 6–24 | 12.5 ± 5.7 |
| Age at the time of injury (years) | 15–26 | 20.1 ± 3.6 |
Obesity risk in the study group according to anthropometric indicators of obesity
| Group size | BMI≤25 | BMI>25 | WC ≤94 | WC >94 | Tfat≤26 | Tfat>26 | Vfat≤13.5 | Vfat>13.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| n = 11 | n = 3 | n = 7 | n = 7 | n=5 | n=9 | n=8 | n=6 | |
| 21.8 ± 2.3 | 27.2 ± 0.8 | 85.7 ±4.1 | 98.7±5.2 | 25.1±3.1 | 37.5±4.6 | 10.4±1.8 | 17.5±4.7 | |
| T test | 0.05[ | 0.01[ | 0.01[ | 0.01[ | ||||
Visceral fat level (Vfat) and trunk fat (Tfat) percentage (%)
differences between the means were significant at p<0.01; p<0.05
Verification of anthropometric indicators of obesity and cardiometabolic disease in Vfat subgroups(x̄ ± sd)
| <13.5 | 8 | 68.88 ± 10.06 | 178.38 ± 5.40 | 21.60 ± 2.5 | 86.63±4.6 | 92.75±6.9 | 0.94±0.07 | 49±2 | 4.13 ± 1.9 | 25.10±3.3 |
| T test p<0.05 | 0.01[ | ns | ns | 0.01[ | ns | 0.04[ | 0.03[ | 0.03[ | 0.01[ | |
| >13.5 | 6 | 82.67±4.5 | 183.3±10.1 | 24.78±3 | 99.67±5 | 98.33±7.5 | 1.02±0.06 | 55±5 | 2.00±1.3 | 35.47±6.5 |
BM(kg)- body mass, BH(cm)-body height, BMI (kg/m) CCIE (cm) - difference between chest circumference in full inhalation and exhalation, Tfat(%)- trunk fat percentage, Vfat(%)- visceral FAT percentage;
differences between the means were significant at p<0.01; p<0.05; ns – non-significant
Correlation coefficients in Vfat subgroups
| Indicators | V fat <13.5 | V fat >13.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n=8 | n=6 | n=14 | |
| BM (kg) | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 |
| BH (cm) | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| WC (cm) | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| HC (cm) | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| WHR (%) | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| WHtR (%) | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| Tfat (%) | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| CCIE (cm) | −0.8 | −0.3 | −0.3 |
significant p<0.05;
BM(kg)- body mass, BH(cm)-body height, BMI (kg/m) CCIE (cm) - difference between chest circumference in full inhalation and exhalation, Tfat(%)- trunk fat percentage, Vfat(%)- visceral fat percentage;