Literature DB >> 25712142

Interaction of PiB-derivative metal complexes with beta-amyloid peptides: selective recognition of the aggregated forms.

André F Martins1, David M Dias, Jean-François Morfin, Sara Lacerda, Douglas V Laurents, Éva Tóth, Carlos F G C Geraldes.   

Abstract

Metal complexes are increasingly explored as imaging probes in amyloid peptide related pathologies. We report the first detailed study on the mechanism of interaction between a metal complex and both the monomer and the aggregated form of Aβ1-40 peptide. We have studied lanthanide(III) chelates of two PiB-derivative ligands (PiB=Pittsburgh compound B), L(1) and L(2), differing in the length of the spacer between the metal-complexing DO3A macrocycle (DO3A=1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triacetic acid) and the peptide-recognition PiB moiety. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and saturation transfer difference (STD) NMR spectroscopy revealed that they both bind to aggregated Aβ1-40 (KD =67-160 μM), primarily through the benzothiazole unit. HSQC NMR spectroscopy on the (15) N-labeled, monomer Aβ1-40 peptide indicates nonsignificant interaction with monomeric Aβ. Time-dependent circular dichroism (CD), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and TEM investigations of the secondary structure and of the aggregation of Aβ1-40 in the presence of increasing amounts of the metal complexes provide coherent data showing that, despite their structural similarity, the two complexes affect Aβ fibril formation distinctly. Whereas GdL(1), at higher concentrations, stabilizes β-sheets, GdL(2) prevents aggregation by promoting α-helical structures. These results give insight into the behavior of amyloid-targeted metal complexes in general and contribute to a more rational design of metal-based diagnostic and therapeutic agents for amyloid- associated pathologies.
© 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; amyloid aggregation; amyloid plaques; contrast agent; lanthanides; peptides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25712142     DOI: 10.1002/chem.201406152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemistry        ISSN: 0947-6539            Impact factor:   5.236


  5 in total

Review 1.  Chemistry of MRI Contrast Agents: Current Challenges and New Frontiers.

Authors:  Jessica Wahsner; Eric M Gale; Aurora Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Associating a negatively charged GdDOTA-derivative to the Pittsburgh compound B for targeting Aβ amyloid aggregates.

Authors:  André F Martins; Alexandre C Oliveira; Jean-François Morfin; Douglas V Laurents; Éva Tóth; Carlos F G C Geraldes
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  Gallium-68 Complexes Conjugated to Pittsburgh Compound B: Radiolabeling and Biological Evaluation.

Authors:  Damien Cressier; Martine Dhilly; Thang T Cao Pham; Fabien Fillesoye; Fabienne Gourand; Auriane Maïza; André F Martins; Jean-François Morfin; Carlos F G C Geraldes; Éva Tóth; Louisa Barré
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Magnetic Nanoparticles Applications for Amyloidosis Study and Detection: A Review.

Authors:  Jonathan Pansieri; Matthieu Gerstenmayer; François Lux; Sebastien Mériaux; Olivier Tillement; Vincent Forge; Benoit Larrat; Christel Marquette
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Characterization of chlorophyll binding to LIL3.

Authors:  Astrid Elisabeth Mork-Jansson; Lutz Andreas Eichacker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.