Literature DB >> 25713370

Decorrelation of retinal response to natural scenes by fixational eye movements.

Irina Yonit Segal1, Chen Giladi1, Michael Gedalin1, Michele Rucci2, Mor Ben-Tov3, Yam Kushinsky1, Alik Mokeichev4, Ronen Segev5.   

Abstract

Under natural viewing conditions the input to the retina is a complex spatiotemporal signal that depends on both the scene and the way the observer moves. It is commonly assumed that the retina processes this input signal efficiently by taking into account the statistics of the natural world. It has recently been argued that incessant microscopic eye movements contribute to this process by decorrelating the input to the retina. Here we tested this theory by measuring the responses of the salamander retina to stimuli replicating the natural input signals experienced by the retina in the presence and absence of fixational eye movements. Contrary to the predictions of classic theories of efficient encoding that do not take behavior into account, we show that the response characteristics of retinal ganglion cells are not sufficient in themselves to disrupt the broad correlations of natural scenes. Specifically, retinal ganglion cells exhibited strong and extensive spatial correlations in the absence of fixational eye movements. However, the levels of correlation in the neural responses dropped in the presence of fixational eye movements, resulting in effective decorrelation of the channels streaming information to the brain. These observations confirm the predictions that microscopic eye movements act to reduce correlations in retinal responses and contribute to visual information processing.

Keywords:  correlation; fixational eye movement; neural coding; retina

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25713370      PMCID: PMC4364215          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1412059112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  Decorrelation and efficient coding by retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Xaq Pitkow; Markus Meister
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Segregation of object and background motion in the retina.

Authors:  Bence P Olveczky; Stephen A Baccus; Markus Meister
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Recording spikes from a large fraction of the ganglion cells in a retinal patch.

Authors:  Ronen Segev; Joe Goodhouse; Jason Puchalla; Michael J Berry
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Redundancy in the population code of the retina.

Authors:  Jason L Puchalla; Elad Schneidman; Robert A Harris; Michael J Berry
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Vision with a stabilized retinal image.

Authors:  R W DITCHBURN; B L GINSBORG
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1952-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images.

Authors:  B A Olshausen; D J Field
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  J H van Hateren; A van der Schaaf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The extraordinarily rapid disappearance of entoptic images.

Authors:  D Coppola; D Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Temporal encoding of spatial information during active visual fixation.

Authors:  Xutao Kuang; Martina Poletti; Jonathan D Victor; Michele Rucci
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Multi-neuronal signals from the retina: acquisition and analysis.

Authors:  M Meister; J Pine; D A Baylor
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Temporal Coding of Visual Space.

Authors:  Michele Rucci; Ehud Ahissar; David Burr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Natural image and receptive field statistics predict saccade sizes.

Authors:  Jason M Samonds; Wilson S Geisler; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  A quantitative description of macaque ganglion cell responses to natural scenes: the interplay of time and space.

Authors:  Manuel Schottdorf; Barry B Lee
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Global Jitter Motion of the Retinal Image Dynamically Alters the Receptive Field Properties of Retinal Ganglion Cells.

Authors:  Akihiro Matsumoto; Masao Tachibana
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Contrast sensitivity reveals an oculomotor strategy for temporally encoding space.

Authors:  Antonino Casile; Jonathan D Victor; Michele Rucci
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Receptive field center-surround interactions mediate context-dependent spatial contrast encoding in the retina.

Authors:  Maxwell H Turner; Gregory W Schwartz; Fred Rieke
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.