Literature DB >> 25711637

Normative distribution of visual acuity in 3- to 6-year-old Chinese preschoolers: the Shenzhen kindergarten eye study.

Xinxing Guo1, Min Fu2, Juan Lü2, Qixia Chen2, Yangfa Zeng1, Xiaohu Ding1, Ian G Morgan3, Mingguang He4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To document the distribution of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) in a defined population of Chinese preschoolers and to discuss its implications for vision referral.
METHODS: Preschoolers aged 3 to 6 years old were recruited from kindergartens in Shenzen. Uncorrected visual acuity was estimated by using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Tumbling E charts, followed by cycloplegic refraction and ocular examination. The reference population was defined as children without clinically significant ocular abnormalities, with spherical equivalent refraction greater than -0.50 to less than +2.00 diopters (D), astigmatism less than 0.75 D, and anisometropia less than 2.00 D. The age-specific UCVA cutoffs were defined by the line where the single-sided 95th percentile of the reference population fell.
RESULTS: A total of 483 of the 1255 children enrolled were considered the reference population. The monocular UCVA cutoff fell on the line of 20/63 at age 3, 20/50 at age 4, and 20/40 at ages 5 and 6. Using no better than these lines as criteria generated referral rates of 9.4% to 27.8% in the general population at different ages, and detected 83.3% and more than 90.0% of those with myopia and amblyopia, respectively. Using uncorrected interocular difference of two or more lines referred 3.6% to 4.3% of the population but identified only approximately 20.0% of those with amblyopia.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity is still developing in preschoolers even at age 6. Most children with myopia and amblyopia can be identified with age-specific, monocular UCVA cutoffs in vision screening using Tumbling E charts, with tolerable false-positive rates. Further studies are needed to define the age at which children without significant refractive errors reach 20/20 UCVA. Copyright 2015 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  normative distribution; vision screening; visual acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25711637     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  10 in total

1.  The prevalence and causes of pediatric uncorrected refractive error: Pooled data from population studies for Global Burden of Disease (GBD) sub-regions.

Authors:  He Cao; Xiang Cao; Zhi Cao; Lu Zhang; Yue Han; Changchun Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Vision screening at two years does not reduce the prevalence of reduced vision at four and a half years of age.

Authors:  Lucy Goodman; Arijit Chakraborty; Nabin Paudel; Tzu-Ying Yu; Robert J Jacobs; Jane E Harding; Benjamin Thompson; Nicola S Anstice
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Investigating the Visual Status Of Preschool Children in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ali M Alsaqr; Ghayda'a Ibrahim; Ali Abu Sharha; Raied Fagehi
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

4.  Normative visual acuity in Chinese preschoolers aged 36 to <48 months as measured with the linear HOTV chart: the Yuhuatai Pediatric Eye Disease Study.

Authors:  Hui Zhu; Dan Huang; Qigang Sun; Hui Ding; Jing Bai; Ji Chen; Xuejuan Chen; Yue Wang; Xiaohan Zhang; Jing Wang; Xinying Li; Hu Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Vision Development Differences between Slow and Fast Motor Development in Typical Developing Toddlers: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Elena Pinero-Pinto; Verónica Pérez-Cabezas; Concepción De-Hita-Cantalejo; Carmen Ruiz-Molinero; Estanislao Gutiérrez-Sánchez; José-Jesús Jiménez-Rejano; José-María Sánchez-González; María Carmen Sánchez-González
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Prevalence of Visual Impairment in Preschool Children in Southern China.

Authors:  Hongxi Wang; Kunliang Qiu; Shengjie Yin; Yali Du; Binyao Chen; Jiao Jiang; Dandan Deng; Mingzhi Zhang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-04

7.  The Study of Short-Term Plastic Visual Perceptual Training Based on Virtual and Augmented Reality Technology in Amblyopia.

Authors:  Fan Tan; Xubo Yang; Yuchen Fan; Yongchuan Liao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.974

8.  Zagreb Amblyopia Preschool Screening Study: near and distance visual acuity testing increase the diagnostic accuracy of screening for amblyopia.

Authors:  Mladen Bušić; Mirjana Bjeloš; Mladen Petrovečki; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Senad Ramić; Daliborka Miletić; Lidija Andrijašević; Edita Kondža Krstonijević; Vid Jakovljević; Ana Bišćan Tvrdi; Jurica Predović; Antonio Kokot; Filip Bišćan; Mirna Kovačević Ljubić; Ranka Motušić Aras
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  Should tumbling E go out of date in amblyopia screening? Evidence from a population-based sample normative in children aged 3-4 years.

Authors:  Sandra Guimaraes; Tiago Fernandes; Patrício Costa; Eduardo Silva
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Visual acuity percentile curves in a Spanish paediatric population.

Authors:  Borja Navas-Navia; Laura Garcia-Montero; Belén Pérez-Sanchez; César Villa-Collar
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2021-02-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.