Literature DB >> 25712343

Evaluating patient-derived colorectal cancer xenografts as preclinical models by comparison with patient clinical data.

Manoel Nunes1, Patricia Vrignaud1, Sophie Vacher2, Sophie Richon3, Astrid Lièvre4, Wulfran Cacheux5, Louis-Bastien Weiswald3, Gerald Massonnet6, Sophie Chateau-Joubert7, André Nicolas8, Colette Dib1, Weidong Zhang1, James Watters1, Donald Bergstrom1, Sergio Roman-Roman6, Ivan Bièche9, Virginie Dangles-Marie10.   

Abstract

Development of targeted therapeutics required translationally relevant preclinical models with well-characterized cancer genome alterations. Here, by studying 52 colorectal patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDX), we examined key molecular alterations of the IGF2-PI3K and ERBB-RAS pathways and response to cetuximab. PDX molecular data were compared with that published for patient colorectal tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas. We demonstrated a significant pattern of mutual exclusivity of genomic abnormalities in the IGF2-PI3K and ERBB-RAS pathways. The genomic anomaly frequencies observed in microsatellite stable PDX reproduce those detected in nonhypermutated patient tumors. We found frequent IGF2 upregulation (16%), which was mutually exclusive with IRS2, PIK3CA, PTEN, and INPP4B alterations, supporting IGF2 as a potential drug target. In addition to maintaining the genomic and histologic diversity, correct preclinical models need to reproduce drug response observed in patients. Responses of PDXs to cetuximab recapitulate also clinical data in patients, with partial or complete response in 15% (8 of 52) of PDXs and response strictly restricted to KRAS wild-type models. The response rate reaches 53% (8 of 15) when KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS mutations are concomitantly excluded, proving a functional cross-validation of predictive biomarkers obtained retrospectively in patients. Collectively, these results show that, because of their clinical relevance, colorectal PDXs are appropriate tools to identify both new targets, like IGF2, and predictive biomarkers of response/resistance to targeted therapies. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25712343     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  29 in total

Review 1.  Patient-derived xenograft models for personalized medicine in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jun Xie; Yan Lin
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 2.  Interrogating open issues in cancer precision medicine with patient-derived xenografts.

Authors:  Annette T Byrne; Denis G Alférez; Frédéric Amant; Daniela Annibali; Joaquín Arribas; Andrew V Biankin; Alejandra Bruna; Eva Budinská; Carlos Caldas; David K Chang; Robert B Clarke; Hans Clevers; George Coukos; Virginie Dangles-Marie; S Gail Eckhardt; Eva Gonzalez-Suarez; Els Hermans; Manuel Hidalgo; Monika A Jarzabek; Steven de Jong; Jos Jonkers; Kristel Kemper; Luisa Lanfrancone; Gunhild Mari Mælandsmo; Elisabetta Marangoni; Jean-Christophe Marine; Enzo Medico; Jens Henrik Norum; Héctor G Palmer; Daniel S Peeper; Pier Giuseppe Pelicci; Alejandro Piris-Gimenez; Sergio Roman-Roman; Oscar M Rueda; Joan Seoane; Violeta Serra; Laura Soucek; Dominique Vanhecke; Alberto Villanueva; Emilie Vinolo; Andrea Bertotti; Livio Trusolino
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Modeling of Patient-Derived Xenografts in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Anastasia Katsiampoura; Kanwal Raghav; Zhi-Qin Jiang; David G Menter; Andreas Varkaris; Maria P Morelli; Shanequa Manuel; Ji Wu; Alexey V Sorokin; Bahar Salimian Rizi; Christopher Bristow; Feng Tian; Susan Airhart; Mingshan Cheng; Bradley M Broom; Jeffrey Morris; Michael J Overman; Garth Powis; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Bitter melon juice intake with gemcitabine intervention circumvents resistance to gemcitabine in pancreatic patient-derived xenograft tumors.

Authors:  Deepanshi Dhar; Komal Raina; Dileep Kumar; Michael F Wempe; Stacey M Bagby; Todd M Pitts; David J Orlicky; Chapla Agarwal; Wells A Messersmith; Rajesh Agarwal
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 5.  Cancer Prevention: Obstacles, Challenges and the Road Ahead.

Authors:  Frank L Meyskens; Hasan Mukhtar; Cheryl L Rock; Jack Cuzick; Thomas W Kensler; Chung S Yang; Scott D Ramsey; Scott M Lippman; David S Alberts
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The Molecular Basis of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah F Andres; Kathy N Williams; Anil K Rustgi
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2018-03-01

Review 7.  Patient-derived xenografts: a relevant preclinical model for drug development.

Authors:  Luca Pompili; Manuela Porru; Carla Caruso; Annamaria Biroccio; Carlo Leonetti
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-05

8.  In vivo and ex vivo cetuximab sensitivity assay using three-dimensional primary culture system to stratify KRAS mutant colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takahiro Tashiro; Hiroaki Okuyama; Hiroko Endo; Kenji Kawada; Yasuko Ashida; Masayuki Ohue; Yoshiharu Sakai; Masahiro Inoue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A natural small molecule, catechol, induces c-Myc degradation by directly targeting ERK2 in lung cancer.

Authors:  Do Young Lim; Seung Ho Shin; Mee-Hyun Lee; Margarita Malakhova; Igor Kurinov; Qiong Wu; Jinglong Xu; Yanan Jiang; Ziming Dong; Kangdong Liu; Kun Yeong Lee; Ki Beom Bae; Bu Young Choi; Yibin Deng; Ann Bode; Zigang Dong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-06-07

10.  Assessing Concordance of Drug-Induced Transcriptional Response in Rodent Liver and Cultured Hepatocytes.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Sutherland; Robert A Jolly; Keith M Goldstein; James L Stevens
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.