Literature DB >> 25713398

On-farm comparison of keel fracture prevalence and other welfare indicators in conventional cage and floor-housed laying hens in Ontario, Canada.

Mike T Petrik1, Michele T Guerin2, Tina M Widowski3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the flock-level prevalence of healed keel bone fractures and to benchmark other indicators of well-being in laying hens housed in conventional cages and single-tier floor housing systems at several points during the production period. Commercial farms in Ontario, Canada, that housed hens in cages (n=9) or floor barns (n=8) were included. Flocks were beak-trimmed brown hens of various strains. Each flock was visited at 20, 35, 50, and 65 wk of age. At each visit, 50 hens were weighed, palpated for healed keel fractures, and feather scored over 4 areas of the body. Data were collected from the farm records on cumulative mortality. Keel fracture prevalence was higher in floor-housed flocks compared to cage-housed flocks (48.3±0.04% vs. 24.8±0.03%; P<0.001). The majority of keel fractures occurred by 50 wk. Cumulative mortality tended to be higher in floor-housed flocks compared to cage-housed flocks (2.13±0.42% vs. 1.29±0.19%; P=0.078). Mean BW was lower (1,827±28.8 g vs. 1,888±26.8 g; P=0.02) yet more uniform (CV of BW 9.43±0.40% vs. 10.10±0.32%; P<0.001) in floor-housed flocks compared to cage-housed flocks. Feather condition was not affected by housing system type (P=0.618), although it declined with age (P<0.001). Individual hen factors assessed using Pearson partial correlations indicated that hens with fractures were heavier at 65 wk in both housing types (P<0.05) and that heavier hens housed on the floor had better feather scores (P<0.001) from 35 wk onward. Floor-housed hens with fractures had lower feather scores at 35 wk (P<0.05) but not at 50 or 65 wk. Housing hens in single-tier floor systems increased the flock-level prevalence of keel fractures and resulted in a lower, yet more uniform, BW compared to hens in conventional cages under commercial conditions in Ontario. Benchmarking welfare indicators from alternative housing systems for laying hens is important to ensure that progress is made in improving their well-being.
© 2015 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feather condition; keel bone fracture; laying hen; welfare

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25713398     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  27 in total

Review 1.  The Diverse Roles of 17β-Estradiol in Non-Gonadal Tissues and Its Consequential Impact on Reproduction in Laying and Broiler Breeder Hens.

Authors:  Charlene Hanlon; Clara J Ziezold; Grégoy Y Bédécarrats
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Wing-feather loss in white-feathered laying hens decreases pectoralis thickness but does not increase risk of keel bone fracture.

Authors:  Renée Garant; Bret W Tobalske; Neila Ben Sassi; Nienke van Staaveren; Tina Widowski; Donald R Powers; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.653

3.  Behavioral Differences of Laying Hens with Fractured Keel Bones within Furnished Cages.

Authors:  Teresa M Casey-Trott; Tina M Widowski
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-05-31

4.  Welfare Consequences of Omitting Beak Trimming in Barn Layers.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Lena K Hinrichsen
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-18

5.  Relationship between Bone Stability and Egg Production in Genetically Divergent Chicken Layer Lines.

Authors:  Simon Jansen; Ulrich Baulain; Christin Habig; Annett Weigend; Ingrid Halle; Armin Manfred Scholz; Henner Simianer; Ahmad Reza Sharifi; Steffen Weigend
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Implications for Welfare, Productivity and Sustainability of the Variation in Reported Levels of Mortality for Laying Hen Flocks Kept in Different Housing Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Ten Studies.

Authors:  Claire A Weeks; Sarah L Lambton; Adrian G Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The Influence of Keel Bone Damage on Welfare of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Teresa M Casey-Trott; Mette S Herskin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-02-28

8.  Effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages, Part I: Performance and well-being.

Authors:  T M Widowski; L J Caston; M E Hunniford; L Cooley; S Torrey
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Radiographic examination of keel bone damage in living laying hens of different strains kept in two housing systems.

Authors:  Beryl Katharina Eusemann; Ulrich Baulain; Lars Schrader; Christa Thöne-Reineke; Antonia Patt; Stefanie Petow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Modeling collisions in laying hens as a tool to identify causative factors for keel bone fractures and means to reduce their occurrence and severity.

Authors:  Michael Toscano; Francesca Booth; Gemma Richards; Steven Brown; Darrin Karcher; John Tarlton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.