Literature DB >> 25710315

Decision making in trauma settings: simulation to improve diagnostic skills.

David J Murray1, Brad D Freeman, John R Boulet, Julie Woodhouse, James J Fehr, Mary E Klingensmith.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the setting of acute injury, a wrong, missed, or delayed diagnosis can impact survival. Clinicians rely on pattern recognition and heuristics to rapidly assess injuries, but an overreliance on these approaches can result in a diagnostic error. Simulation has been advocated as a method for practitioners to learn how to recognize the limitations of heuristics and develop better diagnostic skills. The objective of this study was to determine whether simulation could be used to provide teams the experiences in managing scenarios that require the use of heuristic as well as analytic diagnostic skills to effectively recognize and treat potentially life-threatening injuries.
METHODS: Ten scenarios were developed to assess the ability of trauma teams to provide initial care to a severely injured patient. Seven standard scenarios simulated severe injuries that once diagnosed could be effectively treated using standard Advanced Trauma Life Support algorithms. Because diagnostic error occurs more commonly in complex clinical settings, 3 complex scenarios required teams to use more advanced diagnostic skills to uncover a coexisting condition and treat the patient. Teams composed of 3 to 5 practitioners were evaluated in the performance of 7 (of 10) randomly selected scenarios (5 standard, 2 complex). Expert rates scored teams using standardized checklists and global scores.
RESULTS: Eighty-three surgery, emergency medicine, and anesthesia residents constituted 21 teams. Expert raters were able to reliably score the scenarios. Teams accomplished fewer checklist actions and received lower global scores on the 3 analytic scenarios (73.8% [12.3%] and 5.9 [1.6], respectively) compared with the 7 heuristic scenarios (83.2% [11.7%] and 6.6 [1.3], respectively; P < 0.05 for both). Teams led by more junior residents received higher global scores on the analytic scenarios (6.4 [1.3]) than the more senior team leaders (5.3 [1.7]).
CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study indicates that teams led by more senior residents received higher scores when managing heuristic scenarios but were less effective when managing the scenarios that require a more analytic approach. Simulation can be used to provide teams with decision-making experiences in trauma settings and could be used to improve diagnostic skills as well as study the decision-making process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25710315     DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Simul Healthc        ISSN: 1559-2332            Impact factor:   1.929


  10 in total

1.  The Simulation-Based Assessment of Pediatric Rapid Response Teams.

Authors:  James J Fehr; Mary E McBride; John R Boulet; David J Murray
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Medical Decision-Making in the Physician Hierarchy: A Pilot Pedagogical Evaluation.

Authors:  John Rosasco; Michele L McCarroll; M David Gothard; Jerry Myers; Patrick Hughes; Alan Schwartz; Richard L George; Rami A Ahmed
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2020-07-02

3.  Medical judgement analogue studies with applications to spaceflight crew medical officer.

Authors:  Michele L McCarroll; Rami A Ahmed; Alan Schwartz; Michael David Gothard; Steven Scott Atkinson; Patrick Hughes; Jose Cepeda Brito; Lori Assad; Jerry Myers; Richard L George
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2017-06-29

4.  Optimistic bias: the more you do, the better you think it goes. Survey analysis of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carlos Torrens; Joan Miquel; Fernando Santana
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2019-08-27

Review 5.  Simulation in Neurocritical Care: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Nicholas A Morris; Barry M Czeisler; Aarti Sarwal
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Do We Know Why We Make Errors in Morphological Diagnosis? An Analysis of Approach and Decision-Making in Haematological Morphology.

Authors:  Michelle Brereton; Barbara De La Salle; John Ardern; Keith Hyde; John Burthem
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 8.143

7.  Trauma facilities in Denmark - a nationwide cross-sectional benchmark study of facilities and trauma care organisation.

Authors:  Jesper Weile; Klaus Nielsen; Stine C Primdahl; Christian A Frederiksen; Christian B Laursen; Erik Sloth; Ole Mølgaard; Lars Knudsen; Hans Kirkegaard
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Development, Validation, and Implementation of a Medical Judgment Metric.

Authors:  Rami A Ahmed; Michele L McCarroll; Alan Schwartz; M David Gothard; S Scott Atkinson; Patrick G Hughes; Jose Ramon Cepeda Brito; Lori Assad; Jerry G Myers; Richard L George
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2017-06-19

9.  Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon.

Authors:  Linda Sonesson; Kenneth Boffard; Lars Lundberg; Martin Rydmark; Klas Karlgren
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Design and Development of an Interactive Web-Based Simulator for Trauma Training: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Blanca Larraga-García; Luis Castañeda López; Francisco Javier Rubio Bolívar; Manuel Quintana-Díaz; Álvaro Gutiérrez
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 4.460

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.