Literature DB >> 25711144

[Prognostic value of cardiovascular MRI in diabetics].

C L Schlett1, R C Bertheau, H-U Kauczor, S Weckbach.   

Abstract

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Despite an increased cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes mellitus they are a heterogeneous population with very different individual manifestation of diseases; therefore, a profound stratification is recommended. STANDARD
METHODS: Clinical examinations and blood biomarkers are typically used in diabetic patients to determine the risk for developing cardio-cerebrovascular events. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Cardiac as well as whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including cardiovascular sequences are established methods for clinical diagnostics. Their significance in predicting the outcome and the corresponding risk stratification for patients with diabetes is becoming increasingly more important based on recent study results. PERFORMANCE: Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in cardiac MRI detects silent myocardial ischemia in up to 30% of diabetic patients, which is associated with a hazard ratio of 3-6 for cardiovascular events. Regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities and decreased ejection fraction also have a prognostic value in diabetics. Based on whole-body MRI, the vessel score as well as carotid artery stenosis have been evaluated as additional predictors for cardio-cerebrovascular events. ACHIEVEMENTS: The MRI-based predictors have independent and incremental prognostic value beyond traditional risk stratification for cardio-cerebrovascular events; however, only the comprehensive assessment of whole-body MRI including angiography allows the identification of patients who remain free of cardio-cerebrovascular events over a period of 6 years. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Cardiac MRI, particularly the detection of LGE, can be recommended for risk stratification of patients with diabetes mellitus. The clinical relevance of the added prognostic value of whole-body MRI needs to be clarified in further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25711144     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-014-2719-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  48 in total

Review 1.  Management of coronary artery disease: therapeutic options in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  T Hammoud; J F Tanguay; M G Bourassa
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Diabetes mellitus: long-term prognostic value of whole-body MR imaging for the occurrence of cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

Authors:  Fabian Bamberg; Klaus G Parhofer; Elena Lochner; Roy P Marcus; Daniel Theisen; Hannes M Findeisen; Udo Hoffmann; Stefan O Schönberg; Christopher L Schlett; Maximilian F Reiser; Sabine Weckbach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging retinal oximetry: a quantitative physiological biomarker for early diabetic retinopathy?

Authors:  Y Yang; X R Zhu; Q G Xu; H Metcalfe; Z C Wang; J K Yang
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Prognostic value of unrecognised myocardial infarction detected by late gadolinium-enhanced MRI in diabetic patients with normal global and regional left ventricular systolic function.

Authors:  Yeonyee E Yoon; Kakuya Kitagawa; Shingo Kato; Hiroshi Nakajima; Tairo Kurita; Kaoru Dohi; Masaaki Ito; Hajime Sakuma
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Cerebral microvascular disease predicts renal failure in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Takashi Uzu; Yasuo Kida; Nobuo Shirahashi; Tamaki Harada; Atsushi Yamauchi; Makoto Nomura; Keiji Isshiki; Shin-Ichi Araki; Toshiro Sugimoto; Daisuke Koya; Masakazu Haneda; Atsunori Kashiwagi; Ryuichi Kikkawa
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.

Authors:  R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Assessing the impact of complications on the costs of Type II diabetes.

Authors:  R Williams; L Van Gaal; C Lucioni
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2002-06-12       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 8.  Whole-body contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: new advances at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Kambiz Nael; Michael C Fenchel; Ulrich Kramer; J Paul Finn; Stefan G Ruehm; Stefan Gruehm
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-04

9.  Prevalence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction determined by cardiac magnetic resonance in older adults.

Authors:  Erik B Schelbert; Jie J Cao; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Thor Aspelund; Peter Kellman; Anthony H Aletras; Christopher K Dyke; Gudmundur Thorgeirsson; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Lenore J Launer; Vilmundur Gudnason; Tamara B Harris; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment of cardiac volumes and regional function after myocardial infarction: an intrasubject comparison using simultaneous intrasubject recordings.

Authors:  Blake I Gardner; Scott E Bingham; Marvin R Allen; Duane D Blatter; Jeffrey L Anderson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.