Aaron J Dawes1, Greg D Sacks, H Gill Cryer, J Peter Gruen, Christy Preston, Deidre Gorospe, Marilyn Cohen, David L McArthur, Marcia M Russell, Melinda Maggard-Gibbons, Clifford Y Ko. 1. From the Departments of Surgery (A.J.D., G.D.S., H.G.C., M.C., M.M.R., M.M.-G., C.Y.K.), and Neurosurgery (D.M.), David Geffen School of Medicine, and Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program (A.J.D., G.D.S.), UCLA; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (A.J.D., M.M.R., M.M.-G., C.Y.K.); Department of Neurosurgery (J.P.G.), University of Southern California; and Emergency Medical Services Agency (C.P., D.G.), Department of Health Services, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is recommended by the Brain Trauma Foundation, the benefits remain controversial. We sought to determine the impact of ICP monitor placement on inpatient mortality within a regional trauma system after correcting for selection bias through propensity score matching. METHODS: Data were collected on all severe TBI cases presenting to 14 trauma centers during the 2-year study period (2009-2010). Inclusion criteria were as follows: blunt injury, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or lower in the emergency department, and abnormal intracranial findings on head computed tomography (CT). Two separate multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict ICP monitor placement and inpatient mortality after controlling for demographics, severity of injury, comorbidities, and TBI-specific variables (GCS score, pupil reactivity, international normalized ratio, and nine specific head CT findings). To account for selection bias, we developed a propensity score-matched model to estimate the "true" effect of ICP monitoring on in-hospital mortality. RESULT: A total of 844 patients met inclusion criteria; 22 died on arrival to the emergency department. Inpatient mortality was 38.8%; 46.0% of the patients underwent ICP monitor placement. Unadjusted mortality rates were significantly lower in the ICP monitoring group (30.7% vs. 45.7%, p < 0.001). ICP monitor placement was positively associated with CT findings of subdural hematoma, intraparenchymal contusion, and mass effect and negatively associated with age, alcoholism, and elevated international normalized ratio. After adjusting for selection bias via propensity score matching, ICP monitor placement was associated with an 8.3 percentage point reduction in the risk-adjusted mortality rate. CONCLUSION: ICP monitor placement occurred in only 46% of eligible patients but was associated with significantly decreased mortality after adjusting for baseline risk profile and the propensity to undergo monitoring. As the individual impact of ICP monitoring may vary, future efforts must determine who stands to benefit from invasive monitoring techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level III.
BACKGROUND: Although intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is recommended by the Brain Trauma Foundation, the benefits remain controversial. We sought to determine the impact of ICP monitor placement on inpatient mortality within a regional trauma system after correcting for selection bias through propensity score matching. METHODS: Data were collected on all severe TBI cases presenting to 14 trauma centers during the 2-year study period (2009-2010). Inclusion criteria were as follows: blunt injury, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or lower in the emergency department, and abnormal intracranial findings on head computed tomography (CT). Two separate multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict ICP monitor placement and inpatient mortality after controlling for demographics, severity of injury, comorbidities, and TBI-specific variables (GCS score, pupil reactivity, international normalized ratio, and nine specific head CT findings). To account for selection bias, we developed a propensity score-matched model to estimate the "true" effect of ICP monitoring on in-hospital mortality. RESULT: A total of 844 patients met inclusion criteria; 22 died on arrival to the emergency department. Inpatient mortality was 38.8%; 46.0% of the patients underwent ICP monitor placement. Unadjusted mortality rates were significantly lower in the ICP monitoring group (30.7% vs. 45.7%, p < 0.001). ICP monitor placement was positively associated with CT findings of subdural hematoma, intraparenchymal contusion, and mass effect and negatively associated with age, alcoholism, and elevated international normalized ratio. After adjusting for selection bias via propensity score matching, ICP monitor placement was associated with an 8.3 percentage point reduction in the risk-adjusted mortality rate. CONCLUSION: ICP monitor placement occurred in only 46% of eligible patients but was associated with significantly decreased mortality after adjusting for baseline risk profile and the propensity to undergo monitoring. As the individual impact of ICP monitoring may vary, future efforts must determine who stands to benefit from invasive monitoring techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level III.
Authors: Nithya Kannan; Alex Quistberg; Jin Wang; Jonathan I Groner; Richard B Mink; Mark S Wainwright; Michael J Bell; Christopher C Giza; Douglas F Zatzick; Richard G Ellenbogen; Linda Ng Boyle; Pamela H Mitchell; Monica S Vavilala Journal: Brain Inj Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 2.311