Literature DB >> 25710139

Microbiological effects of a routine treatment for decontaminating hide-on carcasses at a large beef packing plant.

Xianqin Yang1, Madhu Badoni2, Frances Tran2, Colin O Gill2.   

Abstract

To investigate the microbiological effects of a hide-on carcass decontaminating treatment recently implemented at a beef packing plant, carcasses undergoing routine processing at the plant were sampled during successive periods in January/February, April/May, and September/October. During each period, samples were collected from carcasses before and after the decontamination of hide-on carcasses, after skinning, before decontamination of the skinned carcasses, and at the end of the carcass dressing process. At each stage of processing during each period, samples were obtained by swabbing an area of 1,000 cm(2) on each of 25 carcasses. Aerobes, coliforms, and Escherichia coli were enumerated. In most samples, coliforms were predominantly E. coli. In all three periods, the log mean numbers of aerobes and E. coli recovered from hides before decontamination were between 6.6 and 6.8 and between 5.3 and 5.9 log CFU/1,000 cm(2), respectively. The log mean numbers of aerobes recovered from decontaminated hides were 6.6 log CFU/1,000 cm(2) in January/February and April/May but 5.4 log CFU/1,000 cm(2) in September/October. The log total numbers of E. coli recovered from decontaminated hides in January/February and April/May were 2.4 and 3.8 log CFU/25,000 cm(2), respectively, but no E. coli was recovered from such carcasses in September/October. Log total numbers of aerobes and E. coli recovered from skinned or dressed carcasses were mostly >4 and between 1 and 2 log CFU/25,000 cm(2), respectively. Typing of 480 E. coli isolates by multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) identified 218 MLVA types. Most isolates recovered from carcasses in different periods or at different stages of processing were of different MLVA types. However, small numbers of MLVA types were recovered in more than one period or from both hides before and after decontamination and skinned or dressed carcasses. The findings show that the hide-decontaminating treatment disrupted the usual transfer of E. coli from hides to meat surfaces during carcass skinning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25710139     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  4 in total

1.  Biofilm-Forming Capacity of Escherichia coli Isolated from Cattle and Beef Packing Plants: Relation to Virulence Attributes, Stage of Processing, Antimicrobial Interventions, and Heat Tolerance.

Authors:  Kim Stanford; Frances Tran; Peipei Zhang; Xianqin Yang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Genomic and Phenotypic Analysis of Heat and Sanitizer Resistance in Escherichia coli from Beef in Relation to the Locus of Heat Resistance.

Authors:  Xianqin Yang; Frances Tran; Peipei Zhang; Hui Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Are Antimicrobial Interventions Associated with Heat-Resistant Escherichia coli on Meat?

Authors:  Peipei Zhang; Frances Tran; Kim Stanford; Xianqin Yang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Evidence for the benefits of food chain interventions on E. coli O157:H7/NM prevalence in retail ground beef and human disease incidence: A success story.

Authors:  Frank Pollari; Tanya Christidis; Katarina D M Pintar; Andrea Nesbitt; Jeff Farber; Marie-Claude Lavoie; Alex Gill; Penelope Kirsch; Roger P Johnson
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2017-01-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.