| Literature DB >> 25713643 |
Marieni Bello1, Maria Cirilo Sousa2, Gabriel Neto2, Leonardo Oliveira3, Ialuska Guerras4, Romeu Mendes5, Nelson Sousa5.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a community-based exercise program on bone mineral density and body composition in postmenopausal women with pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Twenty postmenopausal women (aged 61.3 ± 6.0 years) with pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to a community-based exercise program group (n=10) or a control group (n=10). The community-based exercise program was multicomponent, three days per week for 32 weeks, and included walking, resistance and aquatic exercises. Body composition and bone mineral density were measured pre and post-training by dual X-ray absorptiometry. In the exercise group significant increases were found in the ward's triangle bone mineral density (+7.8%, p=0.043), and in fat-free mass (+2.4%, p=0.018). The findings suggest that regular multicomponent training is effective in preventing osteoporosis and sarcopenia among postmenopausal women with pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: aging; bone density; diabetes mellitus; exercise; fat-free mass; females
Year: 2014 PMID: 25713643 PMCID: PMC4332183 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Figure 1A summary of the recruitment strategy and allocation
Pre- and post-training values and changes of body fat, fat-free mass, and bone mineral density for femoral neck, greater trochanter, ward’s triangle, total hip and whole body, over experimental protocol for both groups.
| CON (n = 7) | MTG (n = 7) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Pre | Post | Δ% | Pre | Post | Δ% | |||
| BF (%) | 26.05 ± 6.5 | 26.25 ± 7.00 | 0,72 | 0.202 | 25,39±4.98 | 24.87 ± 5.16 | −2,0 | 0.059 |
| FFM (kg) | 38.88 ± 6.1 | 37.18 ± 5.71 | −4.4 | 0.007 | 37.77 ± 6.57 | 39.290 ± 5.96 | 4,0 | 0.005 |
| FN (g/cm2) | 0.76 ± 0.07 | 0.76 ± 0.08 | 0,0 | 0.646 | 0.81 ± 0.11 | 0.84 ± 0.11 | 3,7 | 0.092 |
| GT (g/cm2) | 0.72 ± 0.07 | 0.71 ± 0.06 | −1,4 | 0.332 | 0.68 ± 0.06 | 0.69 ± 0.08 | 1.5 | 0.329 |
| WT (g/cm2) | 0.64 ± 0.08 | 0.62 ± 0.10 | −2,8 | 1.000 | 0.67 ± 0.12 | 0.72 ± 0.14 | 7.5 | 0.009 |
| TH (g/cm2) | 1.05 ± 0.12 | 1.14 ± 0.45 | 8.6 | 0.063 | 1.07 ± 0.16 | 1.07 ± 0.18 | 0.0 | 0.499 |
| WB (g/cm2) | 0.78 ± 0.07 | 0.77 ± 0.09 | −1.3 | 0.380 | 0.78 ± 0.15 | 0.80 ± 0.17 | 2.6 | 0.178 |
Values are mean ± S.E. CON: control group; MEG: multicomponent training exercise group; BF: body fat; FFM: fat-free mass; FN: femoral neck; GT: greater trochanter; WT: ward’s triangle; TH: total hip; WB: whole body. Δ% = [(post-training–pre-training)/pre-training]*100. p = values for pre-training vs. post-training