Antony Prabhu1, Bhaswati Sarcar1, C Ryan Miller1, Sung-Hak Kim1, Ichiro Nakano1, Peter Forsyth1, Prakash Chinnaiyan1. 1. Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida (A.P., B.S., P.C.); Chemical Biology and Molecular Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida (A.P., B.S., P.F., P.C.); Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida (P.F.); Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida (P.C.); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Neurology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.); Department of Neurologic Surgery and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (S-H.K., I.N.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Even though altered metabolism representing a hallmark of cancer was proposed nearly a century ago, recent technological advances have allowed investigators to continue uncovering a previously unrecognized complexity of metabolic programs that drive tumorigenesis beyond that of aerobic glycolysis. METHODS: The bioenergetic state of a diverse panel of glioblastoma models, including isogenic lines derived from a genetically engineered adult astrocytic mouse model and patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells, was determined at baseline and in stressed conditions. Mechanisms contributing to the discovered metabolic phenotypes were determined through molecular and chemical perturbation, and their biological consequences were evaluated in vivo and in patient samples. RESULTS: Attenuated mitochondrial reserve capacity was identified as a common metabolic phenotype in glioblastoma lines. This phenotype was linked mechanistically with the capacity of Ras-mediated signaling to inhibit pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activity through downregulation of PDH phosphatase (PDP) expression. PDP1 repression was validated clinically in patient-derived samples, suggesting that aberrant cellular signaling typical of glioblastoma actively modulates PDH activity. This phenotype was reversed through both chemical and molecular perturbation. Restoration of PDH activity through stable expression of PDP1-impaired tumorigenic potential. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the central role that PDH regulation plays as a downstream consequence of aberrant signaling associated with gliomagenesis and the scientific rationale to continue to develop and test clinical strategies designed to activate PDH as a form of anticancer therapy in glioblastoma.
BACKGROUND: Even though altered metabolism representing a hallmark of cancer was proposed nearly a century ago, recent technological advances have allowed investigators to continue uncovering a previously unrecognized complexity of metabolic programs that drive tumorigenesis beyond that of aerobic glycolysis. METHODS: The bioenergetic state of a diverse panel of glioblastoma models, including isogenic lines derived from a genetically engineered adult astrocytic mouse model and patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells, was determined at baseline and in stressed conditions. Mechanisms contributing to the discovered metabolic phenotypes were determined through molecular and chemical perturbation, and their biological consequences were evaluated in vivo and in patient samples. RESULTS: Attenuated mitochondrial reserve capacity was identified as a common metabolic phenotype in glioblastoma lines. This phenotype was linked mechanistically with the capacity of Ras-mediated signaling to inhibit pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activity through downregulation of PDH phosphatase (PDP) expression. PDP1 repression was validated clinically in patient-derived samples, suggesting that aberrant cellular signaling typical of glioblastoma actively modulates PDH activity. This phenotype was reversed through both chemical and molecular perturbation. Restoration of PDH activity through stable expression of PDP1-impaired tumorigenic potential. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the central role that PDH regulation plays as a downstream consequence of aberrant signaling associated with gliomagenesis and the scientific rationale to continue to develop and test clinical strategies designed to activate PDH as a form of anticancer therapy in glioblastoma.
Authors: Jason W Locasale; Alexandra R Grassian; Tamar Melman; Costas A Lyssiotis; Katherine R Mattaini; Adam J Bass; Gregory Heffron; Christian M Metallo; Taru Muranen; Hadar Sharfi; Atsuo T Sasaki; Dimitrios Anastasiou; Edouard Mullarky; Natalie I Vokes; Mika Sasaki; Rameen Beroukhim; Gregory Stephanopoulos; Azra H Ligon; Matthew Meyerson; Andrea L Richardson; Lynda Chin; Gerhard Wagner; John M Asara; Joan S Brugge; Lewis C Cantley; Matthew G Vander Heiden Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2011-07-31 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Richard Possemato; Kevin M Marks; Yoav D Shaul; Michael E Pacold; Dohoon Kim; Kıvanç Birsoy; Shalini Sethumadhavan; Hin-Koon Woo; Hyun G Jang; Abhishek K Jha; Walter W Chen; Francesca G Barrett; Nicolas Stransky; Zhi-Yang Tsun; Glenn S Cowley; Jordi Barretina; Nada Y Kalaany; Peggy P Hsu; Kathleen Ottina; Albert M Chan; Bingbing Yuan; Levi A Garraway; David E Root; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Elena F Brachtel; Edward M Driggers; David M Sabatini Journal: Nature Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jose L Izquierdo-Garcia; Pavithra Viswanath; Pia Eriksson; Larry Cai; Marina Radoul; Myriam M Chaumeil; Michael Blough; H Artee Luchman; Samuel Weiss; J Gregory Cairncross; Joanna J Phillips; Russell O Pieper; Sabrina M Ronen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Shiva Kant; Pravin Kesarwani; Anthony R Guastella; Praveen Kumar; Stewart F Graham; Katie L Buelow; Ichiro Nakano; Prakash Chinnaiyan Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Sophia Doll; Anatoly Urisman; Juan A Oses-Prieto; David Arnott; Alma L Burlingame Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Pravin Kesarwani; Antony Prabhu; Shiva Kant; Praveen Kumar; Stewart F Graham; Katie L Buelow; George D Wilson; C Ryan Miller; Prakash Chinnaiyan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 12.531