Daniel R Mueller1, Stefanie J Schmidt2, Volker Roder3. 1. University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; 2. University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 3. University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; roder@sunrise.ch.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Cognitive remediation (CR) approaches have demonstrated to be effective in improving cognitive functions in schizophrenia. However, there is a lack of integrated CR approaches that target multiple neuro- and social-cognitive domains with a special focus on the generalization of therapy effects to functional outcome. METHOD: This 8-site randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of a novel CR group therapy approach called integrated neurocognitive therapy (INT). INT includes well-defined exercises to improve all neuro- and social-cognitive domains as defined by the Measurement And Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative by compensation and restitution. One hundred and fifty-six outpatients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder according to DSM-IV-TR or ICD-10 were randomly assigned to receive 15 weeks of INT or treatment as usual (TAU). INT patients received 30 bi-weekly therapy sessions. Each session lasted 90min. Mixed models were applied to assess changes in neurocognition, social cognition, symptoms, and functional outcome at post-treatment and at 9-month follow-up. RESULTS: In comparison to TAU, INT patients showed significant improvements in several neuro- and social-cognitive domains, negative symptoms, and functional outcome after therapy and at 9-month follow-up. Number-needed-to-treat analyses indicate that only 5 INT patients are necessary to produce durable and meaningful improvements in functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated interventions on neurocognition and social cognition have the potential to improve not only cognitive performance but also functional outcome. These findings are important as treatment guidelines for schizophrenia have criticized CR for its poor generalization effects.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Cognitive remediation (CR) approaches have demonstrated to be effective in improving cognitive functions in schizophrenia. However, there is a lack of integrated CR approaches that target multiple neuro- and social-cognitive domains with a special focus on the generalization of therapy effects to functional outcome. METHOD: This 8-site randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of a novel CR group therapy approach called integrated neurocognitive therapy (INT). INT includes well-defined exercises to improve all neuro- and social-cognitive domains as defined by the Measurement And Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative by compensation and restitution. One hundred and fifty-six outpatients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder according to DSM-IV-TR or ICD-10 were randomly assigned to receive 15 weeks of INT or treatment as usual (TAU). INT patients received 30 bi-weekly therapy sessions. Each session lasted 90min. Mixed models were applied to assess changes in neurocognition, social cognition, symptoms, and functional outcome at post-treatment and at 9-month follow-up. RESULTS: In comparison to TAU, INT patients showed significant improvements in several neuro- and social-cognitive domains, negative symptoms, and functional outcome after therapy and at 9-month follow-up. Number-needed-to-treat analyses indicate that only 5 INT patients are necessary to produce durable and meaningful improvements in functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated interventions on neurocognition and social cognition have the potential to improve not only cognitive performance but also functional outcome. These findings are important as treatment guidelines for schizophrenia have criticized CR for its poor generalization effects.
Authors: Shaun M Eack; Deborah P Greenwald; Susan S Hogarty; Susan J Cooley; Ann Louise DiBarry; Debra M Montrose; Matcheri S Keshavan Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Keith H Nuechterlein; Deanna M Barch; James M Gold; Terry E Goldberg; Michael F Green; Robert K Heaton Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Robert S Kern; Keith H Nuechterlein; Michael F Green; Lyle E Baade; Wayne S Fenton; James M Gold; Richard S E Keefe; Raquelle Mesholam-Gately; Jim Mintz; Larry J Seidman; Ellen Stover; Stephen R Marder Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-01-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Javier Peña; Naroa Ibarretxe-Bilbao; Pedro Sánchez; Maria B Iriarte; Edorta Elizagarate; Maria A Garay; Miguel Gutiérrez; Aránzazu Iribarren; Natalia Ojeda Journal: NPJ Schizophr Date: 2016-11-09
Authors: Iris E Sommer; Carrie E Bearden; Edwin van Dellen; Elemi J Breetvelt; Sasja N Duijff; Kim Maijer; Therese van Amelsvoort; Lieuwe de Haan; Raquel E Gur; Celso Arango; Covadonga M Díaz-Caneja; Christiaan H Vinkers; Jacob As Vorstman Journal: NPJ Schizophr Date: 2016-03-09
Authors: Sebastian Walther; Sarah Eisenhardt; Stephan Bohlhalter; Tim Vanbellingen; René Müri; Werner Strik; Katharina Stegmayer Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 9.306